Following the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent, several Republican officials prioritized defending the shooter and criticizing dissent. Representative Roger Williams of Texas urged citizens to cease demonstrations and become “civil,” suggesting that such actions provoked the incident. Similarly, Representative Wesley Hunt of Texas emphasized the importance of following federal officer instructions, while Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem questioned the rationale behind disputing a president perceived as focused on safety. These statements reflect a broader trend within the party to suppress dissent and defend law enforcement.
Read More
Following Kim Jong Un’s New Year’s Day address, which was distributed to factories and enterprises across North Korea, many workers expressed discontent with the speech’s content. Sources revealed that workers in Hoeryong, Kim’s hometown, abruptly left reading sessions due to the speech’s emphasis on continued sacrifices for the country. The address, which focused on the people’s patriotism and loyalty as the driving force behind overcoming challenges, was met with frustration, particularly concerning the constant demands for unpaid labor. This response sharply contrasts with the state media’s portrayal of widespread enthusiasm and endorsement of the address across all sectors of society.
Read More
The article identifies several groups supporting Trump, each with distinct motivations for their allegiance. Corporate figures and business leaders, the second group, remain silent due to fear of retribution or the desire for tax cuts, prioritizing self-interest over acknowledging Trump’s potential harm. The right-wing media outlets, the third group, utilize a combination of cynicism, driven by profit, and genuine ideological opposition to liberalism to promote Trump. Finally, the MAGA faithful encompasses both soft supporters with varied motivations, such as economic nostalgia or religious conservatism, and the more fervent Trump loyalists.
Read More
A Russian court sentenced pro-war activist Sergei Udaltsov to six years in prison on charges of justifying terrorism. The charges stemmed from an online article supporting other Russian activists previously convicted of forming a terrorist organization. Udaltsov, leader of the Left Front movement, rejected the accusations, calling the verdict “shameful,” and has announced a hunger strike. This sentence marks another instance of the Russian government’s intensified crackdown on dissent, a trend that has significantly escalated since the invasion of Ukraine.
Read More
Pussy Riot, the Russian anti-Kremlin feminist punk band, has been officially designated as an extremist organization by a Moscow court, effectively banning their activities within Russia. This ruling, sought by the General Prosecutor’s Office, comes amidst a broader crackdown on dissent, particularly against those who have criticized the war in Ukraine. The designation, which mirrors that of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Alexei Navalny’s political organization, will enable authorities to target the band’s supporters and those who have collaborated with them. Founder Nadya Tolokonnikova, who is currently outside of Russia, has responded by embracing the extremist label, arguing that speaking the truth in today’s Russia is considered extremism.
Read More
The New Normal: Trump Decides Which Beliefs Are ‘Legal’: When dissent becomes an “indicator,” the First Amendment stops being a right and starts being a risk.
It’s a chilling prospect: a government actively seeking out and investigating its own citizens based on their beliefs. This isn’t the premise of a dystopian novel; it’s the reality unfolding under a directive that, frankly, sounds like something out of a satirical newspaper. National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7) orders the FBI and other agencies to target individuals and groups based on a list of “indicators” – markers of potential domestic terrorism. These indicators, however, aren’t about violent acts.… Continue reading
Teenage Russian street musician jailed over anti-Kremlin songs is detained as she leaves jail. It’s truly a statement about the state of affairs when a teenage musician, armed with nothing more than a voice and a guitar, can incite such a level of fear within a government. The fact that the regime felt threatened enough to imprison her initially, and then to immediately detain her again upon her release, paints a rather bleak picture of the tolerance for dissent. It speaks volumes about the fragility of power when it’s so easily rattled by a pop song. It’s hard not to find the whole situation a little pathetic.… Continue reading
A viral video captured a gathering in St. Petersburg where people sang an anti-war song by Noize MC, a Russian musician labeled a “foreign agent.” The song, “Cooperative Swan Lake,” criticizes the government and the war in Ukraine, with lyrics specifically condemning Kremlin propaganda. The individual leading the sing-along was reportedly arrested, sparking outrage from ultra-nationalist Russians. This act of defiance, amidst a crackdown on dissent, underscores the risks associated with public opposition to the war and the government within Russia.
Read More
Following the assassination of conservative podcaster Charlie Kirk, the Trump administration swiftly implemented plans to target perceived liberal adversaries. Led by Stephen Miller, the administration drafted legal memos and prioritized organizations for scrutiny using existing anti-terrorism laws. This “war on terror” focused on groups like antifa and George Soros’s network. Despite concerns from some officials about the lack of a real terror threat, the administration aimed to use legal and financial means to silence dissent, as well as silence individuals who spoke out against Donald Trump.
Read More
The article discusses the potential for the Trump administration to implement a crackdown on dissent, using the death of Charlie Kirk as a catalyst. The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, and the subsequent executive order designating “antifa” as a domestic terrorist organization, provides a framework for increased surveillance and suppression of leftist groups. This action, informed by loose FBI guidelines and a preventative approach to counterterrorism, mirrors existing FBI powers and could lead to the misuse of federal law enforcement resources against groups and individuals across the left. This move represents an escalation of tactics that has been developing for over 100 years, and could be uniquely concerning and authoritarian.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
ICE Declares “Wartime”: Recruitment Targets and Erosion of American Values
The article identifies several groups supporting Trump, each with distinct motivations for their allegiance. Corporate figures and business leaders, the second group, remain silent due to fear of retribution or the desire for tax cuts, prioritizing self-interest over acknowledging Trump’s potential harm. The right-wing media outlets, the third group, utilize a combination of cynicism, driven by profit, and genuine ideological opposition to liberalism to promote Trump. Finally, the MAGA faithful encompasses both soft supporters with varied motivations, such as economic nostalgia or religious conservatism, and the more fervent Trump loyalists.
Read More