President Trump urged President Putin to cease hostilities in Ukraine, advocating for a peace agreement already under consideration. He expressed disappointment over recent Russian missile strikes on Kyiv, questioning Putin’s commitment to ending the conflict. Trump even suggested Putin may be deliberately misleading him and that alternative strategies, including sanctions, might be required. Secretary of State Rubio concurrently highlighted the importance of this week in achieving a potential Ukraine peace deal.
Read More
Former President Trump accused major pollsters, including The New York Times, ABC News/Washington Post, and Fox News, of “election fraud,” citing recent polls showing his approval rating below 50 percent. He claims these polls are intentionally negative and aimed at discrediting him, referencing past instances where polls underestimated his electoral success. Trump’s statement escalates his long-standing attacks on polls he deems unfavorable, further fueling his criticisms of mainstream media. This follows polls showing his approval rating at historic lows for a president at this point in their term, particularly concerning his handling of specific policy issues.
Read More
Despite previously supporting Donald Trump, Joe Rogan recently criticized the president’s deportation policies, specifically condemning the lack of due process. He warned that such actions, exemplified by the Abrego Garcia case, set a dangerous precedent, potentially enabling future abuses of power under different administrations. Rogan’s statement sparked a significant debate on social media, with unexpected support from figures like David Axelrod, who echoed concerns about eroding due process safeguards. This shift in Rogan’s stance highlights the controversial nature of the deportation policies and their broader implications.
Read More
Secretary of State Marco Rubio affirmed President Trump’s repeated assertions that Canada would be better off as a U.S. state, a stance stemming from trade disagreements. This follows Trump’s prior statements, both publicly and privately, suggesting annexation as a solution to perceived unfair trade practices by Canada. Rubio’s comments, made before Canada’s federal election, highlight the ongoing tension and its potential impact on future U.S.-Canada relations. The issue of annexation, while dismissed by Canadian leaders, has significantly influenced the Canadian election and could reshape the countries’ economic relationship.
Read More
History shows tyrants, from Richard III to Muammar Gaddafi, ultimately meet their downfall. Donald Trump, exceeding even historical tyrants in his capacity for harm, currently poses a unique global threat. While impeachment or the 25th Amendment seem unlikely, his policy failures, personal misconduct, and mounting legal challenges, coupled with eroding public support, create vulnerabilities. Ultimately, Trump’s own actions—including reckless foreign policy decisions, rampant corruption, and self-destructive tendencies—could be his undoing.
Read More
Donald Trump’s second term has been marked by erratic behavior and increasingly unbelievable actions, including a public plea to Vladimir Putin and fantastical proposals regarding Canada and Gaza. His erratic foreign policy, characterized by contradictory actions and a lack of serious international engagement, has rendered him a global embarrassment, even as he holds immense power. This lack of seriousness, exemplified by his unrealistic ambitions, has led to a global perception of him as a hapless loser, despite his considerable power and potential to cause further harm. The world largely views Trump’s presidency as a self-inflicted wound, a boon for centrist politicians globally, and a source of embarrassment for fellow right-wing populists.
Read More
President Trump’s attacks on various institutions have revealed stark contrasts in responses. While some, like several major law firms and Disney, succumbed to pressure, making deals or settling lawsuits, others—including Perkins Coie, Harvard University, and the Associated Press—have resisted and filed lawsuits, prioritizing principles over immediate gain. The actions of Republican lawmakers have also varied widely, with some supporting Trump’s actions while others have shown dissent. Ultimately, history will judge those who chose expediency over courage.
Read More
President Trump’s second term has been characterized by a “fuck you, pay me” approach, leveraging intimidation to extract payments from corporations, universities, and even Congress. This strategy, detailed in a recent *Time* magazine cover story, has yielded millions for Trump’s presidential library fund and silenced many critics through fear of retaliation. While some institutions, like Harvard, have resisted, widespread capitulation has allowed Trump to consolidate power despite historically low approval ratings. This behavior mirrors that of notorious mob bosses, raising concerns about a trajectory towards autocracy.
Read More
PublicSquare, a website promoting businesses aligned with Donald Trump’s ideology, has ironically become a tool for boycotts. A Reddit user, leveraging his knowledge of the site gained from prior employment, shared information about PublicSquare, enabling users to identify and avoid businesses supporting Trump. This strategy quickly gained traction across various online platforms, with users utilizing PublicSquare to inform their purchasing decisions, highlighting the power of consumer activism. The unintended consequence has seen PublicSquare’s stock price plummet, though a direct causal link remains unconfirmed.
Read More
Contrary to President Trump’s recent claim that his promise to end the Russia-Ukraine war on “day one” was a joke, a review of his public statements reveals at least 53 instances where he seriously asserted he would resolve the conflict within 24 hours of taking office or even sooner. These comments, made across numerous rallies and interviews in 2023 and 2024, presented a swift resolution to the war as a central element of his presidential platform. He consistently justified this claim by citing his supposed credibility, peacemaking abilities, and relationships with both Putin and Zelensky. This contradicts his later assertion that the statement was made “in jest.”
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker