DOJ

DOJ Defends Missing Epstein Files Deadline, Draws Criticism

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is facing potential legal action for missing the deadline to publish all documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, as mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. While the DOJ continues to review and redact files, exceeding the December 19 deadline, officials defend the process citing the need to protect victim information and avoid jeopardizing ongoing investigations. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche suggests established legal precedent supports the DOJ’s actions, and the department will release files on a rolling basis. Lawmakers, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, are calling for consequences, including lawsuits and contempt proceedings, due to the delay and perceived excessive redactions.

Read More

DOJ Tracked Journalist Covering Epstein: Democrats Demand Answers

Following the release of Jeffrey Epstein files, House Oversight Committee Democrats have requested an explanation from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The request came after a journalist, known for her reporting on Epstein, discovered her flight information from 2019 within the released documents. The Epstein Files Transparency Act mandated the DOJ to publish investigative materials related to Epstein, a process that initially resulted in incomplete and non-searchable files. Despite the ongoing release of additional documents, questions persist regarding the DOJ’s handling of the files and the inclusion of the journalist’s personal information.

Read More

DOJ Accused of Cover-Up: Epstein Files Scrubbed of Trump and Photo

The Department of Justice has come under scrutiny following the removal of 16 photographs from the Jeffrey Epstein archive, including a file allegedly depicting Donald Trump with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Transparency advocates and Democrats are demanding answers, citing the suspicious timing of the redaction shortly after the release of new documents. The DOJ denies any political motives, claiming the removal was due to legal obligations to consult victims, however, the specific removal of file 468 is what has brought heightened scrutiny, fueling accusations of a cover-up. As the DOJ reviews the remaining evidence, the battle over what information is made public is expected to escalate.

Read More

Trump Allies Allegedly Control Epstein Messaging, Sparking Outrage

The White House has reportedly seized control of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) X account to manage the fallout from the release of the Epstein files, a move prompted by negative public relations for President Trump. The DOJ’s handling of the files, including problematic redactions and the release of unverified documents, has drawn criticism and calls for accountability, particularly regarding compliance with the Epstein Transparency Act. One instance includes a fake letter that named Trump. Despite the lack of evidence of wrongdoing, the administration is reportedly frustrated by the ongoing controversy and the remaining 700,000 files still to be reviewed.

Read More

Trump’s “NO MORE” Plea: Epstein Documents Spark Anger and Calls for More

In a recent Truth Social post, former President Trump expressed frustration with the Justice Department’s continued involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein case. He urged the DOJ to cease releasing information about the deceased sex offender and instead focus on alleged election fraud. Trump also demanded the release of names of Democrats connected to Epstein, asserting that they were the primary individuals associated with him. This social media post followed the DOJ’s announcement of discovering over a million more documents related to Epstein, and failing to meet the deadline mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Read More

Users Circumvent Epstein File Redactions with Basic Copy-Paste

A workaround has been discovered, allowing users to view redacted portions of the released Jeffrey Epstein files by copying and pasting them into programs like Google Docs or Microsoft Word. This apparent oversight occurred because the documents, originally redacted in Adobe Acrobat, were simply reproduced from civil litigation. The Justice Department has released a trove of documents containing revealing photos of Epstein with prominent figures, leading to increased scrutiny. Despite a Friday deadline, the DOJ continues to release records on a rolling basis, sparking controversy over redactions and prompting calls for further transparency.

Read More

Trump’s “Beautiful and Cute” Comment to 8-Year-Old Sparks Outrage Amidst Epstein Revelations

During a Christmas Eve tradition, former President Donald Trump took calls from children, including an 8-year-old girl he complimented on her appearance and intelligence. Simultaneously, the Department of Justice was facing criticism for its delayed and incomplete release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein, missing the legal deadline set for their publication. The DOJ attributed the delay to the extensive volume of documents and requested lawyers work through the holiday to expedite the process, sparking further controversy. Critics, including some X users and Republican Representative Thomas Massie, condemned the DOJ’s redactions and failure to meet the deadline.

Read More

Newsom’s Epstein Files “Wrapped” Video Sparks Debate on Trump and Accountability

In a recent social media post, California Governor Gavin Newsom used redacted and unredacted portions of the released Epstein files to criticize Donald Trump. The video juxtaposed redacted pages with footage of Trump and Epstein, highlighting their past relationship and hinting at additional information within the withheld documents. The Department of Justice (DOJ) initially removed photos of Trump from the released files but has since promised to release more documents related to the Epstein case. This move follows the release of documents containing Trump’s name and mentions of his presence on Epstein’s jet, prompting criticism and claims of a Democratic “hoax” from Trump.

Read More

DOJ Uncovers Over 1 Million Potential Epstein Files

The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the discovery of over a million additional documents potentially related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, delaying the release of files initially slated for public release by last Friday. This postponement, due to the need for review and legally required redactions, prompted criticism from lawmakers, including Rep. Robert Garcia, who accused the White House of a cover-up. A bipartisan group of Senators, including Richard Blumenthal, Lisa Murkowski, and Jeff Merkley, also called for an audit of the DOJ’s handling of the files, alleging violations of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandated a full release with minimal redactions by December 19th.

Read More

Garcia Slams White House Over Epstein Files: “Engaged in a Cover-Up”

Following the Department of Justice’s claim of finding a million additional Epstein files, Rep. Robert Garcia criticized the DOJ and the White House, accusing them of a cover-up to protect Epstein’s co-conspirators. He stated the DOJ has illegally withheld documents and called for testimony from Pam Bondi and potential whistleblowers. The DOJ is reviewing these newly discovered documents for release, a process expected to take weeks. The DOJ is also facing challenges, including difficulty finding volunteers to redact the files before release.

Read More