President-elect Trump’s appointments of Todd Blanche as Deputy Attorney General, John Sauer as Solicitor General, and Emil Bove as Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General raise serious concerns. These individuals, all with strong legal credentials and prior experience representing Trump personally, will hold significant power within the Department of Justice. This placement suggests a prioritization of Trump’s personal interests over the impartial administration of justice, potentially jeopardizing the integrity of federal prosecutions and legal strategy. While their qualifications are undeniable, their loyalty to Trump raises significant questions about their ability to serve the interests of the United States objectively.
Read More
In response to a Bloomberg report, Google vehemently opposes a Department of Justice proposal to force the sale of Chrome browser, arguing it would negatively impact consumers and businesses. This proposed remedy, to be presented to Judge Amit Mehta, follows his August ruling that Google holds an online search monopoly. Further, Google objects to additional proposed measures concerning its AI practices, Android OS, and data usage. The company contends these actions would undermine American technological competitiveness.
Read More
Donald Trump’s appointment of Matt Gaetz as Attorney General and Todd Blanche as Deputy Attorney General raises serious concerns about the weaponization of the Department of Justice for political retribution. Gaetz’s ethically questionable past and Trump’s stated intention to target political opponents, including Special Counsel Jack Smith, threaten the department’s independence and the rule of law. This, coupled with a recent Supreme Court ruling granting presidents broad immunity, significantly weakens checks on executive power. Experts warn of potential widespread pardons for January 6th insurrectionists and the undermining of ongoing investigations, further jeopardizing the integrity of the justice system. The actions are viewed as a blatant disregard for historical norms and departmental standards.
Read More
Matt Gaetz, a former Republican Congressman, has been nominated by former President Trump to lead the Department of Justice. This nomination comes despite allegations that Gaetz attended a party in 2017 where a 17-year-old girl was allegedly sexually trafficked by Gaetz’s friend, Joel Greenberg. Greenberg has admitted to having sex with the victim and has stated that Gaetz paid him to bring women to parties, some of whom were underage. These allegations have been corroborated by court documents and testimony from Gaetz’s ex-girlfriend. Despite these serious allegations, Gaetz has been a staunch Trump supporter, and Senator Markwayne Mullin, who previously expressed concern about Gaetz’s behavior, now fully trusts Trump’s decision to nominate him.
Read More
Donald Trump’s nomination of Congressman Matt Gaetz for Attorney General is a blatant attempt to weaponize the Department of Justice, prioritizing vengeance over justice. This choice, shocking in its disregard for legal and ethical standards, reflects a desire to punish those who investigated Trump and Gaetz, effectively turning the DOJ into a tool for settling personal scores. Gaetz, himself under investigation for serious misconduct, lacks the qualifications and temperament for this position. This nomination, if confirmed, would fundamentally alter the DOJ, eroding its integrity and independence by purging career staff and replacing them with loyalists. This would have devastating consequences for the nation’s legal system, potentially leading to politically motivated prosecutions and a further erosion of trust in the government.
Read More
President-elect Trump has nominated Rep. Matt Gaetz, a staunch Trump loyalist and vocal critic of the Department of Justice, to serve as Attorney General. Gaetz’s selection, which came as a surprise to many, highlights Trump’s prioritization of loyalty over experience. Gaetz, who has been the subject of a House Ethics Committee investigation into allegations of misconduct, will resign from Congress before assuming the role. The nomination has sparked controversy, with some questioning Gaetz’s suitability for the position due to the ongoing ethics probe and his previous criticisms of the Department of Justice. Gaetz’s confirmation by the Senate remains uncertain, with many senators expressing concerns about his qualifications and the potential conflicts of interest his appointment would create.
Read More
The prospect of Donald Trump returning to the White House sends chills down the spines of many government officials, but within the Department of Justice, the fear is palpable. The sense of dread stems from the belief that Trump will install loyalists in key positions, effectively dismantling the existing system and replacing career civil servants with individuals whose sole qualifications are unwavering loyalty to Trump and a disdain for the status quo. This potential shift evokes images of authoritarian regimes like Hungary and Russia, where the erosion of democratic institutions has paved the way for unchecked power.
The fear is not unfounded.… Continue reading
As I read about the latest news regarding former President Trump’s plan to sue the Department of Justice for $100 million over the Mar-a-Lago raid after the classified documents case was dismissed, I cannot help but feel a sense of frustration and disbelief. The fact that he is willing to pursue such a lawsuit, especially considering the circumstances surrounding the case, reflects a level of audacity that is truly astounding.
The case itself was dismissed due to the biased judgment of Judge Cannon, who claimed that Attorney Jack Smith was “illegally appointed by the Justice Department.” However, this dismissal does not absolve Trump of any wrongdoing or justify his decision to pursue legal action against the DOJ.… Continue reading
When special counsel Robert Hur admitted to telling Biden that he seemed to have a “photographic understanding and recall,” it shed light on the biased nature of his investigation. Despite acknowledging Biden’s impressive memory during their interviews, Hur chose to overlook this compliment in his final report. This deliberate omission raises questions about the integrity and objectivity of his findings.
Hur’s decision to focus on Biden’s memory in his report, without including his own observation of Biden’s photographic recall, speaks volumes about his intentions. By fixating on doubts about the president’s memory, Hur attempted to create a narrative that painted Biden in a negative light.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood