Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s surprise resignation, just weeks before Donald Trump’s inauguration and threatened imposition of steep tariffs on Canadian imports, leaves Canada in a vulnerable position. This timing is considered highly problematic given the upcoming negotiations with the U.S. and the resulting lame-duck government. Experts express concern over Canada’s diminished capacity to respond effectively to Trump’s potential actions, particularly with key cabinet ministers potentially preoccupied with the Liberal leadership race. Trudeau assures that the government will continue to prioritize Canadian interests, despite the ongoing leadership transition.
Read More
Following the announcement of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Donald Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, several Democrats criticized Attorney General Merrick Garland for a perceived delay in launching the probe. These critics, including Representatives Nadler and Lofgren and Senators Schiff and Smith, argued that the January 6th Committee’s findings should have prompted immediate action, potentially altering the outcome of the 2024 election. Conversely, some Democrats attributed the perceived inaction to Trump’s success in manipulating the narrative surrounding the January 6th attack. Regardless, Special Counsel Smith’s impending report and recommendations will soon be submitted to the Department of Justice.
Read More
Trump’s first lie in office was undoubtedly his oath of office. This isn’t merely a provocative statement; it’s a conclusion reached by considering the totality of his character and actions. The very act of swearing to uphold the Constitution, while simultaneously harboring intentions to disregard it, constitutes a profound betrayal of the public trust.
It’s difficult to pinpoint his first lie *ever*, lost somewhere in the mists of his childhood. But focusing solely on his presidency allows a clearer perspective. The oath, a solemn promise before the nation, becomes a blatant falsehood when juxtaposed with his subsequent actions. From the consistent disregard for democratic norms to the blatant attempts to subvert the electoral process, his presidency has been characterized by a pattern of deceit.… Continue reading
President Biden has voiced his strong disapproval of President-elect Trump’s intention to eliminate birthright citizenship in the United States. He described the idea as “awful,” highlighting the profound implications of such a move.
The cornerstone of this sentiment rests on the fundamental belief that the U.S. is a unique multicultural nation, and this diversity is a significant source of its strength. Altering birthright citizenship would fundamentally undermine this very essence.
Biden questioned the very logic of such a proposition. He pointed out the inherent contradiction in denying citizenship to individuals born within the country’s borders, questioning what principles would then define citizenship.… Continue reading
Protests in Washington D.C. are urging Congress to prevent President-elect Trump’s inauguration, citing the 14th Amendment’s disqualification clause for those who engaged in insurrection. While some legal experts argue this action is constitutionally permissible, based on Trump’s actions surrounding the January 6th Capitol riot, the movement, “14th Now,” is unlikely to sway Congress, which intends to certify the election results. Despite legal challenges in state courts, the Supreme Court prevented states from barring presidential candidates, leaving the question of Trump’s eligibility unresolved. Trump’s transition team maintains he will serve all Americans.
Read More
Vice President Kamala Harris will certify Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory on January 6th, a duty mandated by federal law. This action contrasts sharply with her campaign rhetoric, where she vehemently denounced Trump as a threat to democracy and warned against his presidency. The certification occurs four years after the January 6th Capitol riot, fueled by Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Increased security measures are in place for the event, reflecting the heightened tensions surrounding the process.
Read More
The resurgence of Donald Trump and his administration necessitates a renewed emphasis on the societal importance of shame. Trump’s success stems from normalizing public displays of ignorance and unfounded claims by himself and his allies, exemplified by instances like his mischaracterizations of the New Orleans attack and Kennedy’s nomination to a critical health position. Tolerating such behavior, rather than publicly shaming it, has emboldened the spread of misinformation and harmful policies. Therefore, actively confronting and mocking demonstrably stupid statements from public figures is crucial to counteracting the influence of Trumpism.
Read More
The 2025 inauguration of Donald Trump, the instigator of the January 6th Capitol riot, marks a stark contrast to the heightened security measures of Biden’s 2021 inauguration. Many Republicans initially condemned the violence but later downplayed or denied its severity, even excusing those who assaulted police. Trump plans to pardon those charged with crimes related to the event, further highlighting the partisan divisions surrounding the attack. This anniversary underscores the ongoing political gaslighting and the fragility of American democracy.
Read More
All five living U.S. presidents, including Donald Trump, will attend Jimmy Carter’s funeral, offering a rare moment of potential political unity. President Biden will deliver the eulogy, a role Carter himself requested. While Trump’s behavior will be closely watched, his attendance signifies a potential adherence to presidential norms. The service, incorporating bipartisan elements, provides a temporary reprieve from the current political rancor, showcasing a capacity for unity through ritual respect.
Read More
Post-election polling reveals that voters in key swing states prioritized economic concerns over concerns about Donald Trump’s actions surrounding the January 6th Capitol attack, despite his impeachment and indictment. This suggests a disconnect between Democratic messaging on Trump’s threat to democracy and voter perceptions, with many not viewing him as a significant danger. The survey highlights a failure to effectively link Trump’s authoritarian behavior to tangible consequences for voters, as well as an underestimation of his ongoing appeal among certain demographics. Ultimately, the perceived threat to democracy paled in comparison to economic anxieties in influencing voter decisions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood