The initial response to Donald Trump’s rise was strategically flawed, mischaracterizing him as an aberration rather than a transformative phenomenon. This led to Democrats prioritizing “normal” governance, neglecting crucial preemptive measures like electoral reform or challenging Trump’s actions more aggressively. A shift is needed from adhering to traditional norms to utilizing all available legal tools to counter Trump’s authoritarian tendencies, even if it means employing unconventional tactics. This includes proactive legal challenges to anticipated Trump policies, filling key positions, and utilizing executive powers before the transition of power. Ultimately, a more forceful, proactive approach is necessary to effectively impede Trump’s agenda.
Read More
Several letters address Donald Trump’s election victory, attributing it not to Democratic failures or economic hardship, but to voters’ disregard for his character flaws. Contributors highlight a lack of civic education as a contributing factor to this apathy, arguing that many voters prioritized self-interest over the common good, despite potentially harming their own economic well-being. Other letters discuss diverse topics including the accountability of universities, the environmental impact of animal agriculture, vaping regulations, and the financial dealings of the British Royal Family. Finally, several letters offer anecdotal counterpoints to recent news stories.
Read More
Senator Bernie Sanders expressed support for President-elect Trump’s campaign proposal to cap credit card interest rates at 10%, a measure Sanders views as crucial to protecting working-class Americans from exorbitant fees currently averaging 21.5%. This contrasts with the Biden administration’s unsuccessful attempt to lower late fees. Sanders sees this as an opportunity for bipartisan cooperation, advocating for an end to what he terms “usury” by major banks.
Read More
Donald Trump’s nomination of Peter Hegseth for Secretary of Defense has sparked controversy. Prominent civil rights attorney Sherrilyn Ifill labeled Hegseth a white supremacist and extremist, citing his writings opposing Black military advancement and his views on women and LGBTQ+ individuals in the military. Critics also point to Hegseth’s lack of relevant experience, despite his military service, raising concerns about the nomination’s potential impact on national security. Hegseth’s confirmation requires a Senate majority vote, making his controversial past a significant hurdle to his appointment.
Read More
Donald Trump is attempting to install controversial figures like Matt Gaetz and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. into his administration, bypassing Senate confirmation through threats and potential unconstitutional actions. Should the Senate refuse to confirm his nominees, Trump intends to leverage the power of recess appointments, or even adjourn Congress himself—a drastic measure with potentially catastrophic consequences for the constitutional balance of power. This action is perceived by many as a blatant disregard for established democratic processes and a power grab. However, some believe that Republican senators will ultimately uphold their constitutional responsibilities and prevent Trump from succeeding.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith is concluding his investigations into Donald Trump, facing a tight deadline before Trump’s potential inauguration. Two cases are involved: one concerning Trump’s actions related to the January 6th insurrection and another regarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Smith must submit a final report to Attorney General Garland, who will then decide on public release, though Trump’s potential retribution looms large. The reports’ contents, including classified information and grand jury materials, will be closely watched, especially considering Trump’s threats and the uncertain future of the investigations.
Read More
Despite initial bipartisan support, the bill aimed at curbing anti-Israel protests faces a renewed House vote following a Rules Committee hearing. This legislation, concerningly, poses a significant threat to First Amendment rights, granting potentially abusive powers. The bill’s passage would be especially alarming given recent events, raising concerns about potential misuse by the incoming administration. The ACLU rightly celebrated its initial defeat, highlighting the bill’s inherent dangers. With a narrow GOP majority, securing passage now necessitates further Democratic support.
Read More
Rahm Emanuel’s potential DNC chairmanship faces significant headwinds. His past clashes with successful party leaders, like Howard Dean, highlight a differing strategic vision at odds with current Democratic needs. Furthermore, his abrasive personality and lack of recent grassroots experience make him an unlikely candidate to unify the party and build a winning national strategy. Ultimately, his candidacy seems ill-suited to the current political landscape demanding a different approach to electoral success. The Chicago Teachers Union’s outright rejection underscores this assessment.
Read More
Donald Trump’s stated plans for a second term include illegally deploying the military against domestic protesters and for mass deportations, mirroring his prior attempts to do so. His threats, fueled by a recent Supreme Court decision granting presidents near-absolute immunity, raise serious concerns about the erosion of checks and balances. The Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits such actions, but Trump’s potential invocation of the Insurrection Act, particularly its vaguely worded sections, presents a significant loophole. Despite proposed reforms to the Insurrection Act, the current political climate makes such changes unlikely, leaving the military and the nation vulnerable to unconstitutional orders.
Read More
Hamas’s plea for Donald Trump’s intervention to pressure Israel into ending the Gaza war seems wildly optimistic, given Trump’s past actions and statements. The idea that Trump, who moved the US embassy to Jerusalem and holds generally pro-Israel views, would somehow act as a mediator for a more favorable outcome for Hamas is frankly, a long shot.
The central issue revolves around Hamas’s refusal to meet basic preconditions for negotiations. The consistent demand for the release of hostages is paramount. Until this crucial step is taken, any hope of de-escalation is hampered. The narrative of innocent civilians caught in the crossfire is understandably tragic, but the actions of Hamas, including initiating the conflict and hiding behind civilian populations, significantly undermine their credibility.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood