President Trump’s golfing expenses have surpassed $26 million since the start of his second term, exceeding $20 million more quickly than during his first term. This cost includes Air Force One travel, military transportation of his motorcade, and extensive security measures like marine patrols and bomb-sniffing dogs. The expenses are based on a 2019 Government Accountability Office report, which calculated the cost per trip in 2017 dollars; the actual cost is likely significantly higher. This substantial expenditure contrasts sharply with the president’s repeated claims of reducing government waste.
Read More
Following a Meet the Press interview discussing a Signal group chat controversy involving National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, President Trump criticized NBC and the show on Truth Social. Trump accused the network of prioritizing a “witch hunt” over substantive issues like peace talks and military successes, further alleging that NBC employs dishonest journalists at the behest of a weak chairman. Goldberg, during the interview, refuted Waltz’s denials of their acquaintance and highlighted the risks associated with sharing sensitive military information via an unsecure app. Trump dismissed the entire matter as a politically motivated attack aimed at undermining his administration’s achievements.
Read More
Steve Bannon recently predicted that Democrats will aggressively pursue impeaching Donald Trump in 2027, potentially leading to imprisonment. This follows Bannon’s previous assertion that Trump will win a third term in 2028, a claim met with skepticism due to term limits. Bannon, however, remains confident, suggesting unspecified alternative strategies are underway. He insists these methods are democratic, focusing on voter engagement, despite constitutional constraints.
Read More
Donald Trump’s repeated mention of Joe Biden – a staggering 316 times in just 50 days – highlights a pattern of blame-shifting that’s become a defining characteristic of his public persona. It’s not just the sheer number of mentions that’s striking, but the consistent use of Biden as a scapegoat for virtually any issue, positive or negative, that arises.
This consistent blaming of Biden suggests a deeper psychological dynamic at play. It seems less about legitimate political discourse and more about a desperate attempt to deflect responsibility. It’s a pattern that many have noted, and one that’s become almost comical in its predictability.… Continue reading
Despite the 22nd Amendment’s prohibition against a third presidential term, Donald Trump stated he’s “not joking” about the possibility, citing public interest in such a bid. While emphasizing his current focus, he acknowledged potential methods to circumvent the constitutional limit, including a scenario involving a Vice President’s ascension. These possibilities, echoed by Steve Bannon, remain legally unviable, requiring a constitutional amendment. Trump’s comments, however, highlight his continued flirtation with the idea.
Read More
President Trump’s positive response to a potential Commonwealth invitation sparked significant backlash from his supporters. Many vehemently opposed the idea, citing concerns about relinquishing American independence and associating with perceived globalist figures like King Charles. The strong negative reaction highlights a deep-seated anti-British sentiment within a segment of Trump’s base, despite clarifications that associate membership wouldn’t make Charles head of state. Alex Jones further fueled the controversy, warning of a potential repeat of the American Revolution.
Read More
Former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci predicts Vice President JD Vance’s political future will mirror that of Mike Pence, ultimately falling out of favor with President Trump. Scaramucci attributes this prediction to Trump’s dislike of Vance’s perceived imitation, including mirroring Trump’s statements and attire. He believes Trump is not impressed by sycophancy and that Vance’s attempts at mirroring him are ultimately detrimental. The president’s avoidance of questions about Vance as a potential successor further supports this assessment. Scaramucci concludes that Vance hasn’t yet proven himself a worthy member of Trump’s inner circle.
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revoked security clearances for numerous individuals, including former Biden administration officials and those involved in investigations of President Trump. This action targeted individuals perceived as having “weaponized” the legal system against Trump, such as lawyers involved in cases against him and those who labeled Hunter Biden laptop information as “disinformation”. The revocations, part of a broader campaign initiated after Trump’s inauguration, also affected former President Biden, who will no longer receive the President’s Daily Brief. Several targeted individuals, including attorney Mark Zaid, have questioned the due process involved in these revocations.
Read More
In waging a war against TdA, the Trump administration’s actions, particularly the use of CECOT, potentially violated several key legal frameworks. These include the Geneva Conventions, which were breached through the alleged exploitation of prisoners and denial of their communication rights. Furthermore, the administration may have contravened the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 by sending prisoners to a location known for human rights abuses. Judge Boasberg’s Monday filing highlights these potential violations. The administration’s actions, therefore, warrant further scrutiny under both domestic and international law.
Read More
Elon Musk’s prediction that Donald Trump will target those spreading misinformation about Tesla is a fascinating development. It paints a picture of a potentially tumultuous clash between two powerful figures, each with significant influence and a history of unconventional actions. The notion of Trump acting as a sort of enforcer against Tesla’s critics highlights the inherent complexities of this situation. This isn’t simply a business dispute; it’s entwined with the broader political landscape and the ever-present battle for control of narratives.
The assertion that Trump would take action against those spreading “lies” about Tesla raises some significant questions. Defining what constitutes a “lie” in this context is subjective and potentially open to interpretation.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood