Stay informed on the 2024 US Presidential election with the FT’s comprehensive coverage, including news, analysis, and data. Access exclusive insights and policy plans through the White House Watch newsletter. Gain deeper perspectives on the election’s impact on democracy through the Democracy 2024 section. These resources offer a complete understanding of the election and its implications.
Haley’s recent expressions of concern regarding Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are drawing significant criticism, largely due to her past actions and endorsements. The timing of her concerns, surfacing after her failure to secure a position in the current administration, fuels suspicion that her pronouncements are motivated by self-interest rather than genuine principle.
The argument that Haley’s concerns are disingenuous stems from her previous enthusiastic support for Donald Trump. Her endorsement of Trump, despite her earlier criticisms of his qualifications for the presidency, is seen as a betrayal of her purported values and a significant erosion of her credibility. This past allegiance to Trump, now viewed by many as a catastrophic mistake, renders her current anxieties about other political figures suspect in the eyes of many.… Continue reading
Following President Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard to lead U.S. intelligence, Democrats raised concerns about her past interactions with Russian and Syrian officials, citing potential conflicts of interest. Republicans strongly defended Gabbard, dismissing Democratic accusations of her being a “compromised” asset as politically motivated attacks stemming from her party switch and alliance with Trump. While some Republicans acknowledged needing further clarification on Gabbard’s past actions, they largely rejected the claims of her being a threat to national security. The controversy highlights partisan divisions over Gabbard’s suitability for the critical intelligence role.
Jimmy Kimmel, appearing on MSNBC’s *Morning Joe*, argued that disliking Donald Trump is rational, even suggesting that “Trump Derangement Syndrome” should apply to reasonable people. He highlighted Trump’s Manhattan conviction and the upcoming sentencing, emphasizing that the former president is essentially running for president to avoid prison. Kimmel’s comments are part of a broader trend of liberal celebrities increasing their anti-Trump rhetoric in the lead-up to the election, a trend seemingly correlated with Trump’s improved poll numbers following indictments. This surge in celebrity opposition coincides with Trump’s fundraising increases post-conviction.
Donald Trump’s proposed immigration policies, including mass deportations and the potential violation of birthright citizenship, represent a grave threat to the American legal and economic system. These plans, if enacted, would severely impact California’s economy, particularly agriculture and construction, and cause widespread social disruption. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has stated that the state is prepared to take legal action against any unlawful actions taken by the federal government. This preparedness includes preemptive legal strategies and collaboration with other states and advocacy groups to protect residents and challenge federal overreach.
Jon Stewart argues that the media misinterprets Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks, overlooking their intended purpose: dismantling government agencies. Trump’s nominees, like Linda McMahon at the Department of Education, are not chosen for their administrative skills but rather for their willingness to dismantle their respective departments. This strategy aligns with Trump’s stated goals and reflects a broader desire, echoed by some Democratic voters, for government reform and increased responsiveness. Stewart ultimately blames the Democrats’ failure to reform bureaucratic inefficiencies for creating this environment.
Donald Trump’s nomination of Russ Vought, a key architect of the conservative Project 2025, to lead the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has sparked controversy. Vought’s involvement in Project 2025, which advocates for expanding presidential power and reducing the influence of career civil servants, raises concerns about the potential implementation of its proposals. These proposals include significant changes to the federal workforce and increased presidential control over various government agencies. The nomination has drawn both praise from Republicans and criticism from Democrats who view it as a threat to governmental norms. Several other Project 2025 contributors have also received cabinet nominations under Trump.
Donald Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was previously on the TSA’s “Quiet Skies” list, prompting additional security screenings due to foreign connections and travel. This is highly unusual for someone assuming such a position. While Gabbard attributes her inclusion to political retaliation, the list’s algorithm-based nature and her controversial meetings with Bashar al-Assad, along with past accusations of spreading Russian propaganda, raise concerns. Trump’s suggestion that some nominees may bypass standard background checks further complicates the situation, leaving questions about the extent of Gabbard’s required disclosures.
Following the recent election, President-elect Trump has appointed Elon Musk to lead a newly created “Department of Government Efficiency,” a move widely seen as a quid pro quo for Musk’s campaign support. This contrasts sharply with Vice President-elect Vance’s sidelined role, evidenced by his exclusion from Trump’s inner circle and his unsuccessful attempts to secure Senate confirmations for Trump’s cabinet nominees. Furthermore, Vance’s actions suggest Trump intends to replace the FBI Director, Christopher Wray, before his term expires, another indication of Trump’s disregard for established norms. The Senate Republicans’ response to these actions will determine the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches in the coming years.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
Clinton Slams Trump’s Loyalty-First Cabinet: Hurt People, No Consequences
In a recent MSNBC interview, former President Bill Clinton offered commentary on Donald Trump’s return to the White House and his cabinet appointments. Clinton quipped that politics uniquely allows inauthenticity to thrive. The conversation covered a broad range of topics, highlighting Clinton’s perspective on the current political landscape. Notably, Clinton’s remarks on Trump’s administration underscore concerns about experience and competence.
Read More