Musk’s DOGE: Facilitating Fraud, Not Fighting It
Despite an initial $1 trillion goal reduced to $185 billion, achieving even this revised target by the September 2025 deadline appears improbable due to inflated cost-cutting claims. Analysis suggests that purported savings are largely based on subjective definitions of “waste,” disproportionately targeting non-American aid and liberal-leaning programs. The notable absence of defense spending cuts casts doubt on the sincerity of the deficit reduction effort. Ultimately, the limited success highlights the difficulty of substantial cost reduction and questions the prevalence of government waste as previously claimed.
John Q. Hosedrinker