Democrats are expressing a strong desire, bordering on an urgent demand, for investigations and potential prosecutions of former Trump administration officials. The sentiment is clear: a feeling that significant corruption has been on display and that failure to hold individuals accountable would be a profound dereliction of duty. There’s a palpable frustration with the notion of “perhaps” when it comes to these investigations, with many feeling that the groundwork should have been laid long ago, and that the country cannot afford to “put it all behind us” once more. The call is for concrete action, for prosecutions to be a stated campaign promise, not a vague possibility.… Continue reading
A federal appellate panel expressed strong skepticism regarding the disciplinary action against Senator Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., for his remarks on troops refusing illegal orders. The judges questioned the Department of Justice’s argument that Kelly’s statement, “you can refuse illegal orders,” was intended to encourage disobedience of lawful orders. The panel highlighted that Kelly’s statement aligns with military training and questioned the basis for the Defense Secretary’s inference of intent, particularly since Kelly is a retired service member.
Read More
CBS’s chief Washington correspondent questioned acting Attorney General Todd Blanche about the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, highlighting a similar social media post made by MAGA influencer Jack Posobiec in 2022 that did not result in prosecution. The comparison arises because Comey was indicted by the Trump Justice Department for a post interpreted as a threat to President Trump, while Posobiec’s post, seen as a similar threat to President Biden, went unaddressed by the Biden Justice Department. Blanche defended the indictment, asserting that each case is investigated independently and that a similar post does not automatically lead to charges.
Read More
This article excerpt highlights Donald Trump’s assertion that the term “86” is a mob slang for “kill him.” According to Trump, the mafia uses this phrase specifically when intending to eliminate someone. He further elaborated that “86 the son of a gun” is the colloquial expression employed by mobsters to convey such a lethal intent.
Read More
A federal grand jury has indicted former FBI Director James Comey for arranging seashells on a beach to spell “86 47,” with charges of making and transmitting threats against the president. This action follows a previous, flawed attempt to indict Comey for false statements, which was dismissed due to procedural errors. The current indictment is criticized for misstating the law regarding threats and for including an unusual forfeiture notice, raising concerns about its frivolous nature and potential chilling effect on civil liberties.
Read More
The conviction of nine activists on terrorism charges in Texas sets a concerning precedent, allowing the Trump administration to target leftwing groups and label them as domestic terrorists. While the administration framed the verdict as a victory against “antifa,” legal experts note the terrorism charges focused narrowly on specific criminal acts rather than organizational ties or ideology. Concerns have been raised that the prosecution may have criminalized common practices like using secure messaging apps or reading certain literature, potentially chilling free speech and assembly. This case highlights how easily conspiracy charges can be constructed, and experts predict the government is likely to pursue similar prosecutions against individuals perceived to be associated with “antifa.”
Read More
Federal Judge James Boasberg quashed two grand jury subpoenas against Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, citing ample evidence of harassment and coercion rather than legitimate wrongdoing. The judge found that the subpoenas were intended to pressure Powell into lowering interest rates, pointing to numerous social media posts and statements as proof of improper motive. Despite the government’s claims of legitimate purpose, Boasberg noted prosecutors declined to provide further evidence, highlighting a pattern of questionable investigations within the Justice Department. The US attorney announced an appeal, but the judge’s decision exposed the department’s compromised independence under presidential influence.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker