DOJ

Trump Requests DOJ Probe of Clinton, Epstein Links

Following the impending release of Epstein files by the House, President Trump has requested the Department of Justice to investigate Epstein’s connections to prominent Democrats, including Bill Clinton. This shift in strategy comes after months of attempts to downplay the case and has led to an investigation being led by Jay Clayton. The move is seen as an attempt to deflect from his own vulnerabilities as pressure mounts for transparency, even among some Republican house members. Despite this, it is unclear if the Trump administration will follow through with his promise.

Read More

Epstein Emails: Ghislaine Maxwell Lied to Protect Trump, Per New Revelations

Newly released emails directly contradict Ghislaine Maxwell’s statements to the Justice Department, exposing her false claims about Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. In a July interview, Maxwell stated she had never seen Trump at Epstein’s residence and did not witness him in any inappropriate situations. These emails further illustrate Maxwell’s pattern of deception and attempts to downplay the extent of connections. The full implications of these contradictions are still developing as investigations continue.

Read More

FBI Informant Who Lied About Bidens Secretly Released From Jail

Following the indictment, Smirnov revealed contact with high-ranking Russian officials, raising flight risk concerns. Despite a prior rejection, the DOJ’s initial attempt to release Smirnov pending appeal has sparked speculation about a potential pardon. Legal experts suggest this unusual move by the DOJ could indicate the Trump administration’s consideration of clemency. This is especially concerning given Smirnov’s alleged improper connections.

Read More

DOJ Fires Immigration Judges: Calls for Name Change and Reform

Several immigration judges with backgrounds in immigrant defense have been terminated by the Department of Justice, often without explanation, during their probationary period. These firings have occurred in the midst of ongoing immigration court proceedings and often target judges at the end of their two-year trial period. The firings have prompted concerns, and an analysis shows that judges with prior experience defending immigrants have been disproportionately affected. The DOJ maintains it does not target judges based on experience, while the ongoing terminations and subsequent hiring practices suggest a shift towards judges with backgrounds in enforcement.

Read More

Raskin Reveals Trump DOJ Shut Down of Epstein Co-Conspirator Probe, Demands Answers

Rep. Jamie Raskin has sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi questioning the Trump Administration’s decision to abruptly end a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s co-conspirators. The investigation, which was active until January 2025, involved nearly 50 survivors who provided detailed information to the SDNY prosecutors and FBI agents, identifying at least 20 co-conspirators. However, the DOJ and FBI closed the case in July 2025, citing a lack of evidence against uncharged third parties, despite the survivors’ credible testimonies and the previous reliance on their information to convict Ghislaine Maxwell. As a result, the House Judiciary Committee is seeking documents related to the investigation and considering reforms to the Crime Victims Rights Act.

Read More

DOJ Official Admits Trump Should Be Imprisoned

According to a new book excerpt, Justice Department officials believed former President Trump should be arrested after classified documents were found at his Mar-a-Lago estate in August 2022. During the raid, FBI agents recovered numerous top-secret records, leading officials to express concerns about the potential danger if the documents fell into the wrong hands. Initially, Trump avoided charges, but later faced 37 felony counts related to the mishandling of the records before the charges were eventually dismissed. Trump has since asserted the raid was politically motivated and is seeking damages, claiming he was greatly harmed by the investigations.

Read More

DOJ Admits Error After Lying in Trump Case, Court Reverses Ruling

The Department of Justice was caught misrepresenting facts to the 9th Circuit regarding the deployment of federal agents in Portland, with claims dramatically inflating the number of officers present. The DOJ initially stated 115 FPS officers were diverted to Portland, but this was incorrect. After being exposed by the plaintiffs, the DOJ issued a correction, admitting to the error without acknowledging any intent to mislead. This falsehood was a key factor in a panel ruling that authorized Trump’s deployment of the National Guard, which was subsequently overturned by the full 9th Circuit, providing an opportunity for reconsideration based on accurate information.

Read More

DOJ Indicts Democratic Candidate Kat Abughazaleh Over ICE Protest, Sparking Controversy

Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh has been indicted by a federal grand jury along with several other protesters for allegedly blocking vehicles outside an immigration facility in Broadview, Illinois. The charges include conspiracy and forcibly impeding a federal officer, stemming from an incident where an agent was allegedly hindered. Abughazaleh, a vocal critic of immigration policies, faces the charges in a case assigned to Judge April M. Perry, a Biden appointee. The incident occurred amid ongoing tensions and clashes between immigration authorities and protesters in Broadview.

Read More

California to Deploy Observers to Monitor DOJ Election Monitors

California will dispatch observers to watch DOJ’s election monitors, and it’s a development that immediately sparks a wave of thoughts and reactions, doesn’t it? It’s the kind of headline that makes you stop and consider the layers involved in ensuring a fair and transparent election process. The phrase “who watches the watchmen” pops into mind, a sentiment that seems to be the very core of this move. We’ve reached a point where scrutiny is paramount, and this action by California is a clear indication of that.

This whole situation brings to the forefront the current political climate, and the underlying distrust that exists.… Continue reading

Trump DOJ Plans to “Monitor” Blue State Polls Sparks Outrage

Trade barriers, while seemingly protective of American jobs initially, ultimately harm the economy. High tariffs can lead to foreign retaliation and the onset of trade wars, resulting in market shrinkage, business closures, and job losses. The path to global prosperity lies in rejecting protectionist measures and embracing fair, free competition. The implementation of tariffs also discourages competition and innovation within domestic industries, further weakening economic health.

Read More