President Trump plans to sign an executive order dissolving the Department of Education, fulfilling a campaign promise and a long-held conservative goal. While the order directs the Secretary to facilitate closure and return authority to states, Congress’s creation of the department in 1979 makes complete dismantling unlikely without further legislative action. The department’s significant role in managing billions of dollars in school funding and student loans raises concerns about the impact on students and institutions. Opposition exists, with advocates arguing the move would harm vulnerable students and exacerbate educational inequality.
Read More
Twenty state attorneys general and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration for dismantling the Department of Education, citing the termination of over 1,300 employees. The lawsuit argues that the administration’s actions, effectively starving the agency of resources, constitute an illegal circumvention of Congress’s power to abolish executive agencies. The defendants include President Trump, Secretary McMahon, and the Department itself. The administration counters that returning education authority to the states was part of the president’s mandate, while simultaneously asserting that the dismantling is proceeding rapidly.
Read More
Trump’s announced intention to abolish the US Department of Education is a significant and controversial move, raising numerous questions about its legality and its potential impact. The very notion of a president unilaterally dismantling a government department established by Congress is inherently problematic, raising concerns about the separation of powers fundamental to the American system of government. The Department of Education, established through legislation, isn’t something subject to presidential whim; its existence and functions are defined by law passed by Congress, not executive order. This means Trump’s action would likely face immediate legal challenges, potentially resulting in a federal injunction halting the process.… Continue reading
Users are advised that Internet Explorer 11 is not supported. For the best browsing experience, accessing the site with a different browser is recommended. This is due to limitations in IE11’s compatibility with current web technologies. Optimal functionality and features may be unavailable or impaired while using IE11. Therefore, switching browsers is crucial for a seamless user experience.
Read More
Democratic members of Congress were denied access to the Department of Education, sparking outrage and raising serious questions about the separation of powers. This incident highlights a concerning trend of executive branch overreach and the apparent lack of effective response from the legislative branch. The situation unfolded when a group of Democratic lawmakers arrived at the Department of Education seeking a meeting with the acting secretary.
Their visit followed the sending of a letter signed by numerous members of Congress, demanding action against potential executive orders. Notably, the lawmakers were not given any explanation for the denial of entry, leaving them to depart after a period of waiting.… Continue reading
On February 7, 2025, a security officer at the Department of Education prevented Democratic members of Congress from entering a scheduled meeting with Acting Secretary Denise Carter. This denial of access prevented the meeting from taking place. The incident highlights escalating tensions between the congressional Democrats and the Department of Education. The reasons behind the security officer’s actions remain unclear.
Read More
The White House plans an executive order to eliminate the Department of Education, fulfilling a long-standing campaign promise by President Trump. While Congress’s approval is needed for such an action, the order reflects a broader Republican agenda to return education control to states. Opponents, such as the National Education Association, warn of negative consequences for students, particularly vulnerable populations. Despite Republican control of Congress, passing legislation to abolish the department faces significant hurdles, requiring bipartisan support.
Read More
A bill to terminate the Department of Education has been introduced in the House of Representatives, and the reaction online has been, to put it mildly, explosive. The sheer audacity of the proposal seems to have caught many completely off guard, sparking outrage and disbelief across various online platforms. The immediate concern is the potential impact on education standards across the nation, raising questions about the future of educational resources and opportunities for students.
This isn’t just about the immediate implications for students and educators; it’s about the broader societal consequences. Many commentators are expressing deep concerns about the long-term effects on the nation’s intellectual capacity and its ability to compete globally in an increasingly knowledge-based economy.… Continue reading
Representative David Rouzer’s newly introduced States’ Education Reclamation Act seeks to abolish the Department of Education, returning its $200 billion annual budget to states for local education initiatives. This action, echoing previous attempts by the Representative, reignites the long-standing debate over federal versus state control of education. While proponents argue for increased local autonomy and improved resource allocation, critics express concerns about potential funding disparities and negative consequences for under-resourced schools. The bill’s fate now lies with the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Read More
Vivek Ramaswamy criticized the low 2022 eighth-grade reading scores, advocating for the elimination of the Department of Education as a solution. However, education experts dispute this claim, asserting that the department’s role in funding, data collection, and research is crucial for monitoring student progress and improving literacy. They argue that eliminating the department would not address the underlying issues impacting reading proficiency. Instead, increased investment in research and grant programs within the department could prove more effective.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood