Responding to a video featuring six Democratic lawmakers urging service members to “refuse illegal orders” from former President Trump, Rep. Adam Smith stated he believes Trump has issued illegal military orders. Smith cited a specific instance, the order to blow up boats in the Caribbean without proper justification, as an example. He condemned the Department of War’s review into Sen. Mark Kelly’s participation in the video, deeming it a threat to free speech. While Smith expressed his views, Sen. Elissa Slotkin, also in the video, stated she was not aware of any illegal military orders from the former president.
Read More
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has mandated that all U.S. armed forces personnel watch or read his September 30 address, a directive confirmed by the Pentagon, blurring the lines between military leadership and political indoctrination. The speech, delivered at Marine Corps Base Quantico, outlined policy changes that reinstate pre-2015 combat standards, mandate increased physical testing, and eliminate accommodations for gender expression and grooming. Hegseth’s address, which rebranded the Department of Defense as the “Department of War,” targeted diversity and inclusion efforts, declaring a return to traditional military values. The order is viewed by some service members as a loyalty test and a form of propaganda.
Read More
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed senior military leadership, emphasizing a renewed focus on “warfighting” as the primary mission of the newly renamed Department of War. He stressed the importance of physical fitness and appearance, mandating stricter weight and fitness requirements for all service members, especially those in combat roles. Additionally, Hegseth criticized “woke” policies within the department, vowing to eliminate initiatives he deemed as distractions. President Donald Trump also signaled his intention to swiftly remove senior military leaders who do not meet his standards.
Read More
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is planning an in-person meeting with top military officials in Virginia next week, with the intention of recording and publicly releasing his speech. The speech is expected to address military standards, the “warrior ethos,” and the Trump administration’s vision for the Defense Department, which is being rebranded as the “Department of War”. This gathering, described by sources as a “pep rally,” will be a demonstration of force with optics as a priority. The event has raised questions among retired military officials due to its scale and the potential costs associated with bringing numerous generals to one location, especially given that the meeting could have been conducted virtually.
Read More
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth will address hundreds of generals and admirals in Virginia to unveil the administration’s transformation of the Department of Defense, rebranding it as the “Department of War.” The meeting, resembling a “pep rally,” aims to emphasize the “warrior ethos” and outline new standards for military personnel, including readiness, fitness, and grooming. Hegseth intends to record and publicly release his speech, with the White House amplifying its message, while also making it clear that attendance is mandatory for the summoned officers. The surprise gathering, initiated by Hegseth, has not been fully detailed to those attending, but it has been made clear that there will be ramifications for those who do not attend.
Read More
The Department of War, under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, has implemented stringent new press guidelines, significantly limiting reporters’ access and ability to publish information from the Pentagon. These rules require express approval for publication, mandate escorts for most building access, and compel journalists to sign compliance forms. The Pentagon Press Association and many journalists view these changes as a direct threat to press freedom and a form of retribution against critical publications. Hegseth’s actions follow a period of controversy and concern over leaks and potential security breaches within the department.
Read More
In a recent interview, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth stated the Department of Defense’s new secondary title, “Department of War,” is meant to signal a desire for peace. President Trump signed an executive order to add the title, but Congressional approval is required for the formal renaming. Critics, including Senator Rand Paul, have already condemned the department’s actions, specifically the recent destruction of a Venezuelan boat, raising concerns about the department’s motivations. The new title and Hegseth’s explanation have drawn comparisons to George Orwell’s novel *1984* and other works.
Read More
In a move that could cost taxpayers over $1 billion, President Trump signed an executive order to rename the Department of Defense the Department of War. The name change is intended to signal America’s strong military, according to Trump. Despite vowing to cut wasteful spending, the government will need to update hundreds of Pentagon agencies, bases, and signage, likely leading to significant costs. Republicans have already introduced legislation in both the House and Senate to codify the change, as Trump mentioned the change several times over the last month.
Read More
Following a U.S. drone strike that killed 11 alleged Venezuelan drug traffickers, Vice President JD Vance dismissed criticism of the action, responding defiantly to accusations of war crimes. The strike, which President Trump authorized, targeted a vessel in international waters and was celebrated by the administration as a blow to the drug trade. Vance defended the use of military force, stating that killing cartel members protects U.S. citizens, while the Department of Defense, now nicknamed the “Department of War,” has also defended the strike, claiming it was done in defense of the American people. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has since bragged about the strike.
Read More
Pentagon officials fume over Trump’s Department of War rebrand: The reaction from within the Pentagon to the suggestion of renaming the Department of Defense to the Department of War has been, unsurprisingly, one of widespread frustration, anger, and confusion. Many in the military establishment view this proposed change as a costly, unnecessary, and even counterproductive move. The potential price tag, running into billions of dollars, is seen as particularly galling, especially when the military is facing genuinely pressing challenges like the rise of aggressive authoritarian alliances.
This sentiment stems, in part, from a belief that the rebrand is purely for political theater, designed to appeal to a specific segment of the electorate.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood