The FBI’s early morning search of John Bolton’s home, authorized by a court, marks a significant escalation in President Trump’s efforts to prosecute political adversaries, particularly those who have publicly opposed him. This investigation, reportedly related to the alleged leaking of classified information, has been eagerly endorsed by top DOJ and FBI officials via social media, who are attempting to prove their loyalty to the MAGA base. While the current investigation of Bolton is one of several reportedly underway, it reflects a notable shift from Trump’s first term, when such prosecutions were largely unsuccessful, as the DOJ is now more willing to do his bidding. Though the outcome of these probes is uncertain, the active pursuit of Trump’s political foes indicates a clear shift in the DOJ’s stance.
Read More
The Department of Justice has alleged that Smartmatic executives, indicted last year on bribery and money-laundering charges, transferred funds from a 2018 Los Angeles County voting machine contract into slush funds previously used for bribing election officials in Venezuela and the Philippines. Prosecutors are seeking to prove these funds were part of a larger pattern of bribery. Fox News, involved in a separate defamation lawsuit, asserts that LA County’s registrar-recorder, Dean Logan, may have received unreported gifts from the company. This could link to a broader scheme including overcharging customers and using the excess to pay bribes in other countries.
Read More
The judge’s decision to deny the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to unseal Jeffrey Epstein’s records from the criminal case has ignited a flurry of opinions and accusations. It seems like the court is sticking to the rules, as the nature of the records in question – grand jury testimony and exhibits – carries significant legal restrictions on their release. Many observers believe the DOJ’s request was more about public optics than a genuine pursuit of justice. It was designed to create a narrative of thwarted transparency and shift blame to the judiciary.
The legal framework surrounding grand jury information is remarkably strict, making its public disclosure exceptionally rare.… Continue reading
The Department of Justice’s handling of the Ghislaine Maxwell case, particularly her transfer to a minimum-security prison, raises serious questions about preferential treatment. This special treatment given by the Trump administration suggests that a deal was made between Trump’s DOJ and Maxwell. Additionally, the unusual circumstances surrounding the move, coupled with Trump’s history with both Epstein and Maxwell, highlight the potential for obstruction and efforts to shield Trump from any fallout in the Epstein sex scandal. The Justice Department’s reluctance to release potentially incriminating records and the unexplainable interview by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche further supports this conclusion.
Read More
The Trump administration’s actions have severely depleted the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, with over 60% of its workforce gone since January due to firings and resignations. Despite the dwindling resources, the DOJ is actively seeking staff reassignments to address vacancies, particularly in areas related to education, employment, and voting. However, the division’s priorities have shifted to align with the administration’s agenda, focusing on issues such as DEI investigations, voter database accuracy, and perceived voting fraud, while seemingly stepping back from traditional civil rights protections. This loss of experienced litigators may hinder the DOJ’s ability to pursue its ideological lawfare efforts, which could potentially be viewed as a positive outcome.
Read More
In a recent filing, the Department of Justice under Trump asserted that Ghislaine Maxwell should be able to review her trial transcripts before publication, a request the court denied. The filing claims the testimony’s contents could damage Maxwell’s ongoing legal case and therefore, it should be kept confidential. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s recent meeting with Maxwell, potentially concerning the Epstein case, has raised concerns about Maxwell’s motives. Maxwell is currently appealing her conviction before the Supreme Court, seeking to overturn it.
Read More
Attorney General Pam Bondi has initiated a grand jury investigation into the intelligence surrounding President Trump and Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election. This action follows a criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Gabbard’s referral and accompanying declassified files allege suppression and manipulation of intelligence related to Russia’s election interference, sparking controversy and accusations of conspiracy. The Justice Department has not yet commented on the matter, while Democrats dispute the claims made by Gabbard.
Read More
Victims of Jeffrey Epstein are criticizing the Trump administration and the DOJ for seeking to unseal grand jury testimony. The FBI redacted President Donald Trump’s name and those of other prominent figures from the Epstein files, prompting accusations of prioritizing the protection of powerful individuals over victim privacy and justice. Victims have filed letters requesting the DOJ review documents to ensure privacy before release and have questioned the motivations behind the redactions. The case is expected to remain a source of controversy, raising questions about transparency and the handling of sensitive information.
Read More
DOJ is walking back the White House’s goal to arrest 3,000 immigrants per day is a bit of a misleading headline, wouldn’t you say? It’s more like they’re playing a game of semantics and legal maneuvering. The supposed “goal,” which is more accurately described as a quota, seems to magically disappear when they face scrutiny in court. They deny its existence to shield themselves from lawsuits, while the underlying policies remain unchanged. It’s a tactic that raises serious questions about transparency and accountability.
The core issue isn’t just about numbers; it’s about the actual policies that are being implemented. While the administration might publicly deny having a specific quota, the reality on the ground could be quite different.… Continue reading
In the audio drama *Dying for Sex*, Jenny Slate found herself transformed through the experience of portraying a character grappling with a cancer diagnosis. Slate connected deeply with the themes of vulnerability, intimacy, and the complexities of life and death explored in the show. The role pushed her to confront her own fears and uncertainties, ultimately strengthening her sense of self and offering a new perspective on her own life. Through this artistic endeavor, Slate discovered a renewed appreciation for human connection and the profound impact of storytelling.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood