Following a federal appeals court decision, the Justice Department urgently requested the immediate release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This request counters a judge’s ruling delaying release until at least Sunday, a delay the Justice Department deemed erroneous. While the report’s release is currently pending, Trump’s potential Supreme Court appeal could further postpone its publication. The report details evidence supporting the charges against Trump, which were dropped following his election victory but which the Attorney General stated are in the public interest to disclose.
Read More
Trump urges Attorney General Merrick Garland to block the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report, a move that has ignited intense debate. The former president’s request is seen by many as a blatant attempt to suppress potentially damaging information, highlighting a deep-seated distrust in the justice system’s ability to hold powerful individuals accountable.
This request underscores a pattern of behavior where Trump repeatedly attempts to obstruct investigations into his actions. The sheer audacity of the request is remarkable, revealing a profound disregard for transparency and the principles of accountability that should govern public officials. It fuels existing suspicions about a potential cover-up and further erodes public trust.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s lawyers reviewed a draft of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report and threaten legal action if it’s released, arguing Smith lacks the authority to do so due to a prior court ruling deeming his appointment unlawful. Co-defendants Nauta and De Oliveira, citing potential prejudice to their ongoing cases, joined the legal challenge, requesting Judge Cannon block the report’s release. The defense claims the draft presents a biased narrative, and insufficient redactions would further harm their ability to receive a fair trial. While the Justice Department plans to share a redacted version with Congress, Trump’s legal team seeks pre-release notification to pursue legal action.
Read More
Despite substantial evidence from numerous witnesses and text messages indicating former Rep. Matt Gaetz engaged in sex trafficking, prostitution, and drug use, Attorney General Merrick Garland declined prosecution. The Justice Department subsequently hindered congressional investigators’ access to information gathered during their own investigation, citing internal policy. The House Ethics Committee found sufficient evidence that Gaetz violated federal and state laws, including statutory rape, but acknowledged potential legal defenses against sex trafficking charges. This non-prosecution, while legally defensible based on evidentiary challenges, has drawn criticism for appearing to benefit a politically connected individual.
Read More
Legal Eagle, Devin Stone, has sued the FBI and DOJ to compel the release of their findings in the dropped federal criminal cases against President-elect Trump. The lawsuit, filed after a denied FOIA request, seeks to preserve records before potential destruction or alteration by the incoming administration. Stone’s concerns center on the potential for a cover-up, citing Trump’s plans to replace investigators with loyalists and his stated intention to rewrite history. The lawsuit aims to uncover information about potential co-conspirators and the full extent of Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents.
Read More
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s tenure has been marked by highly controversial actions, drawing criticism from across the political spectrum. These include the DOJ’s attempts to prosecute Donald Trump while simultaneously shielding President Biden from similar accusations, the controversial raid on Mar-a-Lago, and the targeting of parents protesting school policies. Further fueling discontent, the DOJ has been accused of ignoring subpoenas, prosecuting political opponents more aggressively than those aligned with the administration, and interfering with investigations into the Biden family. The cumulative effect of these actions has severely damaged public trust in the DOJ and the FBI.
Read More
Trump’s plan to dismiss Jack Smith’s team and launch a Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation into the 2020 election appears to be a thinly veiled attempt at retribution. This action, if carried out, would represent a profound misuse of government resources and a blatant disregard for the rule of law. The 2020 election has already been extensively investigated and litigated; numerous court cases have rejected claims of widespread fraud. Reactivating this issue solely to target political opponents suggests a prioritization of personal vendettas over the impartial administration of justice.
Trump’s proposed action raises significant concerns about the potential for political interference in the DOJ.… Continue reading
Following Trump’s reelection victory, numerous current and former high-ranking Justice Department and FBI officials are seeking legal counsel, anticipating criminal investigations by the Trump administration. The appointment of Matt Gaetz, a Trump ally previously under FBI investigation, to a leadership position within the department significantly heightened concerns among these officials. While these officials maintain their actions were lawful, they brace for potentially lengthy and expensive legal battles, fueled by Trump’s stated intention to retaliate against those who investigated him. Legal experts suggest Trump’s aim is to intimidate and neutralize any opposition to his actions, potentially using minor offenses to harass and discredit his perceived enemies.
Read More
Elon Musk’s recent encounter with the Department of Justice (DOJ) serves as a stark reminder of the glaring double standards that permeate the fabric of our society. Paying people to vote, as he allegedly attempted to do, is not just unethical; it’s a crime that carries a hefty sentence. A reminder that this kind of behavior is punishable by up to five years in prison is laughable when contrasted with the reality that most of us face. If I were to engage in similar actions, I’d likely be facing charges and potential prison time instead of receiving a mere warning. It’s infuriating to witness such an obvious disconnect in how the law is enforced based on wealth and status.… Continue reading
“It made me angry”: Melania Trump complains to Fox News that DOJ ‘went through my stuff’
Melania Trump, the former First Lady of the United States, recently expressed her anger in an interview with Fox News about the Department of Justice executing a search warrant at her residence. As I read through the comments and reactions online, I can see a mix of cynicism, criticism, and even mockery directed towards Melania. While some may find it easy to dismiss her complaints due to her association with a controversial figure like former President Donald Trump, I believe there are deeper issues at play here.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood