Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov firmly rejected any changes to the management of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP), currently operated by Russia’s Rosatom and monitored by the IAEA. He dismissed a reported US proposal for joint US-Ukrainian control, asserting the plant’s safety and blaming Ukraine for attacks threatening its security. Lavrov further defended recent Russian missile strikes on Kyiv, claiming they targeted military facilities, and reiterated Russia’s stance on Crimea as a non-negotiable part of its territory. He also alleged that former US President Trump understands Russia’s position.
Read More
Following a meeting with Ukrainian President Zelensky at the Vatican, former US President Trump stated his belief that Zelensky is willing to cede Crimea to Russia as part of a peace deal. Trump urged both Putin and Zelensky to negotiate a ceasefire, suggesting a deal could be reached within two weeks. This assertion contradicts Ukraine’s repeated refusal to negotiate territorial concessions before a ceasefire is established, and has drawn criticism from German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, who deemed it akin to capitulation. Proposed US peace plans reportedly include Russian annexation of Crimea and other occupied territories, while counter-proposals insist on discussing territorial issues only after a ceasefire.
Read More
The recent US peace proposal, suggesting a potential resolution to the conflict in Ukraine, has been met with staunch resistance from Ukrainians, particularly regarding Crimea. The idea of formally surrendering Crimea is completely unacceptable to them. The very notion that any external power could dictate such a significant territorial concession is viewed as insulting and deeply offensive. Ukraine has endured a prolonged and brutal assault, resisting Russian aggression with remarkable resilience, and the suggestion of simply giving up territory as a means to achieve peace is viewed as a betrayal of their sacrifices.
The reaction is rooted in a firm belief that Ukraine is far from defeated.… Continue reading
In a recent interview, former President Trump reiterated his belief that Ukraine’s NATO aspirations instigated the war with Russia, asserting that Crimea is permanently lost to Ukraine. He further claimed responsibility for increased European defense spending and characterized his current political position as less constrained than during his first term. This statement follows previous assertions by Trump suggesting Ukrainian actions, including seeking defensive weaponry, initiated the conflict. The interview comes amid reports of a US peace proposal potentially recognizing Russia’s control over Crimea, a position at odds with Ukraine’s objectives.
Read More
A proposed US-brokered peace deal, reportedly including US recognition of Crimea and Russian-occupied territories since 2022, represents a near-total capitulation to Russia’s demands. This would effectively reward Russian aggression and establish a new global paradigm where territorial gains are legitimized through force. The deal also includes the lifting of US sanctions on Russia and increased US-Russia cooperation, significantly bolstering Russia’s economic and military capabilities. Ukraine’s rejection of this proposal is understandable, as it would effectively erase its sovereignty and dismantle the post-war European order. The only remaining hope lies in Europe’s independent defense of its values.
Read More
President Zelensky firmly rejected any negotiation involving the cession of Crimea to Russia, emphasizing that such discussions would legitimize the illegal annexation and prolong the conflict. He warned that ceding territory plays into Putin’s strategy, and Ukraine will immediately reject any formal proposal to that effect. While acknowledging potential peace proposals circulating, Zelensky stressed Ukraine’s unwavering stance and its readiness to negotiate only after a complete cessation of hostilities. Continued international pressure, particularly from the U.S., remains crucial for achieving a resolution.
Read More
Following reports of increased security measures and a suspension of shore leave in Crimea, families of senior Russian Black Sea Fleet officers have reportedly evacuated the peninsula. This heightened security, including covert patrols and the concealment of military hardware, suggests a growing sense of vulnerability within the Russian military presence. These actions follow recent Ukrainian attacks on Russian military assets in Crimea, and coincide with discussions of supplying Ukraine with long-range missiles capable of striking key infrastructure. The Atesh partisan group, known for its sabotage operations in occupied territories, attributes the heightened security and evacuations to increasing anxiety within Russian ranks.
Read More
Despite Russia’s declared Easter ceasefire, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy reported continued Russian shelling and assaults, stating a lack of trust in Moscow’s pronouncements. Zelenskyy proposed reciprocating a true, unconditional ceasefire beyond Easter, contrasting this with Russia’s rejection of a prior US-proposed 30-day truce. Simultaneously, reports emerged of potential US concessions, including recognizing Crimea as Russian territory, to facilitate a peace deal, a move sparking controversy. This potential agreement, reportedly being pushed by the Trump administration, would see Russia retain occupied Ukrainian lands, potentially alongside sanctions relief.
Read More
Friedrich Merz, advocating for a proactive Ukrainian military stance, proposed supplying Taurus long-range missiles to strike key Russian infrastructure in Crimea, including the Kerch Bridge. This action, Merz argues, would shift the battlefield dynamic and leverage existing Western support for similar Ukrainian missile capabilities from the US, UK, and France. While Chancellor Scholz previously opposed this, Merz’s potential chancellorship makes this a likely future policy consideration, though support from coalition partners remains uncertain. Merz emphasized this is to empower Ukraine, not to involve Germany directly in combat.
Read More
Following US-brokered talks, both Zelensky and Putin have, in principle, agreed to a ceasefire, though implementation remains stalled due to conflicting conditions. While Putin agreed to halt strikes on energy infrastructure, such attacks continue from both sides. Zelensky, rejecting US ownership of Ukrainian nuclear plants, nonetheless expressed openness to US investment in their modernization, particularly at the Zaporizhzhia plant. He firmly rejected territorial concessions, including Crimea, and stipulated a land and sea ceasefire as the initial step toward ending Russian aggression.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood