The Department of Justice has expanded the scope of President Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons to encompass related gun and drug charges stemming from FBI searches conducted during the investigation. This interpretation covers cases like those against Elias Costianes and Daniel Ball, who faced separate gun charges after their arrests for involvement in the Capitol riot. Prosecutors have moved to dismiss these additional charges, citing the pardons’ applicability to offenses connected to the Jan. 6 events. This broader application of the pardons marks a significant shift from the DOJ’s initial stance.
Read More
Following Donald Trump’s reelection, the Justice Department removed a website page detailing January 6th defendants, a move celebrated by insurrectionists and enabling a revisionist narrative. Trump’s pardons and the purging of officials involved in the investigations are framed as “national reconciliation,” despite the extensive evidence documenting the events. However, the extensive documentation from various sources—including court records, the House January 6th Committee report, and citizen archives—ensures that a complete historical record of the insurrection remains accessible, rendering the attempt at historical erasure ultimately futile. While attempts to suppress the truth continue, the enduring evidence will eventually prevail.
Read More
President Trump’s blanket pardons for January 6th rioters encompassed individuals with extensive prior criminal histories, including convictions for violent crimes such as rape, sexual assault of a minor, domestic violence, and manslaughter. These pardons did not erase pre-existing charges or convictions, leaving some defendants still facing prosecution for unrelated offenses. Several cases highlighted the significant criminal records of pardoned individuals, demonstrating that consideration of individual circumstances was absent from the decision-making process. This oversight is further emphasized by ongoing cases against pardoned individuals for crimes ranging from child pornography production to illegal firearm possession.
Read More
President Trump issued a full pardon to former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, building upon his 2020 commutation of Blagojevich’s 14-year prison sentence for attempting to sell Barack Obama’s Senate seat. This pardon removes the legal impediments preventing Blagojevich from seeking public office. The pardon follows Blagojevich’s support of Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, including work with Serbian-American voters. Reports suggest Trump may appoint Blagojevich as the U.S. ambassador to Serbia.
Read More
The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General and the Archivist of the United States to investigate the DOJ’s removal of its January 6th database, which detailed Capitol attack prosecutions. CREW alleges this action violates 44 U.S.C. § 3106, requiring notification to the Archivist of record destruction. The database’s removal, seemingly connected to President Trump’s pardons, has been celebrated by some January 6th defendants but criticized as an attempt to erase evidence. CREW argues the database is a federal record whose deletion requires reporting, which the DOJ seemingly failed to do.
Read More
Over the weekend, the Department of Justice removed all information regarding the January 6th Capitol riot from its website. This action followed President Trump’s pardon of those involved in the riot and aligns with a broader trend of the administration removing content related to controversial issues. The removal includes a database of over 1,200 Capitol breach cases, eliminating access to individual case files and related information. While some press releases remain, the database itself is inaccessible, leaving the reasons behind this action unconfirmed by the Department of Justice.
Read More
Andrew Taake, a January 6th Capitol attacker pardoned by Donald Trump, faces an outstanding charge of soliciting a minor. Trump’s blanket pardon for those involved in the Capitol riot freed Taake from a federal prison sentence for assaulting police. However, a pre-existing state-level charge of soliciting a minor remains unresolved, making Taake a fugitive from Houston authorities. This situation highlights the ongoing controversy surrounding Trump’s pardons and their impact on justice for victims and law enforcement.
Read More
All Senate Democrats co-sponsored a resolution disapproving of President Trump’s pardons for January 6th rioters who assaulted Capitol Police officers. While symbolic and lacking practical effect, the resolution condemns Trump’s action, which pardoned numerous individuals convicted of such crimes, excluding only those charged with seditious conspiracy who received commuted sentences. Republican support for the resolution was absent, with some voicing disapproval of the pardons while others, such as Vice President Vance, defended Trump’s decision. The resolution highlights the partisan divide surrounding Trump’s clemency and the ongoing debate about the January 6th events.
Read More
Jason Riddle, a participant in the January 6th Capitol riot, rejected President Trump’s pardon. Riddle, who served 90 days for stealing a bottle of wine and a book, initially participated believing it was a Trump rally but later realized the severity of his actions after witnessing the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. His experience in prison, and Trump’s later request for protests, led Riddle to abandon his support for the former president. He rejected the pardon to avoid potential future employment issues and to acknowledge the gravity of his actions and their impact on others, particularly Capitol Police officers.
Read More
Following President Trump’s attempt to revise the narrative surrounding the January 6th Capitol attack, a Department of Justice database detailing the extensive criminal charges and convictions related to the event was removed from its website. This searchable database, cataloging the largest criminal investigation in modern DOJ history, disappeared concurrently with Trump’s pardons and efforts to dismiss cases. The removal, celebrated by those convicted, coincided with the silencing of related FBI information, including a “Most Wanted” list of Capitol rioters. While some information remains accessible through alternative sources like court records and press releases, thousands of pages from the database are now unavailable. The timing suggests a deliberate effort to obscure the scale of the January 6th attacks.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker