A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration violated a court order by deporting eight migrants to countries other than their own, including South Sudan, without giving them sufficient opportunity to claim fear of persecution or torture. The administration deported individuals with criminal convictions, despite a prior injunction preventing such deportations to third countries. The judge ordered that the deported individuals be given a reasonable fear interview and the same access to legal counsel they would have had in the U.S. The White House defended its actions, claiming compliance with court orders, while the judge highlighted the migrants’ insufficient notice before deportation and lack of access to legal representation. This ruling follows a similar injunction blocking deportations to Libya.
Read More
Immigrant rights advocates are raising serious concerns about the US government’s deportation of migrants to South Sudan, claiming it directly violates a prior court order. The alleged deportations, involving individuals originally from Myanmar and Vietnam, highlight the complex and troubling issues surrounding immigration policy and the enforcement of judicial rulings. The situation underscores a broader pattern of disregard for legal processes.
This alleged action is particularly concerning given the current state of South Sudan. The US State Department’s travel advisory clearly warns against travel to the country due to widespread crime, kidnapping, and ongoing armed conflict between political and ethnic groups.… Continue reading
The Trump administration’s halting of NIH study section submissions to the Federal Register effectively shut down the NIH’s extramural research program, likely violating a court order. This action prevents the peer review of grant proposals, delaying billions of dollars in crucial medical research funding. The administration’s actions, which even some within the NIH struggle to comprehend, have caused widespread confusion and significant delays, potentially jeopardizing ongoing research projects. This blatant disregard for judicial mandates leaves open the possibility of further legal repercussions for those involved.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood