The UK government plans to implement a mandatory digital ID, dubbed the “Brit card,” for all adults to tackle illegal immigration. This digital ID, accessible via a smartphone app, would be required for employment and renting properties, verifying an individual’s right to live and work in the UK. The initiative aims to reduce the appeal of illegal work, addressing concerns over the ease of faking existing identification documents and following calls from figures such as French President Emmanuel Macron. Despite opposition from various parties and civil liberty groups, the government is moving forward with this plan, which would necessitate legislation and a consultation period before being rolled out.
Read More
China is set to introduce a centralized digital ID system that will further solidify its control over its 1 billion internet users. This system, requiring users to submit personal information including facial scans to access online accounts, will allow the government to monitor real identities across various platforms while giving companies less access to user data. Though presented as a measure to protect data privacy, experts fear it will facilitate digital exile and personalized censorship. Critics also worry about increased government surveillance and potential data breaches, despite the system’s stated purpose.
Read More
To combat the misuse of AI-generated deepfakes, the Danish government plans to grant citizens property rights over their likeness and voice. This proposed legislation would allow individuals to request the removal of deepfakes featuring their image or voice from hosting platforms. The bill, which has cross-party support and is expected to pass this fall, aims to protect artists, public figures, and ordinary people from digital identity theft, addressing concerns highlighted by instances like AI-generated music mimicking popular artists. Further legislation is planned to potentially fine companies that fail to comply with takedown requests, reflecting Denmark’s commitment to both freedom of speech and individual rights in the age of generative AI.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker