Democratic members of Congress, exercising their legal oversight authority, visited a Newark ICE facility, resulting in a physical confrontation with DHS officers. The incident escalated when Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested after attempting to join the lawmakers. DHS officials accused the congresspeople of illegally entering the facility and assaulting officers, threatening further arrests based on body camera footage. Conversely, the congresspeople denied wrongdoing, citing the appropriations act granting them access. The mayor, not covered by this act, was also detained.
Read More
Following a confrontation at a New Jersey ICE facility, a DHS official confirmed that arresting Democratic members of Congress is under consideration. This announcement comes after Newark Mayor Baraka’s arrest, the circumstances of which are disputed. DHS claims body camera footage shows lawmakers assaulting ICE officers, while the lawmakers deny wrongdoing and allege assault by ICE agents. The arrests would represent a significant escalation in tensions between the administration and Congress, raising concerns about separation of powers. Legal challenges are expected to follow.
Read More
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), under the Trump administration, is reportedly considering arresting several House Democrats following an incident at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in New Jersey. The alleged offense centers around a visit by the lawmakers to the facility, with accusations flying on both sides regarding who initiated any physical altercations.
This potential move by the DHS is being viewed by many as a blatant attempt at intimidation. Regardless of whether any legal grounds exist for arrest, the very suggestion serves to silence dissent and discourage future oversight visits to such facilities. The idea that representatives of a co-equal branch of government would face such drastic measures simply for carrying out their oversight duties is deeply concerning.… Continue reading
A federal appeals court rejected the Trump administration’s attempt to revoke the temporary legal status of approximately 400,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. This decision upholds a lower court ruling that blocked the Department of Homeland Security’s termination of a Biden-era parole program. The lower court found that DHS had improperly revoked the migrants’ status without individual reviews, based on a misinterpretation of the law. The Trump administration may appeal to the Supreme Court.
Read More
The Trump administration launched a voluntary self-deportation program offering undocumented immigrants a $1,000 stipend and travel assistance in exchange for their return to their home countries. This initiative, utilizing the CBP “Home” app for tracking, aims to reduce the average $17,121 cost of arrest and deportation per individual. Participants are de-prioritized for detention and removal while actively pursuing departure, potentially preserving future legal immigration options. One individual has already successfully completed the program’s requirements.
Read More
Nineteen-year-old Jose Hermosillo, a U.S. citizen with intellectual disabilities, was mistakenly arrested by Customs and Border Protection in Arizona and detained for ten days. Despite providing proof of his citizenship, Hermosillo was initially charged with illegal entry after reportedly claiming to be a Mexican citizen and signing a sworn statement, actions his family attributes to his cognitive impairments. Following national attention and intervention from the Arizona Attorney General, the charges were dropped, and Hermosillo was released. The incident highlights concerns about the handling of individuals with intellectual disabilities within the immigration system.
Read More
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jeopardized the safety of Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s family by publicly posting his wife’s address on X, forcing them into a safe house. This action followed the administration’s controversial deportation of Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, despite prior court orders blocking his removal. The DHS justified the deportation using unsubstantiated allegations of criminality, claims disputed by his wife, who described the incident leading to a protective order as isolated and attributed to stress. Democratic officials and advocates criticize the process as a denial of due process.
Read More
Following his deportation to El Salvador, Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, is contesting the U.S. government’s actions, calling his removal an unjust “abduction.” While she admits to briefly seeking a protective order in 2021 after a marital dispute, she clarifies that the issue was resolved privately and their relationship strengthened. The Department of Homeland Security released these documents, along with claims of gang affiliation, to counter positive media portrayals of Garcia. This deportation, deemed an “administrative error” by DHS, has become a political flashpoint amid President Trump’s deportation policies and a Supreme Court ruling mandating Garcia’s return, which the White House continues to resist.
Read More
The arrest of Mohsen Mahdawi, a Columbia University associate of Mahmoud Khalil, by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents has sparked outrage and fear. Mahdawi’s arrest, occurring during his citizenship hearing, felt less like a legal process and more like a kidnapping to many observers. The swift action, lacking even the appearance of a clear criminal suspicion, has left many questioning the motivations and legality of the DHS’s actions.
The concerns extend beyond Mahdawi’s individual case. His situation highlights a pattern of questionable detentions followed by hastily filed habeas petitions, a worrying trend suggesting a deliberate strategy to circumvent legal protections.… Continue reading
The Department of Homeland Security proposes expanding social media data collection for immigration applicants, encompassing those already in the U.S. seeking benefits like green cards or citizenship. This expands upon existing practices, initiated during the Obama administration and intensified under Trump, aiming to enhance fraud detection and national security vetting. The proposal, open for public comment until May 5th, has raised concerns from advocates regarding free speech implications and the potential for biased interpretations of social media content. An estimated 3.6 million individuals could be affected by this policy change.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood