The Episcopal Church’s refusal to participate in a federal program resettling white South African refugees has ignited a firestorm of criticism from the American right. Prominent conservatives accused the church of racism and demanded funding cuts, citing the church’s receipt of over $50 million in federal grants for refugee resettlement. The Episcopal Church justified its decision based on its commitment to racial justice and its historical ties to South Africa, while the Trump administration maintains that these refugees are victims of genocide. The church will end its federal refugee resettlement program by September but will continue aiding refugees through other means.
Read More
A group of Quakers is undertaking a 300-mile march from New York City to Washington, D.C., to protest the Trump administration’s harsh immigration policies. This action reflects a long history of Quaker activism for social justice, including past efforts against slavery and war. The march aims to demonstrate solidarity with marginalized groups targeted by the current administration and deliver a 17th-century document advocating religious freedom, highlighting its continued relevance. Participants emphasize the incompatibility of the administration’s actions with constitutional principles and the spirit of American pluralism.
Read More
Stop using religion to justify depriving youth of their rights to a full education. The notion that LGBTQ+ topics pose a threat to children or communities is fundamentally flawed. A comprehensive education, including accurate information about LGBTQ+ history and sex education, is not only beneficial but life-saving.
Parents citing religious beliefs to oppose inclusive education often overlook the critical role of education in fostering understanding and acceptance. Denying students exposure to diverse perspectives limits their ability to navigate a complex world and develop empathy. This limited perspective can have devastating consequences, especially for LGBTQ+ youth who may already feel isolated and misunderstood.… Continue reading
The suggestion to disregard the separation of church and state is a significant departure from the established principles of American governance. It represents a potential shift toward a system where religious influence holds greater sway in public life, raising concerns about the implications for religious freedom and the balance of power.
This proposal challenges the very foundation upon which the United States was built, a nation founded on the principle of separating religious authority from the state. The intent to “bring religion back to our country” suggests a desire to integrate faith more deeply into governmental processes and public institutions. This could lead to policies reflecting specific religious beliefs, potentially marginalizing those of different faiths or no faith at all.… Continue reading
Reverend William Barber, a prominent progressive activist, was arrested at the US Capitol for praying with others in protest of federal budget cuts impacting vulnerable populations. This arrest, following the establishment of a Justice Department task force addressing anti-Christian bias, highlights the increasing tension surrounding political activism and religious expression. The Capitol Police cited “crowding, obstructing, and incommoding” as the reason for the arrests, while Barber framed the incident as a suppression of prayer and dissent. Barber’s activism spans over a decade, focusing on issues such as voting rights, minimum wage, and healthcare access.
Read More
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), under Secretary Doug Collins, has established a taskforce to investigate alleged anti-Christian bias within the department, soliciting reports from employees via a dedicated email address. This initiative, stemming from a broader Trump administration effort to address perceived anti-Christian sentiment in government, seeks reports on various issues, including informal policies, vaccine mandate exemptions, and responses to requests for religious exemptions from certain procedures. The email requests detailed information, including names, dates, and locations, for each reported incident. Critics have denounced this initiative as a partisan attempt to favor evangelical Christianity.
Read More
On Easter Sunday, President Trump pledged to make the U.S. “more religious,” a statement that resonates with his conservative Christian base but raises questions about the separation of church and state, a cornerstone of the First Amendment. This promise plays on his “Make America Great Again” slogan and reflects his strong support among white evangelical Protestants, Catholics, and non-evangelical Protestants. Conversely, Vice President Harris enjoys significant support among other religious groups and those identifying as agnostic or atheist. The ongoing debate surrounding the interpretation of the First Amendment and the appropriate balance between religious expression and government neutrality continues to shape American political discourse.
Read More
The Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari in the case challenging New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act (CCIA) leaves in place lower court injunctions blocking the law’s restrictions on carrying firearms in houses of worship. This is a victory for plaintiffs like Rev. Dr. Jimmie Hardaway Jr., who argued the ban infringed on Second Amendment rights and jeopardized congregational safety. While the broader challenge to the CCIA continues, the ruling allows armed congregants to continue carrying firearms in churches. Governor Hochul supports the state’s gun laws, while Second Amendment advocates vow to continue their legal fight.
Read More
The Texas Senate passed SB 10, mandating Ten Commandments displays in all public schools, by a 20-11 party-line vote. Supporters argued the Commandments are foundational to American law and ethics, while opponents cited potential First Amendment violations, specifically the Establishment Clause. The bill now proceeds to the House; if enacted, legal challenges are anticipated given a similar law’s temporary blockage in Louisiana. Debate included discussion of religious freedom and the Supreme Court’s evolving stance on such displays.
Read More
Governor Brad Little’s recent signing of a bill allowing Idaho doctors to refuse care based on their beliefs has sparked considerable controversy. This legislation raises serious questions about patient access to healthcare and the very foundation of the medical profession. The potential for discrimination against various groups based on a doctor’s personal convictions is a significant concern.
The implications extend beyond the immediate impact on patients. The question of whether employers can inquire about a doctor’s beliefs during the hiring process is now relevant, potentially leading to situations where individuals are denied employment opportunities based on their religious views, a situation that could exacerbate existing biases and inequalities within the healthcare system.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood