The revelation of a message could create significant legal challenges for Trump and the DOJ, potentially providing grounds for James Comey and others to dismiss indictments. Comey’s attorney is reportedly exploring a dismissal based on “vindictive prosecution,” arguing the charges stem from animus rather than legitimate legal reasons. Even though motions for vindictive prosecution are uncommon, Comey’s case is strengthened by Trump’s public animosity. Further communications between Trump and DOJ officials could further demonstrate the prosecution’s vindictiveness.
Read More
Despite the proposed funding, the distribution method remains uncertain, as the law lacks specific criteria for application approval, allocation of funds, and decision-making transparency. Trump’s budget bill includes significant cuts to Medicaid, potentially leading to widespread closures of struggling rural hospitals. These cuts would disproportionately impact rural communities, as more individuals rely on Medicaid coverage in these areas. With a high percentage of rural hospitals operating with negative margins, this strain could force service cuts and ultimately lead to closures.
Read More
The indictment of former FBI Director James Comey has sparked controversy, with some within the Justice Department calling it one of the “worst abuses” in the department’s history. Comey is accused of making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding, charges he denies. The indictment came shortly after former President Donald Trump urged the pursuit of his political foes, including Comey, via social media. Trump has also suggested the indictment was part of a revenge operation against his political opponents.
Read More
DOJ official directs prosecutors to prepare probes of George Soros’ foundation, and this seems to be the focal point of a lot of concern and skepticism. It’s like there’s this immediate reaction of “Here we go again,” a sense of déjà vu mixed with a heavy dose of apprehension. The underlying worry seems to be about the potential for the weaponization of the federal government, a tool used to silence dissent or target political opponents. The fear is that this is not just about one person or one foundation, but a broader pattern of authoritarian tactics, where institutions are used to crush those who disagree with the prevailing ideology.… Continue reading
A federal judge has ordered prosecutors to respond to allegations that Trump administration officials violated Local Criminal Rule 23.1 with social media posts concerning Luigi Mangione’s case, potentially infringing upon his right to a fair trial. The judge cited posts from high-ranking DOJ staff members that appeared to violate the rule, which restricts non-lawyer personnel from releasing opinions that could prejudice a trial. Specifically, the posts referenced Mangione’s alleged guilt in the shooting of Brian Thompson. The court warned that future violations, particularly those falsely linking Mangione to unrelated violent incidents, may result in sanctions and ordered the DOJ to respond.
Read More
DOJ official ordered to rescind inquiry to FBI agent who sued Alex Jones: Sources is a story that, on the surface, feels complex, but when you break it down, it reveals a disturbing pattern. It seems we have a situation where a Department of Justice official, Ed Martin, was instructed to back off on an inquiry targeting a retired FBI agent. This agent had previously sued Alex Jones and secured a significant financial judgment against him.
The details, as presented, suggest that Martin, seemingly acting on behalf of Alex Jones, attempted to intimidate or influence the retired agent through an inquiry that hinted at potential criminal charges.… Continue reading
Trump’s pressure on Bondi, as Schumer suggests, is indeed a critical juncture, one that arguably signifies a dangerous trajectory for American democracy. The core concern stems from Trump’s public demand that Attorney General Pam Bondi take action against his perceived political enemies. This isn’t just a simple political squabble; it’s a blatant attempt to weaponize the Department of Justice, turning it into an instrument of personal retribution and political persecution. The implications of such actions are chilling.
This behavior echoes patterns seen throughout history in nations that ultimately succumbed to authoritarianism. Countries such as Italy, Spain, Cuba, Germany, and many others, all slipped down the slippery slope to dictatorship, fueled by leaders granting themselves immunity from prosecution, curtailing freedom of the press, and suppressing dissent.… Continue reading
DOJ quietly removes study showing right wing attacks ‘outpace’ those by left
The revelation that the Department of Justice (DOJ) quietly removed a study from its website highlighting the disparity between right-wing and left-wing domestic terrorism is, frankly, concerning. The study, conducted by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), reportedly showed a significant imbalance, with right-wing incidents far outpacing those originating from the left. The very act of removing such research raises eyebrows and invites questions about transparency and the potential suppression of inconvenient truths. The fact that the archived version of the study is still accessible via the Wayback Machine, a digital preservation tool, is a testament to the enduring power of the internet and the difficulty of completely erasing information.… Continue reading
Following the assassination of right-wing political commentator Charlie Kirk, the U.S. Department of Justice removed a study from its website concerning the frequency of “far-right attacks.” The study, which remains accessible through the Wayback Machine, concluded that far-right extremists have committed significantly more ideologically motivated homicides than those on the left. The study’s removal occurred after Kirk’s death on September 10, 2025, during a speaking event. Former President Donald Trump later commented on the situation, stating that the radicals on the left are the problem, and they are vicious and horrible.
Read More
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has removed a study detailing that white supremacist and far-right violence remains the most prevalent form of terrorism and domestic violent extremism in the United States. The study, conducted by the National Institute of Justice, was hosted on a DOJ website until at least September 12, 2025, according to archived records. A message now appears on the webpage where the study was hosted, indicating a review of websites and materials is underway, citing recent Executive Orders and related guidance. During this review, some content may be unavailable.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood