Trump’s actions are driven by self-interest, prioritizing tax cuts, deregulation, and personal gratification over coherent policy goals. His tendency to surround himself with controversial figures, from those accused of sexual misconduct to proto-fascists, stems from an attraction to transgression and sycophancy rather than shared ideology. This lack of ideological grounding, combined with his incompetence, creates an environment where unscrupulous individuals thrive. Consequently, Trump’s potential return to power poses a significant threat due to the predictable empowerment of harmful actors within his administration.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith dismissed the January 6th and classified documents cases against Donald Trump due to Justice Department policy barring the prosecution of a sitting president, though the dismissals were without prejudice. While the Georgia election interference case remains, its viability is uncertain due to ongoing appeals. Consequently, Trump avoids legal consequences for several indictments, including a conviction, setting a concerning precedent for future presidents. This impunity, combined with potential political retribution against prosecutors, suggests a future presidency operating largely beyond legal accountability.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecutions of Donald Trump for election interference and classified document mishandling were ultimately unsuccessful, resulting in a significant victory for the president-elect. The federal cases were shelved due to Justice Department policy prohibiting the indictment or prosecution of sitting presidents, a decision that effectively exonerated Trump despite the gravity of the accusations. This outcome reinforces Trump’s belief in unchecked authority and carries profound implications for his upcoming term and future presidencies. The failure to hold Trump accountable represents a setback for the rule of law, potentially emboldening future presidents to engage in similar actions.
Read More
Federal prosecutors dismissed the two criminal cases against Donald Trump, citing Justice Department policy prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president. This decision, spurred by Trump’s election victory, effectively ends the years-long legal battles initiated by Special Counsel Jack Smith. While the cases against Trump’s co-defendants may continue, the dismissal highlights Trump’s successful strategy of leveraging his presidential campaign to avoid prosecution. The decision was met with celebratory statements from Trump’s team, who cited the “political weaponization” of the justice system.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith dismissed all federal criminal charges against President-elect Trump, citing constitutional requirements for dismissal before inauguration. The dismissals were “without prejudice,” meaning the cases could be reinstated after Trump leaves office in 2029. While Smith dropped the appeal in Trump’s classified documents case, appeals remain for co-defendants. This action leaves open the possibility of future prosecution, although the likelihood of renewed cases remains uncertain.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith dropped all charges against Donald Trump for election subversion and classified document retention, citing Department of Justice policy preventing the indictment of a sitting president. This decision, deemed a “miscarriage of justice” by some, leaves Trump facing only Georgia election charges and potential future re-filing. Critics argue this establishes Trump’s position above the law, while supporters celebrate a victory for the rule of law. The outcome is widely interpreted as a significant development in the ongoing political and legal battles surrounding Trump.
Read More
Republican Senator Matt Gaetz withdrew his name from consideration for Attorney General after facing anticipated opposition from several Republican Senators. This opposition stemmed from Gaetz’s role in ousting former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and an ongoing ethics investigation. The withdrawal sparked outrage among prominent Trump supporters, who accused these senators of obstructing the President-elect’s agenda. At least four Republican Senators reportedly indicated they would vote against Gaetz’s confirmation. Gaetz cited concerns that his confirmation process was becoming a distraction.
Read More
Donald Trump’s recent appointments, including Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense, and Matt Gaetz for Attorney General, represent a significant shift towards controversial figures. Gabbard, a former congresswoman with a history of promoting conspiracy theories and aligning with Russian propaganda, is particularly concerning given her new role overseeing intelligence agencies. Her past actions, including downplaying Assad’s chemical weapons attacks and spreading misinformation about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, raise serious questions about her suitability for the position. This unconventional approach to staffing key national security positions reflects a clear preference by Trump for candidates who challenge established norms.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump concerning classified document mishandling and election interference. These dismissals stem from the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy prohibiting the indictment of a sitting president, a policy invoked previously during Trump’s first term and now applicable due to his re-election. While the government maintained the merits of its cases, the policy’s application necessitated the dismissal. This decision, following Supreme Court rulings bolstering presidential immunity, marks a significant moment, leaving the pursuit of accountability for these alleged actions to Congress via impeachment.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith dropped all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump regarding mishandling classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This decision, citing the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy against indicting a sitting president, comes despite the gravity of the alleged crimes. Conservative judicial rulings, including a Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, significantly impacted the case’s dismissal. The DOJ’s policy, established during Watergate, prioritizes a president’s ability to perform their duties unimpeded by legal proceedings, ultimately preventing further prosecution. Smith’s team plans to resign before Trump’s inauguration.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker