A senior DOJ official was secretly recorded on a fake dating app date alleging the Trump administration is covering up thousands of pages related to the Jeffrey Epstein files by redacting Republican figures. Joseph Schnitt, acting deputy chief at the DOJ’s Office of Enforcement Operations, also claimed Ghislaine Maxwell was given a “benefit” by being transferred to a minimum-security prison. Schnitt stated that the files would be slanted to protect Trump and other conservatives, a claim which the DOJ has denied. The DOJ has since refuted the statements made by Schnitt.
Read More
A Department of Justice official, Joseph Schnitt, was secretly filmed by an employee of the O’Keefe Media Group divulging plans to redact Republican names from Jeffrey Epstein’s client list. The official claimed the department would release a “slanted version” of the files, showcasing a cover-up. Schnitt also detailed internal conflicts regarding the Epstein files, including the decision to move Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum security prison, allegedly to keep her silent. Following the release of the video, the DOJ refuted the claims, stating they had no basis in reality.
Read More
A Department of Justice official, Joseph Schnitt, was secretly recorded on a date discussing plans to manipulate the Epstein files, allegedly redacting information to protect Republicans while highlighting Democratic connections. The recording, released by the O’Keefe Media Group, captured Schnitt detailing an internal conflict between Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino over the handling of the files. The DOJ responded by defending its commitment to transparency and the accuracy of the records. The situation has put Bondi under scrutiny, particularly following the release of files that primarily contained information already in the public domain and has led to accusations of a cover-up.
Read More
A top justice official, Joseph Schnitt, was secretly recorded claiming the Epstein files would be manipulated to protect Republicans by redacting their names. This disclosure was made to a woman he met on a dating app, who was revealed to be an undercover operative. Schnitt also discussed an internal conflict between Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI deputy director Dan Bongino regarding the handling of the files. The Department of Justice responded with damage control measures including a public statement from Schnitt. These revelations have raised questions about transparency and political motivations in the handling of the Epstein case, particularly amidst previous criticisms of Bondi.
Read More
The prospect of the DOJ labeling trans Americans as “mentally defective” to strip them of their Second Amendment rights is deeply troubling, and for a variety of reasons. It’s a move that, if successful, could set a dangerous precedent, opening the door for the erosion of rights for other marginalized groups. The core concern is that this isn’t an isolated incident but a deliberate tactic in a broader pattern of escalating attacks on trans people. The potential for this to escalate is very real, and that should be a cause for concern for everyone.
This potential action by the DOJ, under the direction of the Trump administration and Attorney General Pam Bondi, represents a direct assault on a vulnerable population.… Continue reading
DOJ mulling rule that could restrict transgender individuals from owning guns, according to emerging discussions, is a deeply concerning development that raises fundamental questions about civil rights and the scope of the Second Amendment. It’s as though the very essence of “shall not be infringed” is being tested, not just in theory, but in the lived reality of a vulnerable population. The implications are far-reaching, and the potential consequences are truly unsettling.
If the Justice Department decides to move forward and disqualify transgender individuals from owning firearms, it would rely on a federal law that already restricts people who have been “adjudicated as mental defectives.”… Continue reading
The story of the DOJ deputy chief, Joseph Schnitt, and the alleged plan to redact every Republican from the Epstein client list is, to put it mildly, a bombshell. The core of the issue is this: a high-ranking official, caught on tape, seemingly admitting to a politically motivated cover-up within the Department of Justice. The claim, captured by a far-right media outlet, is that the government intends to scrub the list clean of any names associated with the Republican party, leaving only those linked to Democrats. The immediate reaction is one of outrage and disgust, and, frankly, it’s understandable.
The implications of such an action are staggering.… Continue reading
Following the Minneapolis Catholic church shooting, Justice Department officials are considering proposals to limit transgender people’s firearm rights, potentially building on the narrative that gender dysphoria is a mental illness disqualifying individuals from gun ownership. This consideration represents a significant escalation of the Trump administration’s policies targeting transgender Americans, despite legal hurdles. While the DOJ aims to prevent those with gender dysphoria from obtaining firearms, this potential ban has raised concerns about unfairly targeting a vulnerable population, as well as the implications of defining gender dysphoria as a mental illness for Second Amendment rights. This decision comes as the DOJ has previously targeted gender-affirming care through subpoenas.
Read More
Thousands of Epstein-related records from the DOJ have been released, according to the Oversight Committee, but the excitement is somewhat tempered, and it’s easy to see why. It seems we’re wading through a mountain of information, but the initial reaction suggests a significant portion, perhaps even the vast majority, of this “new” material is old news. We’re talking about information that’s already been out there in the public domain.
Apparently, the contents released, subpoenaed by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, primarily recycle information that’s been readily available for a while. The immediate sentiment, as you might expect, is a mix of disappointment and frustration.… Continue reading
On August 10, 2025, former DOJ employee Sean Charles Dunn allegedly threw a sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer in Washington, D.C. Initially, prosecutors sought a felony assault charge, but after failing to secure a grand jury indictment, they proceeded with a misdemeanor assault charge instead. Dunn was subsequently fired from his position at the DOJ. The U.S. Attorney’s office, led by Jeanine Pirro, is prosecuting the case.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood