Warner’s assertion that Tulsi Gabbard may be so unqualified she can’t legally serve as spy chief highlights a significant concern regarding her nomination. The law establishing the Director of National Intelligence position explicitly requires extensive national security expertise. Gabbard’s background, while including military service, notably lacks formal experience within the U.S. intelligence community. This raises serious questions about her preparedness to oversee numerous spy agencies and manage a budget exceeding $100 billion.
This lack of direct experience contrasts sharply with the immense responsibilities of the DNI role. The position demands a deep understanding of intelligence gathering, analysis, and dissemination, as well as intricate knowledge of international relations and national security threats.… Continue reading
President Trump’s nominee to lead the National Intelligence position faced significant scrutiny during Senate confirmation hearings. The nominee demonstrably struggled to articulate the responsibilities and scope of the director of national intelligence role. This lack of understanding raised serious concerns among senators regarding their qualifications for the critical position. Ultimately, the nominee’s inability to define the job itself highlighted a concerning lack of preparedness for such a demanding and consequential role.
Read More
John Bolton, Trump’s former national security advisor, expressed concern over Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence, citing her past meetings with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Bolton suggested the Syrian regime may possess compromising files on several Americans, including Gabbard, highlighting her controversial stance on Syria as a non-threat to the U.S. This follows reports of a major rebel offensive in Syria, potentially leading to the discovery of these files. Bolton’s comments raise significant concerns about Gabbard’s qualifications and potential conflicts of interest.
Read More
A letter signed by nearly 100 former U.S. officials strongly opposes President-elect Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence, citing concerns about her judgment and fitness for the role. The letter highlights Gabbard’s meetings with dictators such as Assad and Putin, including a 2017 trip to Syria and support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. These actions, the officials argue, raise serious questions about her suitability for the position. The letter urges Senate leaders to conduct closed-door briefings before confirming her nomination.
Read More
In 2018, bipartisan concerns arose regarding Rep. Tulsi Gabbard’s potential compromise of a Syrian defector’s identity during a closed-door briefing. Staffers took precautions to prevent Gabbard from revealing the defector’s information, highlighting deep misgivings about her pro-Assad stance. Gabbard’s subsequent nomination as Director of National Intelligence has drawn criticism from former officials citing her past actions and echoing of Russian and Assad regime propaganda. These concerns center on her potential to provide unbiased intelligence briefings and the potential impact on vital intelligence alliances. The controversy underscores significant apprehension surrounding her access to top-secret information.
Read More
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence is facing significant opposition due to her past pro-Russia statements and alleged consumption of Kremlin propaganda. Concerns, voiced by former aides and high-ranking intelligence officials, center on her perceived sympathy towards Russia and Syria, potentially compromising her ability to lead the intelligence community. Republican senators, while prioritizing other controversial nominees, privately express doubts about her fitness for office, suggesting a difficult confirmation process ahead. Gabbard’s nomination is considered the most challenging of several controversial Trump cabinet picks.
Read More
Donald Trump’s recent appointments, including Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense, and Matt Gaetz for Attorney General, represent a significant shift towards controversial figures. Gabbard, a former congresswoman with a history of promoting conspiracy theories and aligning with Russian propaganda, is particularly concerning given her new role overseeing intelligence agencies. Her past actions, including downplaying Assad’s chemical weapons attacks and spreading misinformation about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, raise serious questions about her suitability for the position. This unconventional approach to staffing key national security positions reflects a clear preference by Trump for candidates who challenge established norms.
Read More
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence is highly controversial due to her history of promoting Russian propaganda and supporting authoritarian regimes. Her past actions, including questioning the source of Syrian airstrikes that injured children and defending Assad’s regime, demonstrate a troubling lack of objectivity and empathy. Experts express concerns about her susceptibility to disinformation and her potential to undermine US intelligence credibility with allies. These concerns, coupled with questions about her meeting the required “extensive national security expertise” for the DNI position, raise serious doubts about her suitability for the role.
Read More
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence is highly controversial due to her history of promoting Russian propaganda and supporting authoritarian regimes. Her past actions, including questioning whether ISIS, not Assad or Russia, bombed Syrian children and subsequently meeting with Assad, demonstrate a pattern of disregarding facts and echoing Kremlin talking points. This has raised concerns amongst both Democrats and Republicans, with experts citing her views as alarming and potentially jeopardizing US intelligence operations and relationships with allies. Gabbard’s apparent susceptibility to misinformation and her lack of the required “extensive national security expertise” further fuel opposition to her confirmation.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence is facing significant opposition due to resurfaced reports of her ties to the Science of Identity Foundation (SIF), a controversial religious group described as a cult. Gabbard’s connections to SIF, including her husband’s involvement and her own past praise of its leader as a guru, have raised concerns about her suitability for the role. This, coupled with previous accusations of ties to a Russian spy, has led to strong condemnation from figures such as John Bolton, who deemed her the “worst cabinet-level appointment in history.” The Senate confirmation process is now expected to be highly contentious.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker