A new poll reveals low public confidence in the impartiality of the Department of Justice and FBI under a second Trump administration, with only about 20% expressing “extreme” or “very” confidence. This skepticism extends to several of Trump’s controversial Cabinet nominees, including those for Attorney General, FBI Director, and Secretary of Defense, who are viewed negatively by a majority of Americans. While some nominees, particularly Robert F. Kennedy Jr., enjoy higher approval ratings among Republicans, significant portions of the public remain unfamiliar with the selected individuals. The poll highlights the challenge Trump faces in restoring public trust in law enforcement and his chosen leadership.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report details the investigation into President-elect Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, concluding that sufficient evidence existed for conviction. However, Trump’s subsequent election rendered prosecution impossible due to Department of Justice policy against indicting sitting presidents. The report also reveals consideration of more serious charges under the Insurrection Act, ultimately forgone. Despite Trump’s legal challenges and claims of a politically motivated investigation, the report was released, detailing threats against witnesses and officials stemming from Trump’s public statements.
Read More
A judge has ruled that the Department of Justice (DOJ) can release Jack Smith’s final report on his January 6th case against Donald Trump. This decision comes after a period of legal wrangling, and it represents a significant development in the ongoing saga surrounding the former president and the events leading up to and during the Capitol riot.
The ruling clears the path for the public to finally access the details of Smith’s investigation into Trump’s alleged actions in the lead-up to and during the January 6th insurrection. This has been a highly anticipated event, with many eagerly awaiting the release of the report to understand the full scope of the findings.… Continue reading
Following a federal appeals court decision, the Justice Department urgently requested the immediate release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This request counters a judge’s ruling delaying release until at least Sunday, a delay the Justice Department deemed erroneous. While the report’s release is currently pending, Trump’s potential Supreme Court appeal could further postpone its publication. The report details evidence supporting the charges against Trump, which were dropped following his election victory but which the Attorney General stated are in the public interest to disclose.
Read More
Trump urges Attorney General Merrick Garland to block the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report, a move that has ignited intense debate. The former president’s request is seen by many as a blatant attempt to suppress potentially damaging information, highlighting a deep-seated distrust in the justice system’s ability to hold powerful individuals accountable.
This request underscores a pattern of behavior where Trump repeatedly attempts to obstruct investigations into his actions. The sheer audacity of the request is remarkable, revealing a profound disregard for transparency and the principles of accountability that should govern public officials. It fuels existing suspicions about a potential cover-up and further erodes public trust.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s lawyers reviewed a draft of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report and threaten legal action if it’s released, arguing Smith lacks the authority to do so due to a prior court ruling deeming his appointment unlawful. Co-defendants Nauta and De Oliveira, citing potential prejudice to their ongoing cases, joined the legal challenge, requesting Judge Cannon block the report’s release. The defense claims the draft presents a biased narrative, and insufficient redactions would further harm their ability to receive a fair trial. While the Justice Department plans to share a redacted version with Congress, Trump’s legal team seeks pre-release notification to pursue legal action.
Read More
Despite substantial evidence from numerous witnesses and text messages indicating former Rep. Matt Gaetz engaged in sex trafficking, prostitution, and drug use, Attorney General Merrick Garland declined prosecution. The Justice Department subsequently hindered congressional investigators’ access to information gathered during their own investigation, citing internal policy. The House Ethics Committee found sufficient evidence that Gaetz violated federal and state laws, including statutory rape, but acknowledged potential legal defenses against sex trafficking charges. This non-prosecution, while legally defensible based on evidentiary challenges, has drawn criticism for appearing to benefit a politically connected individual.
Read More
Legal Eagle, Devin Stone, has sued the FBI and DOJ to compel the release of their findings in the dropped federal criminal cases against President-elect Trump. The lawsuit, filed after a denied FOIA request, seeks to preserve records before potential destruction or alteration by the incoming administration. Stone’s concerns center on the potential for a cover-up, citing Trump’s plans to replace investigators with loyalists and his stated intention to rewrite history. The lawsuit aims to uncover information about potential co-conspirators and the full extent of Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents.
Read More
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s tenure has been marked by highly controversial actions, drawing criticism from across the political spectrum. These include the DOJ’s attempts to prosecute Donald Trump while simultaneously shielding President Biden from similar accusations, the controversial raid on Mar-a-Lago, and the targeting of parents protesting school policies. Further fueling discontent, the DOJ has been accused of ignoring subpoenas, prosecuting political opponents more aggressively than those aligned with the administration, and interfering with investigations into the Biden family. The cumulative effect of these actions has severely damaged public trust in the DOJ and the FBI.
Read More
Trump’s plan to dismiss Jack Smith’s team and launch a Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation into the 2020 election appears to be a thinly veiled attempt at retribution. This action, if carried out, would represent a profound misuse of government resources and a blatant disregard for the rule of law. The 2020 election has already been extensively investigated and litigated; numerous court cases have rejected claims of widespread fraud. Reactivating this issue solely to target political opponents suggests a prioritization of personal vendettas over the impartial administration of justice.
Trump’s proposed action raises significant concerns about the potential for political interference in the DOJ.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood