The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating protesters in Minnesota who disrupted services at a church where a local ICE official serves as a pastor. The protesters, organized by Black Lives Matter Minnesota, interrupted the service to protest the ICE official and the agency’s actions, including the recent fatal shooting of a woman by an ICE agent. The DOJ is investigating potential federal civil rights violations, while protest organizers criticize the investigation, viewing it as a distraction from federal agents’ actions. The ICE official defended the agency’s tactics in a court filing, stating crowd control devices were needed to protect agents from increased threats.
Read More
The subject matter at hand revolves around the Justice Department’s stance against appointing a special master to oversee the release of the Epstein files. It’s a complex situation, and it seems the general sentiment is one of frustration and suspicion, to put it mildly. The DOJ is essentially arguing against outside oversight, and that immediately raises eyebrows, especially considering the sensitive nature of the documents and the prominent figures potentially implicated.
The crux of the matter is the fear that something nefarious is being protected. The DOJ’s arguments against a special master seem weak and contrived, fueling the idea of a cover-up.… Continue reading
The Justice Department has stated that a judge does not have the authority to appoint a neutral expert to oversee the public release of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. This response was given in a letter to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, rejecting a request from Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who co-sponsored the Epstein Files Transparency Act, citing concerns about the slow release of documents and potential criminal violations in the process. The Justice Department maintains that the representatives lack standing in the case to seek such relief, specifically because they are not parties to the criminal case. The Department expects to update the court soon about the progress of the release, attributing the slow down to the redactions of sensitive information.
Read More
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has reported “substantial progress” in its review of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, with over 500 individuals assigned to the task, including redactions. Despite the efforts, the review has experienced “inevitable glitches” due to the high volume of materials. The DOJ stated that the materials reviewed and redacted thus far include sensitive victim information and the department is coordinating resources across various offices using a centralized platform. The agency has already released 12,285 documents and has over two million documents undergoing review, with an additional five million records being reviewed.
Read More
During a hearing in a Minnesota federal court, a Department of Justice attorney argued that observing police does not receive First Amendment protection. This assertion was made in response to a lawsuit by Minnesota protesters who claimed immigration agents arrested, pepper-sprayed, and intimidated them. The attorney cited a 2023 ruling to support his argument. Judge Katherine Menendez, overseeing the case, questioned the legality of federal law enforcement stopping protesters following them in vehicles.
Read More
Four leaders of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, including the section chief, resigned in protest over the handling of an ICE officer’s fatal shooting of a motorist in Minneapolis. These departures stemmed from Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon’s decision not to investigate the shooting, despite the division’s typical role in such cases involving law enforcement use of force. Sources indicate that this decision, coupled with other concerns about division leadership, led to the resignations, marking a significant mass departure within the department. The FBI has taken over the investigation, while Democrats accuse the Trump administration of covering up the details of the shooting.
Read More
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell announced that the US Department of Justice is threatening him with criminal charges, which he condemned as intimidation for not adhering to President Trump’s interest rate policy demands. Powell stated that grand jury subpoenas were served related to his congressional testimony on Fed office building renovations, but asserted that the accusations are a pretext for political pressure. The charges, Powell claims, are a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on economic assessments rather than presidential preferences. Democratic members of Congress have come to Powell’s defense, accusing Trump of undermining the rule of law.
Read More
The Justice Department has subpoenaed the Federal Reserve, prompting President Trump to deny any knowledge of the investigation while also criticizing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Powell responded by stating the Justice Department is threatening possible criminal indictment related to his Senate testimony about renovations, viewing it as part of the administration’s pressure campaign to lower interest rates. This move follows Trump’s prior expressions of considering legal action against Powell. The investigation has drawn criticism from senators, with some vowing to oppose future Trump nominees for the Fed until the matter is resolved.
Read More
Following the announcement of a criminal probe into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski called for a congressional investigation into the Department of Justice, viewing the probe as an attempt to pressure the central bank into lowering interest rates. The controversy stems from a DOJ investigation focusing on Powell’s June congressional testimony regarding the Fed’s building renovation costs. Several lawmakers have pledged to block President Trump’s Federal Reserve nominees until the matter is resolved, citing concerns that political interference could undermine the Fed’s independence. This action is viewed as a significant escalation in Trump’s ongoing campaign against Powell and the Fed’s monetary policy.
Read More
The Justice Department’s revised indictment of Nicolás Maduro, while still accusing him of “narco-terrorism” and drug trafficking, now describes the Cártel de los Soles as a “patronage system” rather than a literal organization. This shift contrasts with the original 2020 indictment and highlights inconsistencies within the government, as the Treasury and State Departments continue to designate Cártel de los Soles as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. This designation is key for Trump, who has been using it rhetorically to justify policies, like the summary execution of suspected drug smugglers, blurring the lines between drug trafficking and violent aggression. Critics argue that the FTO label is being applied loosely, even when it lacks a strong legal or factual basis, particularly in cases like Cártel de los Soles.
Read More
DOJ to Press Charges After Activists Disrupt Church of ICE Official
The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating protesters in Minnesota who disrupted services at a church where a local ICE official serves as a pastor. The protesters, organized by Black Lives Matter Minnesota, interrupted the service to protest the ICE official and the agency’s actions, including the recent fatal shooting of a woman by an ICE agent. The DOJ is investigating potential federal civil rights violations, while protest organizers criticize the investigation, viewing it as a distraction from federal agents’ actions. The ICE official defended the agency’s tactics in a court filing, stating crowd control devices were needed to protect agents from increased threats.
Read More
DOJ Opposes Special Master for Epstein Files, Fuels Cover-Up Allegations
The subject matter at hand revolves around the Justice Department’s stance against appointing a special master to oversee the release of the Epstein files. It’s a complex situation, and it seems the general sentiment is one of frustration and suspicion, to put it mildly. The DOJ is essentially arguing against outside oversight, and that immediately raises eyebrows, especially considering the sensitive nature of the documents and the prominent figures potentially implicated.
The crux of the matter is the fear that something nefarious is being protected. The DOJ’s arguments against a special master seem weak and contrived, fueling the idea of a cover-up.… Continue reading
DOJ: Congress Cannot Intervene in Epstein File Release
The Justice Department has stated that a judge does not have the authority to appoint a neutral expert to oversee the public release of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. This response was given in a letter to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, rejecting a request from Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who co-sponsored the Epstein Files Transparency Act, citing concerns about the slow release of documents and potential criminal violations in the process. The Justice Department maintains that the representatives lack standing in the case to seek such relief, specifically because they are not parties to the criminal case. The Department expects to update the court soon about the progress of the release, attributing the slow down to the redactions of sensitive information.
Read More
Epstein Files: Pam Bondi Cites “Glitches” in DOJ Review, Faces Scrutiny
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has reported “substantial progress” in its review of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, with over 500 individuals assigned to the task, including redactions. Despite the efforts, the review has experienced “inevitable glitches” due to the high volume of materials. The DOJ stated that the materials reviewed and redacted thus far include sensitive victim information and the department is coordinating resources across various offices using a centralized platform. The agency has already released 12,285 documents and has over two million documents undergoing review, with an additional five million records being reviewed.
Read More
DOJ Argues Against Protestor Right to Observe Immigration Agents: Outrage and Accusations of Overreach
During a hearing in a Minnesota federal court, a Department of Justice attorney argued that observing police does not receive First Amendment protection. This assertion was made in response to a lawsuit by Minnesota protesters who claimed immigration agents arrested, pepper-sprayed, and intimidated them. The attorney cited a 2023 ruling to support his argument. Judge Katherine Menendez, overseeing the case, questioned the legality of federal law enforcement stopping protesters following them in vehicles.
Read More
DOJ Officials Quit After Division Refuses ICE Shooting Probe
Four leaders of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, including the section chief, resigned in protest over the handling of an ICE officer’s fatal shooting of a motorist in Minneapolis. These departures stemmed from Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon’s decision not to investigate the shooting, despite the division’s typical role in such cases involving law enforcement use of force. Sources indicate that this decision, coupled with other concerns about division leadership, led to the resignations, marking a significant mass departure within the department. The FBI has taken over the investigation, while Democrats accuse the Trump administration of covering up the details of the shooting.
Read More
Powell Defies Trump “Intimidation” as DOJ Launches Probe: Analysis
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell announced that the US Department of Justice is threatening him with criminal charges, which he condemned as intimidation for not adhering to President Trump’s interest rate policy demands. Powell stated that grand jury subpoenas were served related to his congressional testimony on Fed office building renovations, but asserted that the accusations are a pretext for political pressure. The charges, Powell claims, are a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on economic assessments rather than presidential preferences. Democratic members of Congress have come to Powell’s defense, accusing Trump of undermining the rule of law.
Read More
Trump Denies Involvement in DOJ Subpoenas: “I Don’t Know Anything About It”
The Justice Department has subpoenaed the Federal Reserve, prompting President Trump to deny any knowledge of the investigation while also criticizing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Powell responded by stating the Justice Department is threatening possible criminal indictment related to his Senate testimony about renovations, viewing it as part of the administration’s pressure campaign to lower interest rates. This move follows Trump’s prior expressions of considering legal action against Powell. The investigation has drawn criticism from senators, with some vowing to oppose future Trump nominees for the Fed until the matter is resolved.
Read More
Republican Senator Murkowski Calls for Probe into Trump’s DOJ
Following the announcement of a criminal probe into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski called for a congressional investigation into the Department of Justice, viewing the probe as an attempt to pressure the central bank into lowering interest rates. The controversy stems from a DOJ investigation focusing on Powell’s June congressional testimony regarding the Fed’s building renovation costs. Several lawmakers have pledged to block President Trump’s Federal Reserve nominees until the matter is resolved, citing concerns that political interference could undermine the Fed’s independence. This action is viewed as a significant escalation in Trump’s ongoing campaign against Powell and the Fed’s monetary policy.
Read More
DOJ’s Shift: Why Maduro Isn’t Labeled a Drug Cartel Head Anymore
The Justice Department’s revised indictment of Nicolás Maduro, while still accusing him of “narco-terrorism” and drug trafficking, now describes the Cártel de los Soles as a “patronage system” rather than a literal organization. This shift contrasts with the original 2020 indictment and highlights inconsistencies within the government, as the Treasury and State Departments continue to designate Cártel de los Soles as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. This designation is key for Trump, who has been using it rhetorically to justify policies, like the summary execution of suspected drug smugglers, blurring the lines between drug trafficking and violent aggression. Critics argue that the FTO label is being applied loosely, even when it lacks a strong legal or factual basis, particularly in cases like Cártel de los Soles.
Read More