D.C. Circuit Court

Trump Admin to Escalate DC Military Presence After National Guard Shooting

Trump Administration’s actions are poised to escalate the military presence in Washington, D.C. following the tragic shooting of two National Guard members. This event, occurring amidst an already tense political climate and a court order to reduce military presence, raises serious concerns about the administration’s intentions. It’s difficult to ignore the potential for this incident to be exploited to further an agenda of increased control and an authoritarian direction.

The timing of this shooting is, to put it mildly, suspect. Given the court order demanding the removal of troops, the fact that such an event occurred shortly after is extremely difficult to disregard.… Continue reading

Federal Agent Shoots in D.C., Report Omits Incident: Corruption Concerns

During a traffic stop in D.C. on October 17, a Homeland Security Investigations agent reportedly fired at least three shots at Phillip Brown, the driver of a vehicle, an incident not initially documented by Metropolitan Police Department officers in their reports. Despite two bullets piercing the passenger seat and one grazing Brown’s jacket, the officers omitted the shooting from their affidavit and incident report, allegedly due to instructions from a “team leader.” Brown was initially charged with fleeing law enforcement, but the charges were later dismissed, and the U.S. attorney offered a plea deal without knowledge of the shooting or access to body camera footage. Brown’s defense attorney is raising concerns about the withholding of critical evidence and the lack of transparency in the investigation.

Read More

Appeals Court Reinstates Fired FTC Member, Trump’s Action Invalidated

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled to reinstate Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, appointed by President Biden, after a prior attempt by former President Trump to remove her. The court determined Slaughter could only be removed under specific conditions: inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office, which were not cited in the original dismissal attempt. This case is part of a larger trend of lawsuits challenging Trump’s efforts to remove Democrat-appointed leaders from federal agencies. The ruling underscores historical efforts by Congress to protect these agencies from political interference.

Read More