In a recent development, President Trump has requested approximately $230 million from the Department of Justice, funded by taxpayers, to cover expenses related to past federal investigations. These claims, filed before his return to the White House, are awaiting a final decision from the DOJ, potentially involving officials who have previously represented individuals connected to Trump. Critics, including congressional Democrats, have condemned this as a corrupt attempt to profit from his office, particularly given the ongoing government shutdown and the potential financial strain on millions of Americans. Investigations into the matter are now underway, with accusations of this being a scheme to loot taxpayers and a direct violation of constitutional principles.
Read More
President Trump’s nomination of Paul Ingrassia to lead the DOJ’s special counsel office is likely to fail following reports of offensive comments made by Ingrassia in a private group chat. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated that Ingrassia’s confirmation is unlikely. The reported remarks include racial slurs and derogatory comments about Martin Luther King Jr., prompting calls for the White House to withdraw the nomination. Despite a scheduled Senate hearing, the nomination faces opposition from both Democrats and key Republicans.
Read More
Former DOJ lawyer Erez Reuveni alleges he was ordered to falsely label Kilmar Abrego García as an MS-13 member and terrorist to prevent his release. Reuveni stated that he could not sign off on the false claims. The incident, as reported by 60 Minutes, highlights concerns regarding due process violations. The Trump administration has been accused of spreading false information about Ábrego García for months, including making inflammatory comparisons to Osama bin Laden.
Read More
Judges don’t trust the DOJ anymore. It’s a stark reality, isn’t it? The bedrock of our justice system, the presumption of good faith in the actions of the Department of Justice, is crumbling. It feels like we’re watching the slow, painful dismantling of a system designed to be impartial, replaced by one that seems increasingly susceptible to political manipulation. This isn’t a new phenomenon, but the intensity and brazenness with which it’s happening now are alarming. We’re seeing a growing bipartisan concern about this very issue.
The erosion of trust is multifaceted. It begins with the simple act of a DOJ lawyer misrepresenting facts in court, or presenting fabricated “evidence”.… Continue reading
U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff denied the Justice Department’s motion for a protective order that would have limited James Comey’s access to discovery, citing that the proposal would hinder the defendant’s ability to prepare for trial. The judge’s decision reinforces his commitment to avoid delays in the case, as evidenced by the swift litigation schedule he set at Comey’s arraignment, including a January 5 trial date. This stance contrasts with the plans of the Trump-installed prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, who has secured a two-count indictment against Comey for allegedly lying to and obstructing Congress. Halligan recently secured an indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose prosecution Trump also called for.
Read More
According to a recent Wall Street Journal report, a Truth Social post from last month, intended as a direct message to Attorney General Pam Bondi, called for the prosecution of political opponents like Letitia James, Adam Schiff, and James Comey. The post, which Trump mistakenly made public, revealed his desire to see his political adversaries brought up on charges and his belief that Erik Siebert was fired for not bringing charges. Critics argue this demonstrates an abuse of power and a pattern of “selective and malicious” prosecutions. Legal analysts suggest this incident could be significant evidence in defense strategies for those targeted, potentially leading to case dismissals.
Read More
The revelation of a message could create significant legal challenges for Trump and the DOJ, potentially providing grounds for James Comey and others to dismiss indictments. Comey’s attorney is reportedly exploring a dismissal based on “vindictive prosecution,” arguing the charges stem from animus rather than legitimate legal reasons. Even though motions for vindictive prosecution are uncommon, Comey’s case is strengthened by Trump’s public animosity. Further communications between Trump and DOJ officials could further demonstrate the prosecution’s vindictiveness.
Read More
Despite the proposed funding, the distribution method remains uncertain, as the law lacks specific criteria for application approval, allocation of funds, and decision-making transparency. Trump’s budget bill includes significant cuts to Medicaid, potentially leading to widespread closures of struggling rural hospitals. These cuts would disproportionately impact rural communities, as more individuals rely on Medicaid coverage in these areas. With a high percentage of rural hospitals operating with negative margins, this strain could force service cuts and ultimately lead to closures.
Read More
The indictment of former FBI Director James Comey has sparked controversy, with some within the Justice Department calling it one of the “worst abuses” in the department’s history. Comey is accused of making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding, charges he denies. The indictment came shortly after former President Donald Trump urged the pursuit of his political foes, including Comey, via social media. Trump has also suggested the indictment was part of a revenge operation against his political opponents.
Read More
DOJ official directs prosecutors to prepare probes of George Soros’ foundation, and this seems to be the focal point of a lot of concern and skepticism. It’s like there’s this immediate reaction of “Here we go again,” a sense of déjà vu mixed with a heavy dose of apprehension. The underlying worry seems to be about the potential for the weaponization of the federal government, a tool used to silence dissent or target political opponents. The fear is that this is not just about one person or one foundation, but a broader pattern of authoritarian tactics, where institutions are used to crush those who disagree with the prevailing ideology.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood