Trump’s announced intention to abolish the US Department of Education is a significant and controversial move, raising numerous questions about its legality and its potential impact. The very notion of a president unilaterally dismantling a government department established by Congress is inherently problematic, raising concerns about the separation of powers fundamental to the American system of government. The Department of Education, established through legislation, isn’t something subject to presidential whim; its existence and functions are defined by law passed by Congress, not executive order. This means Trump’s action would likely face immediate legal challenges, potentially resulting in a federal injunction halting the process.… Continue reading
Users are advised that Internet Explorer 11 is not supported. For the best browsing experience, accessing the site with a different browser is recommended. This is due to limitations in IE11’s compatibility with current web technologies. Optimal functionality and features may be unavailable or impaired while using IE11. Therefore, switching browsers is crucial for a seamless user experience.
Read More
Democratic members of Congress were denied access to the Department of Education, sparking outrage and raising serious questions about the separation of powers. This incident highlights a concerning trend of executive branch overreach and the apparent lack of effective response from the legislative branch. The situation unfolded when a group of Democratic lawmakers arrived at the Department of Education seeking a meeting with the acting secretary.
Their visit followed the sending of a letter signed by numerous members of Congress, demanding action against potential executive orders. Notably, the lawmakers were not given any explanation for the denial of entry, leaving them to depart after a period of waiting.… Continue reading
On February 7, 2025, a security officer at the Department of Education prevented Democratic members of Congress from entering a scheduled meeting with Acting Secretary Denise Carter. This denial of access prevented the meeting from taking place. The incident highlights escalating tensions between the congressional Democrats and the Department of Education. The reasons behind the security officer’s actions remain unclear.
Read More
The White House plans an executive order to eliminate the Department of Education, fulfilling a long-standing campaign promise by President Trump. While Congress’s approval is needed for such an action, the order reflects a broader Republican agenda to return education control to states. Opponents, such as the National Education Association, warn of negative consequences for students, particularly vulnerable populations. Despite Republican control of Congress, passing legislation to abolish the department faces significant hurdles, requiring bipartisan support.
Read More
A bill to terminate the Department of Education has been introduced in the House of Representatives, and the reaction online has been, to put it mildly, explosive. The sheer audacity of the proposal seems to have caught many completely off guard, sparking outrage and disbelief across various online platforms. The immediate concern is the potential impact on education standards across the nation, raising questions about the future of educational resources and opportunities for students.
This isn’t just about the immediate implications for students and educators; it’s about the broader societal consequences. Many commentators are expressing deep concerns about the long-term effects on the nation’s intellectual capacity and its ability to compete globally in an increasingly knowledge-based economy.… Continue reading
Representative David Rouzer’s newly introduced States’ Education Reclamation Act seeks to abolish the Department of Education, returning its $200 billion annual budget to states for local education initiatives. This action, echoing previous attempts by the Representative, reignites the long-standing debate over federal versus state control of education. While proponents argue for increased local autonomy and improved resource allocation, critics express concerns about potential funding disparities and negative consequences for under-resourced schools. The bill’s fate now lies with the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Read More
Vivek Ramaswamy criticized the low 2022 eighth-grade reading scores, advocating for the elimination of the Department of Education as a solution. However, education experts dispute this claim, asserting that the department’s role in funding, data collection, and research is crucial for monitoring student progress and improving literacy. They argue that eliminating the department would not address the underlying issues impacting reading proficiency. Instead, increased investment in research and grant programs within the department could prove more effective.
Read More
Senator Mike Rounds introduced the “Returning Education to Our States Act,” aiming to abolish the Department of Education and redistribute its $200 billion budget to other federal agencies and states. The bill faces an uphill battle, requiring a 60-vote supermajority in the Senate, though Rounds hopes to utilize a reconciliation process to pass it with a simple majority. Experts express concern over the potential negative impacts on students with disabilities and marginalized groups, highlighting the loss of crucial federal protections and funding. The bill’s passage would represent a long-held Republican goal, reversing decades of federal involvement in education.
Read More
Senator Mike Rounds’s “Returning Education to Our States Act” proposes eliminating the Department of Education, redistributing its $238 billion budget to other federal agencies. This action, supported by President-elect Trump, aims to return control of education to states and local communities, arguing the current department is overly bureaucratic and ineffective. While the bill faces an uphill battle in the Senate due to Democratic opposition, similar attempts to abolish the department have been made by Republicans since its inception in 1979. The bill’s passage is considered unlikely in the current congressional session.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker