Amir-Saeid Iravani, Iran’s UN ambassador, stated that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program is a right and will continue, citing its permitted use for peaceful energy. He expressed Iran’s readiness for negotiations, rejecting “unconditional surrender” as a basis, while denying any threats against IAEA officials but acknowledging suspended cooperation with the agency. Iravani indicated that the transfer of enriched uranium could be considered, but Iran would not relinquish its domestic uranium production, a condition the US rejects. These comments come amid discussions about the recent strikes on Iranian facilities, with differing assessments of the damage.
Read More
Thank you for subscribing to the NP Posted newsletter. Your welcome email is currently en route and may appear in your junk folder if not found in your inbox. The next installment of NP Posted will be delivered to your email address soon. By subscribing, you have agreed to receive the newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Read More
Following a significant breach of the ceasefire by the Iranian regime, the Israel Defense Force announced it would retaliate with force, with the Defense Minister ordering intense strikes. Despite the agreed-upon truce, a series of attacks occurred between the two nations, with Tehran launching missiles and Israel conducting airstrikes. This followed earlier military actions by Israel targeting Iran’s nuclear program, which led to the U.S. entering the war. The conflict ultimately concluded in a ceasefire which was quickly violated.
Read More
Hours after announcing a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, President Trump expressed frustration at both nations for perceived violations. Despite the ceasefire’s immediate implementation, Israel reported a missile launch from Iran, prompting threats of retaliation, which Trump swiftly attempted to quell. Trump’s social media posts demanded Israel cease attacks, emphasizing the ceasefire’s importance and threatening consequences for non-compliance. His announcement of the ceasefire was met with criticism for its tone of success, as experts began to question its effectiveness, resulting in him directing his anger toward news networks and suggesting his own strikes over the weekend were the reason for the ceasefire.
Read More
Following a U.S. strike on three Iranian nuclear sites, the State Department issued a worldwide caution for Americans abroad, citing potential disruptions to travel and demonstrations against U.S. interests. The strikes, which President Trump deemed “very successful,” have escalated tensions in the region, prompting Iran to warn of consequences. As a result, the Department of Homeland Security issued a National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin, warning of a heightened threat environment in the United States. The State Department is urging U.S. citizens to exercise increased caution and review travel advisories.
Read More
Iran launches missiles at U.S. military bases in the Middle East. This situation, as many predicted, has now become a reality. The anticipation of retaliation from Iran was almost universal, making the recent missile launches a predictable consequence of escalating tensions. It’s a moment that underscores the interconnectedness of global politics and the potential for conflict to quickly spiral.
The expectation of this response wasn’t just a hunch; it was informed by the historical patterns of international relations. When one nation takes aggressive military action against another, a reaction is almost inevitable. The complexities of the situation are also exacerbated by the different players involved and their individual motivations.… Continue reading
Taiwan’s president recently stated unequivocally that Taiwan is, of course, a country. This declaration serves as a direct rebuke to China, which considers Taiwan a breakaway province and has consistently threatened military action should the island formally declare independence. The statement’s significance lies in its unambiguous nature; it breaks from the previously more ambiguous official pronouncements from Taiwan, which carefully navigated the complex geopolitical landscape. This assertive stance shifts the dynamics of the Taiwan Strait significantly.
The president’s words represent a bold move, potentially escalating tensions with China. For years, Taiwan has maintained a delicate balance, asserting its own sovereignty while carefully avoiding a direct declaration of independence to lessen the risk of immediate conflict.… Continue reading
Following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Iran’s military issued a strongly worded warning to President Trump, labeling him a “gambler” and vowing retaliatory action with “heavy, regretful, and unpredictable consequences.” Tehran accused the U.S. of violating its sovereignty and acting as an accomplice to Israel, broadening the scope of potential Iranian targets. In response to the strikes, Iran launched ballistic missiles at Israel and threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, escalating regional tensions and potentially destabilizing global markets. International efforts to de-escalate the situation are underway amid rising concerns of a wider conflict.
Read More
Days before a US airstrike on Iranian nuclear sites, Iran reportedly threatened to activate sleeper cells within the US as retaliation. This threat, communicated to President Trump, did not prevent the attack. Following the strike, senior Iranian military officials vowed a decisive response, hinting at potential actions against US troops. Further, Iran reportedly prepared to close the Strait of Hormuz, a move with significant global economic implications.
Read More
Foreign Minister Winston Peters stated that New Zealand’s condemnation of Iran’s actions did not automatically equate to support for the US airstrikes. He emphasized that such military action would only be justifiable if Iran possessed a significant nuclear weapons capability. This conditional support highlights a nuanced position on the conflict. The level of Iran’s nuclear preparedness, therefore, becomes the key determinant of New Zealand’s stance on the US response.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood