President Trump pardoned Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Delo, Samuel Reed, and Gregory Dwyer, former executives of the cryptocurrency exchange BitMEX. The pardons follow guilty pleas to violating the Bank Secrecy Act due to the lack of anti-money laundering and know-your-customer programs. Sentences included probation and substantial fines totaling $30 million in civil penalties and a $100 million fine for BitMEX. Delo stated the charges were unwarranted and that the pardon vindicates their position.
Read More
President Trump pardoned Trevor Milton, the founder of Nikola, who was convicted of fraud for exaggerating his company’s technological capabilities. This pardon could negate the hundreds of millions of dollars in restitution Milton owed defrauded investors. Milton’s conviction stemmed from false claims about Nikola’s trucks, including a fabricated video showcasing a prototype. The pardon comes after Milton donated to Trump’s re-election campaign.
Read More
Following President Trump’s blanket pardons for nearly 1,500 January 6th rioters, he now suggests exploring a government compensation fund for these individuals. This proposal follows the estimated $2.7 billion in damages caused by the Capitol riot, for which many rioters faced restitution orders now nullified by the pardons. The idea has sparked significant public outrage, with many criticizing the potential use of taxpayer money to compensate those responsible for the insurrection. Trump maintains that the rioters were unfairly treated and are “patriots.”
Read More
The Department of Justice has expanded the scope of President Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons to encompass related gun and drug charges stemming from FBI searches conducted during the investigation. This interpretation covers cases like those against Elias Costianes and Daniel Ball, who faced separate gun charges after their arrests for involvement in the Capitol riot. Prosecutors have moved to dismiss these additional charges, citing the pardons’ applicability to offenses connected to the Jan. 6 events. This broader application of the pardons marks a significant shift from the DOJ’s initial stance.
Read More
Following Donald Trump’s reelection, the Justice Department removed a website page detailing January 6th defendants, a move celebrated by insurrectionists and enabling a revisionist narrative. Trump’s pardons and the purging of officials involved in the investigations are framed as “national reconciliation,” despite the extensive evidence documenting the events. However, the extensive documentation from various sources—including court records, the House January 6th Committee report, and citizen archives—ensures that a complete historical record of the insurrection remains accessible, rendering the attempt at historical erasure ultimately futile. While attempts to suppress the truth continue, the enduring evidence will eventually prevail.
Read More
President Trump’s blanket pardons for January 6th rioters encompassed individuals with extensive prior criminal histories, including convictions for violent crimes such as rape, sexual assault of a minor, domestic violence, and manslaughter. These pardons did not erase pre-existing charges or convictions, leaving some defendants still facing prosecution for unrelated offenses. Several cases highlighted the significant criminal records of pardoned individuals, demonstrating that consideration of individual circumstances was absent from the decision-making process. This oversight is further emphasized by ongoing cases against pardoned individuals for crimes ranging from child pornography production to illegal firearm possession.
Read More
President Trump issued a full pardon to former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, building upon his 2020 commutation of Blagojevich’s 14-year prison sentence for attempting to sell Barack Obama’s Senate seat. This pardon removes the legal impediments preventing Blagojevich from seeking public office. The pardon follows Blagojevich’s support of Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, including work with Serbian-American voters. Reports suggest Trump may appoint Blagojevich as the U.S. ambassador to Serbia.
Read More
The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General and the Archivist of the United States to investigate the DOJ’s removal of its January 6th database, which detailed Capitol attack prosecutions. CREW alleges this action violates 44 U.S.C. § 3106, requiring notification to the Archivist of record destruction. The database’s removal, seemingly connected to President Trump’s pardons, has been celebrated by some January 6th defendants but criticized as an attempt to erase evidence. CREW argues the database is a federal record whose deletion requires reporting, which the DOJ seemingly failed to do.
Read More
Over the weekend, the Department of Justice removed all information regarding the January 6th Capitol riot from its website. This action followed President Trump’s pardon of those involved in the riot and aligns with a broader trend of the administration removing content related to controversial issues. The removal includes a database of over 1,200 Capitol breach cases, eliminating access to individual case files and related information. While some press releases remain, the database itself is inaccessible, leaving the reasons behind this action unconfirmed by the Department of Justice.
Read More
Andrew Taake, a January 6th Capitol attacker pardoned by Donald Trump, faces an outstanding charge of soliciting a minor. Trump’s blanket pardon for those involved in the Capitol riot freed Taake from a federal prison sentence for assaulting police. However, a pre-existing state-level charge of soliciting a minor remains unresolved, making Taake a fugitive from Houston authorities. This situation highlights the ongoing controversy surrounding Trump’s pardons and their impact on justice for victims and law enforcement.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker