Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination to Director of National Intelligence has sparked controversy, with reports surfacing of her struggling to articulate the DNI’s responsibilities and demonstrating confusion regarding key national security issues during Senate interviews. While some Republican senators expressed concerns about her qualifications, others, like Senator Eric Schmitt, voiced their support. Gabbard’s loyalty to Trump, a key factor in her selection, appears to be outweighing concerns among some GOP members. However, the lack of overt opposition to her confirmation doesn’t eliminate the considerable doubts surrounding her suitability for the position.
Read More
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as director of national intelligence has faced significant backlash due to her past associations with Russia and Syria, including a 2017 visit with Bashar al-Assad. Critics, such as John Bolton, point to her support of Russian propaganda and question her judgment, characterizing her foreign policy views as flawed. While Gabbard met with key Republican senators to garner support for Senate confirmation, her nomination remains controversial, particularly given Russian state media’s endorsement. The confirmation process will determine whether she will oversee the nation’s intelligence agencies and a budget exceeding $70 billion.
Read More
On Deadline White House, former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi expressed serious concerns regarding Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence. Their discussion with Nicolle Wallace centered on the implications for U.S. national security and international alliances. The analysts highlighted alarming new questions surrounding Gabbard’s suitability for the critical role. This discussion took place on November 19, 2024.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker