Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky granted an exclusive interview to France Télévisions and European public broadcasters ahead of the Paris Peace and Security Summit for Ukraine. The interview, featuring questions from journalists representing major European networks, will air on TV5MONDE and was broadcast live across Europe. This special broadcast prompted France 2 to reschedule its previously planned programming. Zelensky addressed European concerns and the ongoing conflict directly from Paris.
Read More
Trump’s declaration that the US “must have” Greenland has sparked outrage and disbelief worldwide. The sheer audacity of the statement, coupled with the lack of any justifiable reasoning beyond a simple desire for possession, is alarming many. The idea that the US, a nation boasting a powerful military and significant global influence, would resort to such a blatant power grab is deeply unsettling. The casual disregard for international norms and the potential for escalating conflict are fueling widespread condemnation.
The suggestion that the US needs Greenland for “international safety and security” rings hollow. Existing military alliances and established bases in the region already provide a level of security.… Continue reading
Ukraine’s President Zelenskiy’s claim that Russia is already manipulating agreements brokered by the US isn’t surprising to anyone paying attention. Russia has a long history of operating in bad faith, consistently undermining agreements for its own gain. This current situation seems to be a carefully orchestrated setup for failure.
The core issue lies in discrepancies between agreements reached by Russia and Ukraine. It appears that Russia’s version included stipulations like sanctions relief, elements conspicuously absent from the Ukrainian agreement. This creates a built-in conflict, making it virtually impossible to uphold the agreement’s integrity. Essentially, Russia is exploiting these discrepancies to violate the spirit, if not the letter, of the accord, painting Ukraine as the uncooperative party.… Continue reading
It’s Over. America Has Ceased to be Leader of the Free World. The assertion that America is no longer the leader of the free world isn’t a contentious claim; it feels like a stark reality. The weight of this statement hangs heavy, a consequence of a confluence of factors that have eroded America’s global standing and influence.
It’s a sentiment shared far beyond American borders. International observers, from Canada to the UK, voice similar concerns, creating a disquieting sense of global consensus on America’s decline. This widespread agreement breeds a profound sense of national shame, a feeling of having fallen short of expectations, and of deserving the criticism levied from abroad.… Continue reading
Less than 1 in 5 Americans favor annexing Canada and Greenland, according to a recent survey, a statistic that reveals a concerning undercurrent of support for a deeply problematic idea. Nearly half of those surveyed, a significant 49 percent, outright rejected the notion. This leaves a considerable portion of the population, 32 percent, expressing uncertainty about the prospect. The sheer number of individuals who are unsure about the implications of invading and annexing sovereign nations is alarming in itself, highlighting a potential lack of understanding of international relations and the gravity of such actions.
The fact that a substantial 17-20 percent expressed support for this aggressive action is deeply troubling.… Continue reading
Following talks in Saudi Arabia, Russia and Ukraine agreed to eliminate the use of force and ensure safe navigation in the Black Sea, a key step toward a broader peace deal. The agreement includes preventing the use of commercial vessels for military purposes and the development of measures to halt strikes against energy infrastructure. The United States pledged support to facilitate Russian agricultural and fertilizer exports. However, significant obstacles remain, including Ukraine’s refusal to recognize Russian territorial claims and concerns regarding the enforceability of the agreements.
Read More
In her strongest rebuke yet, Prime Minister Frederiksen denounced President Trump’s pursuit of Greenland, emphasizing his serious intent to acquire the territory through potentially forceful means. This follows Trump’s renewed interest in Greenland’s resources and strategic location, despite Greenland’s current lack of government and its expressed unwillingness to host him. Frederiksen underscored that Trump’s actions cannot be ignored and pose a genuine threat. However, she affirmed Denmark and Greenland’s commitment to cooperating with the U.S. within existing agreements.
Read More
The United States is applying unacceptable pressure on Greenland, according to Denmark’s Prime Minister. This pressure is deemed unacceptable and will be resisted. The assertion stems from a planned visit by a high-profile U.S. delegation, a visit that was not officially invited by either the Greenlandic or Danish governments. The delegation, including the wife of the Vice President and key White House officials, plans to “learn about Greenland, its culture, history, and people,” according to a White House spokesperson. However, the Danish Prime Minister dismisses this characterization, stating that an uninvited visit by official representatives from another country cannot be considered private.… Continue reading
Following a contentious Oval Office meeting between Presidents Trump and Zelenskyy, the White House pressured UK Prime Minister Starmer to publicly criticize Zelenskyy. Starmer instead opted to mediate, dispatching his national security advisor to Kyiv to facilitate reconciliation. Subsequently, Starmer briefed Trump on the progress and helped arrange a call between the two presidents, resulting in Zelenskyy expressing support for Trump’s peace initiatives. This diplomatic intervention followed an earlier scheduled departure of Zelenskyy from the White House and aimed to repair damaged relations. Starmer’s actions prioritized de-escalation over immediate compliance with US pressure.
Read More
Tourism Economics predicts a $64 billion loss for the US tourism sector in 2025, driven by a projected 5.1% drop in foreign arrivals. This decline is attributed to President Trump’s policies, including tariffs and stricter immigration, which have fostered negative global sentiment toward the US. A significant decrease in visitor spending is also anticipated, impacting various sectors from airlines to major sporting events. While some tourists remain unaffected, key markets like Canada and Western Europe are showing significant declines in travel to the US.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood