Establishment Democrats are actively working to undermine progressive candidate Zohran Mamdani in the New York City mayoral primary, despite claims of being perplexed by the party’s declining support. Former Democratic activist David Hogg criticized the party for its opposition to Mamdani, highlighting the hypocrisy of spending millions to defeat him while simultaneously seeking ways to regain young voters. Mamdani’s grassroots campaign, fueled by widespread support among young voters, contrasts with the establishment’s efforts, which are backed by significant funding and endorsements. Ultimately, the article posits that the Democratic Party’s strategy of opposing left-leaning campaigns may be a contributing factor to its loss of support among younger voters.
Read More
David Hogg doubles down after controversy: ‘I’m not going anywhere’ seems to be the rallying cry, and it’s sparking a whole range of reactions, to say the least. This young activist, known for his advocacy against gun violence, appears to be digging in his heels. Some view this as a defiant act of perseverance, while others see it as a continuation of a problematic approach. The fact that he is choosing to make his voice heard is itself seen by many to be a good thing.
His decision not to run again for his spot in the DNC might seem like a step back, but it’s clear that he’s still planning to challenge incumbents.… Continue reading
David Hogg’s departure from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) following a backlash against his primary challenge plan highlights a deep fissure within the party. His plan, to actively challenge incumbent Democrats in primary races, ignited a furious response from many within the party establishment. The move ultimately led to a vote removing him from his vice chair position, prompting his resignation.
This situation underscores a significant generational divide within the Democratic party. Many feel the party is plagued by entrenched, long-serving members, some nearing the end of their careers, who are resistant to change and no longer effectively represent the needs of the electorate.… Continue reading
DNC Vice Chair David Hogg endorsed Rep. Jasmine Crockett, praising her combative political style and authenticity, amid the Democratic Party’s post-election identity crisis. This endorsement comes as Hogg faces potential removal from his position due to procedural issues surrounding his election. Crockett, known for her strong criticism of President Trump and controversial statements, is vying for a leadership role on the House Oversight Committee. Hogg’s support signals a potential shift within the Democrats towards a more confrontational approach.
Read More
David Hogg, DNC vice-chair and gun-control activist, argues the Democratic party needs more combative leadership and generational change to address declining support and recent electoral losses. He advocates for competitive primaries to inject new energy and challenge entrenched establishment figures, launching “Leaders We Deserve” to support progressive primary challengers in safe Democratic districts. However, this initiative has faced internal opposition within the DNC, leading to tensions and challenges to his vice-chair election. Hogg emphasizes the need for Democrats to connect with voters’ feelings, fight for meaningful reforms, and present a clear alternative vision for the country’s future.
Read More
A DNC panel overturned David Hogg’s election as vice chair, citing a procedural violation of gender parity rules. Hogg, who has openly criticized the DNC for inaction against the Trump administration, attributes the decision to his broader efforts to reform the party through his PAC, Leaders We Deserve. This action follows criticism from DNC Chair Ken Martin regarding Hogg’s PAC funding primary challengers. Hogg maintains his criticisms are justified given the party’s perceived complacency, while fellow Vice Chair Kenyatta expressed frustration with the decision.
Read More
The Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) move to potentially nullify the election of David Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta as vice chairs has ignited a firestorm of debate. The core issue stems from a procedural irregularity: Hogg and Kenyatta were elected on a combined ballot, a practice allegedly violating DNC rules.
This procedural error has led to a cascade of events. Initially, a committee voted on the matter, failing to reach a consensus. A subsequent vote recommended a new election for the vice chair positions. Now, the full DNC membership will decide whether to uphold this recommendation or to validate the original results.… Continue reading
David Hogg, a DNC vice chair, faces potential removal for his PAC’s $20 million investment in primary challenges against incumbent Democrats. This action, intended to strengthen the party, has drawn criticism, with DNC Chair Ken Martin suggesting rule changes to prevent such conflicts of interest. Despite the backlash and a public clash with James Carville, Hogg remains committed to his efforts, emphasizing the need for stronger Democratic candidates and addressing voter concerns on issues like gun violence and economic inequality. The situation may lead to Hogg’s resignation from either his PAC or his DNC position.
Read More
March For Our Lives activist and DNC vice chair David Hogg announced a $20 million plan, through his organization Leaders We Deserve, to primary incumbent House Democrats deemed insufficiently progressive. This initiative aims to elect younger candidates who prioritize gun control, reject corporate donations, and actively combat special interests influencing policy. Hogg emphasizes the need for Democrats to address rising costs of living and campaign finance reform, arguing that these issues are crucial to regaining public trust. While facing criticism from some party elites, Hogg contends this strategy is necessary to revitalize the party and better represent its constituents.
Read More
House Democrats are expressing significant anger towards David Hogg’s plan to unseat incumbent lawmakers. The intensity of their reaction speaks volumes about the underlying tensions within the party.
This outrage underscores a deep-seated frustration among many Democrats, who feel their party hasn’t been sufficiently aggressive in addressing the challenges posed by the current political climate.
The anger highlights a divide between established party leadership and a more progressive, activist wing. The established figures appear to view Hogg’s initiative as a direct threat to their power and influence.
Many believe this response demonstrates a disconnect between the party’s leadership and the concerns of its base.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood