US Representative Al Green’s recent filing of another bill to impeach Donald Trump is sparking a considerable amount of debate. It’s a move that’s prompting many to question the strategy, yet others see it as a necessary action, however futile it might seem.
The act of filing the impeachment bill itself is seen by some as a powerful symbolic gesture. It serves as a clear statement about accountability, documenting who is willing to stand up for democratic principles and who is not. This public display of commitment, some argue, holds significant political weight. It could potentially sway voters and shift political allegiances, helping to turn traditionally Republican seats blue or even galvanize the Democratic party base.… Continue reading
Rep. Shri Thanedar triggered a procedural move to compel a House vote on his seven articles of impeachment against former President Donald Trump. The articles, alleging offenses including obstruction and corruption, were declared privileged, giving House leadership two legislative days to act. A likely motion to table the resolution is expected to effectively end the impeachment effort. Thanedar urged bipartisan support, emphasizing the need to uphold constitutional principles.
Read More
Republicans plan to campaign on the idea that Democrats will impeach President Trump if they win the 2026 midterms, believing voter fatigue on the issue will benefit them. However, recent polling data suggests this strategy may backfire, with a majority of voters, including a significant portion of Republicans, expressing support for impeaching Trump. This support is particularly strong among Democrats and Independents, potentially motivating their turnout. The midterms are expected to be closely contested, with a handful of swing districts likely deciding the outcome.
Read More
Trump’s recent assertion that the GOP should consider expelling Democrats pushing for his impeachment is a striking example of his disregard for democratic norms. The suggestion itself is a blatant power grab, aiming to silence political opposition through intimidation rather than engaging in legitimate political debate. It represents a profound misunderstanding of the fundamental principles of a representative democracy, where dissenting opinions and the right to hold elected officials accountable are paramount.
This call for expulsion ignores the established processes for holding elected officials accountable, namely the impeachment process itself. Impeachment, while a serious matter, is a constitutionally mandated mechanism for addressing potential misconduct by high-ranking officials.… Continue reading
House Democrat unveils articles of impeachment against Trump. This action, while symbolically significant, faces an uphill battle given the current political landscape. The sheer number of potential grounds for impeachment highlights the gravity of the accusations leveled against the former president. Many believe his actions, from tariffs deemed illegal and widely unpopular, to alleged comfort and aid given to insurrectionists, warrant serious consequences.
The 14th Amendment, specifically Section 3, provides a compelling legal argument for impeachment. This section prohibits individuals who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States from holding office. Given the accusations surrounding Trump’s role in the January 6th events and subsequent pardons granted to those involved, this argument carries considerable weight, suggesting a direct violation of the Constitution.… Continue reading
Recent polling data reveals strong support for a third impeachment of President Trump, with 52% of likely voters favoring such action. This support spans the political spectrum, including a significant portion of Independents and even Republicans. The impetus for impeachment stems from alleged violations of constitutional rights and the law, according to a substantial share of respondents. Driven by these findings, and fueled by documented abuses of power, Congressman Thanedar has already filed articles of impeachment, with further action anticipated.
Read More
Representative Shri Thanedar has introduced seven articles of impeachment against former President Donald Trump. These articles allege various constitutional violations, including obstruction of justice, abuse of executive power, and violations of First Amendment rights. The charges also cite usurpation of congressional powers, abuse of trade powers, creation of an unlawful office, and bribery and corruption. Thanedar emphasizes that this action is necessary to protect American democracy and uphold the rule of law, regardless of political affiliation.
Read More
This collection of letters to the editor expresses widespread outrage at the current political climate. Several authors condemn Congressional inaction regarding President Trump’s alleged abuses of power, including the unlawful deportation of a U.S. resident, and urge immediate impeachment. Others criticize the lack of oversight regarding potential conflicts of interest involving Elon Musk and DOGE, as well as Idaho’s recent legislative decisions prioritizing wealthier interests over essential social programs and environmental protection. Finally, several letters praise Boise’s mayor for her defiance of what are seen as oppressive political maneuvers.
Read More
At a town hall, Senator Jon Ossoff acknowledged the impeachable nature of President Trump’s actions, citing examples such as inviting meme coin investors to a private dinner and defying a federal court order. Despite agreeing with a constituent’s desire for impeachment, Ossoff stated that a Democratic House majority is necessary to initiate proceedings. Republican committees criticized Ossoff’s remarks, accusing him of prioritizing impeachment over other issues. This exchange highlights the political reality of needing House support for impeachment and the growing pressure within the Democratic party to pursue more aggressive action against Trump.
Read More
Rep. Thanedar is calling for President Trump’s impeachment due to the deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, despite a Supreme Court order preventing his removal. The Trump administration claims the deportation was an “administrative error,” but has since refused to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return, defying a federal judge’s order. This defiance, according to Thanedar, constitutes an impeachable offense under Article Two of the U.S. Constitution. Further, the Salvadoran President has stated he will not return Abrego Garcia, despite the ongoing legal battle.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker