Rep. Jamie Raskin has sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi questioning the Trump Administration’s decision to abruptly end a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s co-conspirators. The investigation, which was active until January 2025, involved nearly 50 survivors who provided detailed information to the SDNY prosecutors and FBI agents, identifying at least 20 co-conspirators. However, the DOJ and FBI closed the case in July 2025, citing a lack of evidence against uncharged third parties, despite the survivors’ credible testimonies and the previous reliance on their information to convict Ghislaine Maxwell. As a result, the House Judiciary Committee is seeking documents related to the investigation and considering reforms to the Crime Victims Rights Act.
Read More
According to a new book excerpt, Justice Department officials believed former President Trump should be arrested after classified documents were found at his Mar-a-Lago estate in August 2022. During the raid, FBI agents recovered numerous top-secret records, leading officials to express concerns about the potential danger if the documents fell into the wrong hands. Initially, Trump avoided charges, but later faced 37 felony counts related to the mishandling of the records before the charges were eventually dismissed. Trump has since asserted the raid was politically motivated and is seeking damages, claiming he was greatly harmed by the investigations.
Read More
The Department of Justice was caught misrepresenting facts to the 9th Circuit regarding the deployment of federal agents in Portland, with claims dramatically inflating the number of officers present. The DOJ initially stated 115 FPS officers were diverted to Portland, but this was incorrect. After being exposed by the plaintiffs, the DOJ issued a correction, admitting to the error without acknowledging any intent to mislead. This falsehood was a key factor in a panel ruling that authorized Trump’s deployment of the National Guard, which was subsequently overturned by the full 9th Circuit, providing an opportunity for reconsideration based on accurate information.
Read More
Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh has been indicted by a federal grand jury along with several other protesters for allegedly blocking vehicles outside an immigration facility in Broadview, Illinois. The charges include conspiracy and forcibly impeding a federal officer, stemming from an incident where an agent was allegedly hindered. Abughazaleh, a vocal critic of immigration policies, faces the charges in a case assigned to Judge April M. Perry, a Biden appointee. The incident occurred amid ongoing tensions and clashes between immigration authorities and protesters in Broadview.
Read More
California will dispatch observers to watch DOJ’s election monitors, and it’s a development that immediately sparks a wave of thoughts and reactions, doesn’t it? It’s the kind of headline that makes you stop and consider the layers involved in ensuring a fair and transparent election process. The phrase “who watches the watchmen” pops into mind, a sentiment that seems to be the very core of this move. We’ve reached a point where scrutiny is paramount, and this action by California is a clear indication of that.
This whole situation brings to the forefront the current political climate, and the underlying distrust that exists.… Continue reading
Trade barriers, while seemingly protective of American jobs initially, ultimately harm the economy. High tariffs can lead to foreign retaliation and the onset of trade wars, resulting in market shrinkage, business closures, and job losses. The path to global prosperity lies in rejecting protectionist measures and embracing fair, free competition. The implementation of tariffs also discourages competition and innovation within domestic industries, further weakening economic health.
Read More
California Governor Gavin Newsom has voiced concern regarding the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) deployment of poll watchers to several California counties, including those requested by the California Republican Party. Newsom suggests this is a prelude to challenging the election results, particularly if Democrats are successful. He further warned of the potential involvement of other federal agencies like ICE and Border Patrol. While local election officials have stated that the presence of election observers is a standard practice, this marks another point of tension between Newsom and the Trump administration, mirroring prior disputes over federal intervention in California.
Read More
In a recent letter, House Democrats Jamie Raskin and Robert Garcia warned President Trump against his efforts to secure $230 million in taxpayer funds from the Department of Justice. The congressmen asserted that such a move is both unconstitutional and illegal, citing the Domestic Emoluments Clause and the Federal Tort Claims Act. Trump is seeking these funds as compensation for past DOJ investigations, requiring approval from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and Civil Division head Stanley Woodward Jr., both of whom have previous ties to Trump. The letter condemns this as an attempt to steal from the American people and demands the White House provide extensive documentation related to the matter.
Read More
Recent Supreme Court decisions have granted the president significant control over the executive branch, effectively allowing President Trump to demand the Justice Department transfer $230 million in taxpayer funds to his personal account. This power stems from the Supreme Court’s reinterpretation of the Constitution under Chief Justice John Roberts, establishing a unitary executive theory. While Trump claims these payments are compensation for investigations into his past actions, the article questions the ethical implications, especially as the DOJ officials involved were formerly Trump’s lawyers. This situation illustrates concerns about corruption and the potential for Trump to exploit this power for personal gain, with further implications if he gains control of other government entities like the Federal Reserve.
Read More
Former President Donald Trump stated the federal government owes him “a lot of money” related to past Justice Department investigations, including the Mar-a-Lago search and the Russia probe. He claimed he would ultimately decide on his own compensation, asserting the decision would “have to go across my desk.” The claims are estimated to be around $230 million in damages. Trump’s attorney argued that the Mar-a-Lago case was a “malicious prosecution” intended to harm his campaign, while the other claim is tied to the Trump-Russia investigation.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood