Frank Rose, the former assistant secretary of state, warned that President Trump’s aggressive approach to Greenland could undermine the U.S.’s established access to the territory. Rose highlighted Greenland’s critical importance to U.S. defense, particularly for missile defense capabilities, emphasizing existing treaties granting the U.S. significant military latitude. Despite agreeing with the strategic significance of Greenland, Rose expressed concern that Trump’s forceful rhetoric, including threats of seizing the territory, could damage relations with Denmark and jeopardize future cooperation. Rose, who previously negotiated defense deals with Denmark, believes this is a situation where upsetting allies is unnecessary to achieve U.S. goals.
Read More
During a meeting with oil executives, President Donald Trump stated his administration would take action on Greenland regardless of Denmark’s approval, escalating his pursuit of the Danish territory. Trump’s comments followed the U.S. military’s invasion of Venezuela, driven by potential oil business opportunities. The President has long sought Greenland, citing its strategic importance, but faces resistance from Denmark and its NATO allies who oppose its sale. The administration is reportedly considering military options and purchase negotiations despite this opposition.
Read More
In response to President Trump’s consideration of acquiring Greenland, Danish and Greenlandic envoys have engaged in a robust campaign to dissuade U.S. lawmakers and administration officials. They have been holding meetings with key figures to voice their concerns. These efforts come after Trump expressed a desire for ownership of the strategic Arctic island, prompting pushback from some lawmakers and international leaders. The envoys have emphasized the importance of Greenland’s self-determination and the existing defense agreements.
Read More
Norwegian leaders have voiced strong support for Denmark in response to US President Trump’s threats to annex Greenland. These leaders, including the Foreign Minister and Prime Minister, have condemned Trump’s actions as a violation of international law and the NATO pact, while expressing solidarity with Denmark. They emphasized Greenland’s status as part of the Kingdom of Denmark and the importance of respecting international rules. Trump’s assertions regarding the need for US control, likely motivated by Greenland’s resources, have been met with resistance from both Danish and Norwegian officials.
Read More
The Danish army maintains a standing rule of engagement, established in 1952, that mandates soldiers to immediately counter-attack any invading forces, including those from the United States, without waiting for orders. This directive, confirmed by the Danish defence ministry, remains in effect. The rule’s reaffirmation comes amid President Donald Trump’s repeated expressions of interest in annexing Greenland, even suggesting the use of military force. These statements have caused significant shock and consternation in Denmark, Greenland, and the broader NATO alliance.
Read More
The White House has revealed it is discussing various options for acquiring Greenland, a semi-autonomous region of Denmark, citing national security concerns. These options include potentially utilizing the U.S. military. This has prompted strong reactions, including a joint statement of support for Denmark from several European allies who expressed their commitment to respecting Greenland’s territorial integrity. Furthermore, US officials have also discussed the possibility of purchasing the island or establishing a “Compact of Free Association.” These discussions have sparked debate over Greenland’s future and its relationship with the U.S. and Denmark.
Read More
The Shopping Trends team, separate from CTV News journalists, has found that specific products may generate commission through affiliate links. This means that if readers purchase items through the provided links, the team may receive compensation. The team aims to provide product recommendations, but readers should be aware of this potential financial relationship. Further details about the team’s operations can be found on the “About Us” page.
Read More
In response to renewed interest from the Trump administration in acquiring Greenland, European NATO leaders issued a joint statement asserting that Greenland’s future rests solely with its people and Denmark. The statement emphasized NATO’s commitment to Arctic security, with Denmark, including Greenland, as a key ally. This declaration, signed by leaders from eight European nations, directly countered Trump’s rhetoric and reaffirmed principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity, principles that included not using force. The White House has yet to respond, raising the potential for diplomatic strain amidst existing geopolitical tensions.
Read More
Sir Keir Starmer has stated that only Greenland and Denmark should determine Greenland’s future, directly responding to President Trump’s suggestions of the US annexing the territory. This stance contrasts with his response to the US military action in Venezuela, where he has been less definitive about its legality, despite criticisms from some Labour MPs and other parties. While acknowledging the removal of Venezuela’s president, Starmer has called for a peaceful transition to democracy and has expressed a commitment to international law. The UK is involved in the UN Security Council’s discussion on the US operation, with its representative calling for a legitimate government in Venezuela.
Read More
In the wake of a U.S. military operation in Venezuela, Greenland’s legislative elections are taking place under a cloud of uncertainty. President Trump expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, citing national security concerns and suggesting Denmark is incapable of defending it. This has sparked a crisis in Denmark, which is responsible for Greenland’s defense, and prompted Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen to publicly reject the idea of a U.S. takeover.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker