The US Treasury’s inspector general has initiated an audit into Dogecoin’s (DOGE) access to the federal payment system, as reported by the Associated Press. This audit, focusing on the past two years of transactions, raises significant questions about the scope and methodology involved. The timing of the audit, especially considering recent events and the seemingly limited timeframe of the actual issue, has sparked considerable debate.
The apparent incongruity between auditing security controls and reviewing two years’ worth of transactions suggests a potential mismatch in the audit’s objectives. Auditing security controls would typically focus on vulnerabilities and preventative measures, while reviewing transactions would investigate potential financial irregularities or unauthorized access.… Continue reading
Democratic senator: ‘DOGE is now at the IRS’
This statement, if true, is deeply concerning. The implication is that Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency associated with Elon Musk, has somehow gained access to or influence over the Internal Revenue Service’s systems. This raises immediate questions about data security, the potential for fraud, and the very integrity of the tax system. The prospect of a cryptocurrency, traditionally associated with decentralized and unregulated operations, having access to highly sensitive taxpayer information is alarming.
The potential for misuse is immense. Taxpayer data, including social security numbers, addresses, income details, and filing history, is among the most sensitive personal information one can possess.… Continue reading
Representative Stansbury publicly demanded that Elon Musk testify regarding his access and data extraction from numerous federal agencies. This follows Musk’s team’s unprecedented access to sensitive data from agencies including the CDC, Medicare/Medicaid, and the FAA—the latter coinciding with a surge in fatal aviation accidents. The extracted data encompasses the personal information of hundreds of millions of Americans. Democrats expressed outrage at the scope of Musk’s actions and the potential implications for national security and privacy.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of use. This allows for a direct line of communication between the public and the news organization. Contributions can help The Daily Beast deliver timely and relevant reporting.
Read More
In response to Elon Musk’s actions dismantling federal services through the DOGE program, Representatives Stansbury and Raskin introduced the “Nobody Elected Elon Musk Act.” This bill seeks to hold Musk personally liable for damages resulting from DOGE’s activities, which have faced legal challenges and widespread condemnation. The act aims to prevent taxpayers from bearing the financial burden of Musk’s actions, shifting responsibility to him and his associates. This legislation joins other Democratic efforts to curtail Musk’s influence, including proposals to eliminate his federal contracts and protect taxpayer data.
Read More
Tensions escalate between Elon Musk and Rep. Ro Khanna, who accuses Musk of constitutional violations stemming from alleged DOGE-related budget cuts to federal agencies. Khanna, representing Silicon Valley, remains undeterred by Musk’s online attacks, prioritizing constituent interests and demanding accountability. This conflict highlights growing Democratic concern over Musk’s actions, particularly regarding his proposed agency restructuring. The situation underscores a broader debate surrounding Musk’s influence and the effectiveness of political responses to his disruptive strategies.
Read More
Democrats are demanding answers from Senator Rubio regarding a highly unusual visit to the USAID headquarters by individuals claiming to represent Dogecoin. This visit has raised serious concerns about national security and the potential compromise of sensitive information. The Democrats report receiving information that these individuals, who apparently lacked proper security clearances, accessed classified areas within the facility.
This alleged unauthorized access to classified spaces is incredibly concerning. The potential exposure of sensitive files, including personally identifiable information of Americans working with USAID, represents a significant breach of security protocols and raises serious questions about the adequacy of safeguards in place to protect national security information.… Continue reading
A recent AP-NORC poll reveals a stark reality: a majority of Americans hold unfavorable views of both Elon Musk and the cryptocurrency Dogecoin, particularly in the context of its association with the current presidential administration. This widespread negativity highlights a significant disconnect between public sentiment and the influence wielded by these figures.
The poll indicates that a mere 36% of Americans view Musk favorably, while a substantial 52% express an unfavorable opinion. This disparity underscores a deep-seated unease surrounding Musk’s actions and public persona, suggesting a potential erosion of his once-strong public image. It raises questions about the long-term consequences of such widespread negative sentiment towards such a prominent and influential individual.… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s purported new government department, often referred to as “Doge,” is reportedly facing significant turmoil with the potential departure of Vivek Ramaswamy. This development throws into question the future of a department designed for government efficiency, raising doubts about its viability even before its official launch.
The possibility of Ramaswamy’s departure stems from his ambition to run for the governorship of Ohio. His focus shift towards this gubernatorial bid, possibly announced by the end of January, is predicted to significantly impact his involvement in “Doge,” potentially rendering his contribution minimal, if at all.
This potential departure might actually benefit Musk.… Continue reading
Michelle Obama’s absence from Jimmy Carter’s funeral sparked considerable online speculation. No official reason was given for her non-attendance, though several potential explanations exist, including prior commitments or personal reasons. The former First Lady’s close relationship with the Carters is well-documented, making her absence all the more notable. Her absence, however, did not detract from the widespread outpouring of respect for President Carter.
Read More