Donald Trump’s return to power on January 20th necessitates continued rigorous reporting. HuffPost remains committed to providing unbiased coverage of the new administration. This crucial information will remain freely accessible to all, thanks to reader support. Contributions, even the simple act of creating a free account, are vital to maintaining this commitment to accessible journalism.
Donald Trump’s return to power on January 20th necessitates continued robust and fearless reporting. HuffPost is committed to providing this critical news coverage freely, ensuring accessibility for all. Reader support is crucial to maintaining this commitment to unbiased journalism without paywalls. Even creating a free account contributes significantly to this effort.
Readers are encouraged to submit tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of use. Contributions may lead to impactful investigative journalism. All tips are treated with confidentiality. Contact information is readily available on the website.
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s 137-page report on the January 6th insurrection details substantial evidence against Donald Trump and his associates, sufficient for a conviction were he not a former and potentially future president. The report undermines the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling by highlighting that much of Trump’s conduct was outside his constitutional powers. Furthermore, the report implicitly criticizes the Department of Justice’s policy against indicting a sitting president, suggesting this policy hindered the investigation. The report’s evidence heavily implicates both high-profile and less prominent participants in a coordinated attempt to subvert the 2020 election results.
This section of the article encourages reader contributions. The publication solicits news tips from its audience. Readers are invited to submit information through a provided link. This demonstrates a commitment to participatory journalism and crowdsourced news gathering. The “NO, THANKS” headline is likely ironic, implying a desire for reader engagement despite the seemingly dismissive phrase.
No article text was provided to summarize. Please provide the article text so a summary can be generated.
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concludes that Donald Trump’s actions to overturn the 2020 election constituted criminal efforts to retain power, including attempts to induce state officials to falsify vote counts and pressure the Vice President. Had Trump not won the 2024 election, the report asserts sufficient evidence existed for a conviction. Trump vehemently denies the findings, attacking Smith’s integrity and alleging the House Select Committee illegally destroyed evidence. Smith, having resigned, defended his investigation’s impartiality and adherence to the law.
Jack Smith’s final report on the January 6th case unequivocally states that his case against Donald Trump was robust enough to secure a conviction. This declaration, while seemingly straightforward, carries significant weight given the intense scrutiny and political polarization surrounding the investigation. It highlights the strength of the evidence gathered and the legal arguments developed by Smith’s team, suggesting a high probability of success had the trial proceeded as planned.
The report’s conclusion directly addresses the central question of whether the prosecution’s case was viable. By stating that it could have “sustained a conviction,” Smith effectively counters any claims that the investigation was weak or lacked sufficient evidence to bring a successful prosecution.… Continue reading
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concludes that sufficient evidence existed to convict President-elect Donald Trump for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results, had he not been re-elected in 2024. The Department of Justice report details Trump’s alleged efforts, including spreading false claims of election fraud and inciting violence. Smith’s investigation faced significant challenges, including Trump’s use of social media to influence witnesses and legal proceedings. However, the DOJ’s policy prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president precluded further action.
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report details Donald Trump’s alleged attempts to interfere with the 2020 election, outlining charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruct official proceedings. These charges stemmed from efforts to overturn the election results. However, the Department of Justice declined to prosecute Trump due to its longstanding policy against indicting a sitting president. The report itself is now publicly available.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood