A concerning revelation has emerged regarding a purported “DOGE official” employed within the Department of Justice. This individual, seemingly far from the computer whiz-kid ideal often touted, allegedly boasted about engaging in hacking activities and distributing pirated software. This raises serious questions about the vetting processes and overall security within governmental organizations.
The apparent ease with which this individual secured a position of responsibility within the DOJ is deeply unsettling. It suggests a significant lapse in security protocols and background checks, leaving sensitive government data potentially vulnerable. The notion that someone who openly admitted to such activities could gain employment highlights a concerning lack of due diligence.… Continue reading
Reporters utilized publicly available data, including leaked customer information, and commercial people search engines to uncover active contact details for high-profile individuals. These details, encompassing phone numbers and email addresses, remain largely functional and are linked to various online platforms including social media, cloud storage services, and fitness tracking apps. Affected individuals include National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. The easily accessible nature of this sensitive information highlights significant security vulnerabilities.
Read More
Reporters utilized publicly available data, including leaked customer information and commercial search engines, to uncover active contact details for high-profile individuals. These details, belonging to figures such as National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, remain largely operational. The exposed information includes phone numbers and email addresses linked to various online platforms, including social media, file storage services, and fitness tracking apps. This data further reveals the presence of associated WhatsApp and, in some instances, Signal accounts.
Read More
Facing financial difficulties and a £4.59 million fine from the UK’s ICO for a 2023 data breach, 23andMe has filed for bankruptcy protection. Co-founder and CEO Anne Wojcicki has resigned, with the company now seeking a buyer under court supervision. While 23andMe assures customers that data remains secure, the California Attorney General advises users to delete their information. The company, once valued at $6 billion, has struggled to maintain profitability since its 2021 IPO and ultimately failed to successfully pivot its business model.
Read More
Following the revelation that Trump administration officials shared war plans via a secure app including a journalist, GOP consultant Sarah Longwell condemned the actions on X. She characterized the officials as “idiots,” emphasizing the significant danger of their actions. The incident highlights a concerning breach of security and demonstrates a profound lack of judgment.
Read More
The sheer audacity of it all is breathtaking. Imagine: top-level US government officials, supposedly strategizing about sensitive military operations, doing so over a group chat app so insecure that it invites accidental inclusion of a journalist. This wasn’t some encrypted, secure channel—this was a casual group chat, seemingly open to anyone, with messages disappearing after just four weeks. This is not just a lapse in judgment; it’s a blatant disregard for established security protocols.
The casual use of emojis only adds to the shocking incompetence. One can easily envision the seriousness of the situation being undercut by a poorly placed smiley face or a thumbs-up emoji amid discussions of potential attacks.… Continue reading
The Trump administration’s release of 64,000 unredacted JFK assassination files inadvertently exposed the personal information of hundreds of Americans, including Social Security numbers. This action prompted outrage from former government officials whose data was compromised, citing risks of identity theft and threats. While the White House acknowledged the error and initiated a response plan with the National Archives and Social Security Administration, the release yielded no significant new revelations about the assassination itself. Critics condemned the release as reckless and unprofessional, highlighting the potential harm inflicted on individuals without sufficient consideration.
Read More
The release of unredacted JFK assassination files resulted in the accidental disclosure of sensitive personal information, including Social Security numbers, prompting outrage and legal action. Former Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova plans to sue the National Archives, citing negligence in the review process. The White House claims the release fulfilled a promise of transparency and that a plan is in place to offer credit monitoring and new Social Security numbers to affected individuals. However, the decision-making process behind the release of this personal data remains unexplained.
Read More
A Maryland federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing sensitive personal data held by the Department of Education and Office of Personnel Management. The judge found that granting DOGE broad access to this information, including social security numbers and financial details, violated the Privacy Act of 1974. The lawsuit, filed by unions representing federal employees and student aid recipients, argued the access posed a significant identity theft risk. The court determined that while a “need-to-know” exception might exist, the government failed to justify DOGE’s sweeping access to millions of records for its stated purpose of auditing student loan programs. The order temporarily protects the plaintiffs’ data, pending further justification from the administration.
Read More
Federal Judge Deborah Boardman issued a temporary restraining order, preventing the Department of Education and Office of Personnel Management from sharing personal data with DOGE affiliates until March 10th, citing violations of the Privacy Act. This follows a similar preliminary injunction issued by a New York court blocking Treasury Department data access to DOGE. Both rulings address concerns about unauthorized disclosure of sensitive personal information to DOGE, deemed irreparable harm. The Maryland court declined to extend its order to Treasury data due to the pre-existing New York injunction.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker