Luigi Mangione’s defense team filed a motion to prevent the death penalty in the murder case of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, arguing that the Attorney General’s directive to seek capital punishment is a politically motivated “stunt” intended to align with President Trump’s agenda. The motion cites procedural irregularities, including the alleged ignoring of a request for time to prepare a mitigation submission and claims of prejudicial public statements by the Attorney General. Mangione faces both federal and state charges, including first-degree murder in furtherance of terrorism, and has pleaded not guilty to the state charges. The defense seeks to screen jurors from the Attorney General’s potentially biased comments.
Read More
Luigi Mangione’s legal team filed a motion in Manhattan’s U.S. District Court to prevent the federal government from pursuing the death penalty in the murder case of UnitedHealth Group CEO Brian Thompson. The defense argues that Attorney General Bondi’s actions violated Mangione’s due process rights by bypassing standard procedures and prejudicing potential grand jurors. This alleged procedural violation is compounded by Bondi’s public statements linking the death penalty pursuit to President Trump’s political agenda. The defense contends that the death penalty is being sought as a political maneuver, not based on legal merit.
Read More
Following the December 4th murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the Department of Justice will seek the death penalty against suspect Luigi Mangione. This decision, made after careful consideration, cites the premeditated nature of the crime and aligns with the administration’s commitment to combating violent crime. Mangione, 26, faces federal charges including murder, stalking, and firearms offenses stemming from the incident outside the Hilton Hotel. His legal team, which now includes a death penalty expert, has yet to respond to the Attorney General’s announcement.
Read More
Patrick Crusius, the El Paso Walmart shooter responsible for 23 deaths in a 2019 hate crime, has been offered a plea deal in state court to avoid the death penalty. This follows his 2023 federal conviction resulting in 90 consecutive life sentences. While the state District Attorney supports the death penalty and believes Crusius deserves it, the decision was made in part due to the victims’ families’ desire for closure and to avoid protracted legal battles. Federal prosecutors also declined to pursue the death penalty, though reasons were not fully disclosed.
Read More
Iwao Hakamata, a former professional boxer, was awarded over $1.4 million in compensation after spending 40 years on death row for a quadruple murder he did not commit. His 1968 conviction was overturned last year following DNA evidence proving the incriminating bloodstained clothing was planted. The Shizuoka District Court’s decision marks the highest payout ever for a wrongful conviction in Japan, though his lawyer stated the sum cannot atone for his suffering. Hakamata’s case has drawn international attention to Japan’s justice system and fueled calls for death penalty abolition.
Read More
Jessie Hoffman Jr., convicted of murder, became the fifth person in the U.S. executed by nitrogen gas, ending a 15-year hiatus in Louisiana executions. The Supreme Court rejected a last-minute appeal, and Hoffman was pronounced dead after 19 minutes of gas administration, reportedly exhibiting convulsions. This execution method, while argued by Hoffman’s lawyers as unconstitutional, is maintained by state officials as painless despite observed involuntary movements consistent with oxygen deprivation. Louisiana’s Attorney General anticipates at least four more executions this year.
Read More
A federal appeals court overturned Brittany Marlowe Holberg’s death sentence, a decision stemming from the prosecution’s failure to disclose that their key witness, a paid informant, had recanted her testimony. The 2-1 ruling by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals cited a violation of Holberg’s due process rights under the Brady doctrine, finding the undisclosed information crucial to the jury’s verdict. This decision reverses lower court rulings and sends the case back to the trial court. The appeals court judge highlighted the significant impact of Holberg’s 27 years on death row, emphasizing the ongoing need for improvement within the capital punishment system.
Read More
Brad Sigmon, 67, was executed by firing squad in South Carolina, the first such execution in the U.S. in 15 years. He chose this method over lethal injection or the electric chair due to concerns about their potential effects. Three prison employees carried out the execution, firing simultaneously at Sigmon from 15 feet away. Sigmon’s last statement urged fellow Christians to abolish the death penalty.
Read More
President Trump’s executive order mandating the death penalty for anyone convicted of killing a police officer is deeply problematic. This policy ignores the possibility of wrongful convictions, as evidenced by the case of Alexander Villa, whose conviction for a police officer’s murder was overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct. The order’s potential for executing innocent individuals highlights the dangers of eliminating judicial discretion in sentencing. This contrasts sharply with Trump’s prior pardoning of individuals convicted of attacking police officers, raising serious concerns about fairness and consistency in the application of justice.
Read More
The Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision, granted death row inmate Richard Glossip a new trial, reversing the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Sotomayor, cited the prosecution’s failure to disclose key evidence of the key witness’s mental illness and drug use. Justice Thomas, dissenting, sharply criticized the majority for “stretching the law at every turn” to prevent Glossip’s execution, arguing the Court disregarded established legal principles and the victim’s family’s wishes. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s ruling.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker