Facing increasing threats, the free press is crucial to America’s future. HuffPost remains committed to unbiased reporting despite pressure on other news organizations. Continued operation depends on reader support, which can be provided through financial contributions or by simply creating a free account. The call to action emphasizes the importance of safeguarding independent journalism.
In a Thanksgiving message posted to Truth Social, Donald Trump extended greetings but also attacked “Radical Left Lunatics,” claiming their efforts to harm the country have failed due to a landslide victory for MAGA. He predicted a future of national strength and pride, echoing similar sentiments from previous years. This initial fiery message was later followed by a more subdued post featuring a photograph of himself with a police officer. Trump’s combative Thanksgiving messages have become a recurring tradition on his social media platforms.
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s delayed appointment of a special counsel in the January 6th case remains questionable, potentially impacting the timing and outcome of investigations. Trump’s legal victories, including favorable judicial assignments and Supreme Court rulings, highlight his remarkable luck and the strategic timing of key legal decisions. These rulings significantly bolster Trump’s legal position, potentially leading to dismissals of criminal charges and favorable civil case outcomes. The Supreme Court’s decision on presidential immunity further empowers Trump, suggesting a significant impact on future presidential actions.
In “The War on Warriors,” Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, frames the American left as an internal enemy, arguing that “woke” ideology is weakening the military. He contends that initiatives like diversity, equity, and inclusion programs are detrimental to military readiness and advocates for a more aggressive approach to warfare, dismissing rules of engagement as overly restrictive and hindering victory. Hegseth calls for a rewriting of the laws of war, prioritizing decisive wins over adherence to international norms. The book also portrays the military as a positive force for young men, contrasting it with what he describes as a left-wing attack on American values and the Constitution.
Donald Trump’s incoming administration is actively debating the extent of military intervention in Mexico to combat drug cartels, a policy gaining traction within the Republican party. Proposed actions range from covert special forces operations to airstrikes and cyber warfare, with the ultimate goal of disrupting cartel activities. Key figures within Trump’s circle, including his selections for Secretary of Defense and National Security Advisor, publicly support this approach. The plan hinges on a potential ultimatum to the Mexican government; failure to curb fentanyl trafficking could trigger US military action.
Donald Trump’s recent outburst against The New York Times, sparked by an article about a loyal aide, showcased his demand for media subservience based on his perceived election victory. This incident, analyzed with former Times public editor Margaret Sullivan, foreshadows potential future crackdowns on press freedom. Sullivan’s insights illuminate the potential strategies Trump may employ to control the narrative. The episode explores Trump’s tactics and the likely media response to his efforts to stifle dissent.
Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, Donald Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, was briefly placed on a TSA watchlist due to an algorithm flagging her travel history and foreign connections. Although quickly removed after Gabbard publicized the matter, the incident raises questions about vetting processes for such sensitive positions, particularly given the unusual nature of a nominee being flagged for additional screening. While sources dispute her claims of political targeting, the episode highlights concerns about the interplay between foreign engagement, political rhetoric, and national security protocols. Gabbard’s past comments, including those related to Russia and Syria, further complicate her nomination.
Following the dismissal of the federal case against Donald Trump regarding his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, Attorney General Merrick Garland faced sharp criticism from left-leaning figures. The case was dropped due to the Department of Justice’s policy against prosecuting sitting presidents, a decision that special counsel Jack Smith supported. Critics argued that Garland’s perceived delays, including the timing of Smith’s appointment, contributed to Trump’s 2024 electoral victory and allowed him to avoid accountability. While the dismissal was without prejudice, allowing for future prosecution, the move sparked intense debate regarding Garland’s handling of the investigation and its broader implications.
Despite Donald Trump’s claim of an “unprecedented mandate,” his victory was narrow, with a popular vote margin smaller than Hillary Clinton’s 2016 margin and falling short of a majority. His Electoral College win, while significant, was also less substantial than previous victories by Obama and Bush. Furthermore, Republican control of Congress is tenuous, potentially hindering his agenda. Therefore, the assertion of a powerful mandate is unsubstantiated by the election results.
Trump’s Truth Social post attacked Maggie Haberman and the New York Times, claiming their coverage of him is consistently inaccurate and biased. He specifically cited a recent article detailing Natalie Harp’s influential role in relaying information to Trump, portraying Harp as an “enabler” of his impulsive behavior. Trump demanded an apology for what he deems years of false reporting, emphasizing his election victory despite this alleged negative coverage. The article detailed Harp’s significant role in mediating information flow to Trump, a concerning development to his staff.
John Q. Hosedrinker