On Easter Sunday, President Trump pledged to make the U.S. “more religious,” a statement that resonates with his conservative Christian base but raises questions about the separation of church and state, a cornerstone of the First Amendment. This promise plays on his “Make America Great Again” slogan and reflects his strong support among white evangelical Protestants, Catholics, and non-evangelical Protestants. Conversely, Vice President Harris enjoys significant support among other religious groups and those identifying as agnostic or atheist. The ongoing debate surrounding the interpretation of the First Amendment and the appropriate balance between religious expression and government neutrality continues to shape American political discourse.
Read More
The Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari in the case challenging New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act (CCIA) leaves in place lower court injunctions blocking the law’s restrictions on carrying firearms in houses of worship. This is a victory for plaintiffs like Rev. Dr. Jimmie Hardaway Jr., who argued the ban infringed on Second Amendment rights and jeopardized congregational safety. While the broader challenge to the CCIA continues, the ruling allows armed congregants to continue carrying firearms in churches. Governor Hochul supports the state’s gun laws, while Second Amendment advocates vow to continue their legal fight.
Read More
The Texas Senate passed SB 10, mandating Ten Commandments displays in all public schools, by a 20-11 party-line vote. Supporters argued the Commandments are foundational to American law and ethics, while opponents cited potential First Amendment violations, specifically the Establishment Clause. The bill now proceeds to the House; if enacted, legal challenges are anticipated given a similar law’s temporary blockage in Louisiana. Debate included discussion of religious freedom and the Supreme Court’s evolving stance on such displays.
Read More
Governor Brad Little’s recent signing of a bill allowing Idaho doctors to refuse care based on their beliefs has sparked considerable controversy. This legislation raises serious questions about patient access to healthcare and the very foundation of the medical profession. The potential for discrimination against various groups based on a doctor’s personal convictions is a significant concern.
The implications extend beyond the immediate impact on patients. The question of whether employers can inquire about a doctor’s beliefs during the hiring process is now relevant, potentially leading to situations where individuals are denied employment opportunities based on their religious views, a situation that could exacerbate existing biases and inequalities within the healthcare system.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood