Fourteen states – New Mexico, Arizona, Michigan, Maryland, Minnesota, California, Nevada, Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii – have filed a lawsuit against DOGE, alleging that Elon Musk’s influence represents an unconstitutional concentration of power. This legal action is viewed by many as a crucial first step in addressing what some perceive as a dangerously unchecked level of influence wielded by a single individual.
The lawsuit highlights concerns over the erosion of democratic processes. The sheer audacity of the situation, with a single person potentially holding sway over critical aspects of the nation’s infrastructure and information flow, feels deeply unsettling to many.… Continue reading
Fourteen states filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk and President Trump, alleging the White House unconstitutionally granted Musk extensive power through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The suit argues that Trump violated the Appointments Clause by creating DOGE and giving Musk unchecked authority without congressional approval or Senate confirmation. The states seek to prevent Musk from making changes to government funding, contracts, and personnel decisions. The White House has dismissed the lawsuit as politically motivated, while multiple other legal challenges against DOGE are already underway.
Read More
Thirteen Democratic attorneys general announced their intent to sue Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to prevent its access to sensitive federal payment data. The lawsuit aims to protect citizen privacy and ensure continued funding for crucial programs, arguing that DOGE’s actions are unconstitutional and unlawful. A federal judge has temporarily limited DOGE’s access, granting only “read-only” permissions to two Musk allies. DOGE’s actions, including attempts to block payments to the U.S. Agency for International Development, have raised significant concerns about data security and potential disruptions to essential services.
Read More
Elon Musk’s DOGE, a purported “Department of Government Efficiency,” is facing a lawsuit mere minutes after President Trump’s inauguration. The lawsuit, a 30-page complaint filed by a public interest law firm, alleges that DOGE violates a 1972 law mandating transparency and adherence to specific rules for executive branch advisory committees. This legal challenge promises to be a significant battle over the incoming administration’s agenda, focusing on DOGE’s operational transparency and compliance with existing federal regulations.
The core of the legal argument centers on the alleged breach of a 1972 law governing advisory committees. This legislation outlines specific requirements for disclosure, hiring practices, and other operational aspects.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker