A judge has ordered daily updates on whether the Trump administration is complying with a court order to return an illegally deported man to the United States. This unprecedented demand underscores the gravity of the situation and the apparent lack of cooperation from the administration. The judge’s action is a clear attempt to hold the administration accountable and ensure transparency in a case with potentially life-or-death consequences.
The daily updates requirement, however, is being met with resistance. The Justice Department has indicated a potential delay in complying until at least Monday, citing unpreparedness. This delay raises concerns that the administration is deliberately dragging its feet, possibly allowing more time for irreversible harm to befall the deported individual.… Continue reading
Following a court order, the Trump administration was found to have withheld FEMA funds from at least 19 states with Democratic attorneys general, despite Congressional appropriation. This withholding, evidenced by significant unmet funding requests (e.g., $120 million for Oregon, $6 million for Hawaii), directly violated the court’s mandate. The administration’s claim of a new review process was rejected, as the funds had been blocked since February, seemingly in compliance with a Trump executive order targeting “sanctuary” states. This action constitutes a clear breach of the court order.
Read More
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to preserve Signal chat logs related to the Yemen strikes. The gravity of this order is immediately apparent: the administration’s history suggests a disregard for legal directives, raising serious concerns about their compliance. The potential consequences of ignoring this order are significant, potentially ranging from contempt of court charges to further erosion of public trust.
The sheer audacity of ignoring a court order speaks volumes. The possibility of the administration simply deleting the chats, as suggested by some, highlights a deep-seated problem. Their past behavior, characterized by a pattern of disregard for legal processes and a penchant for obfuscation, fuels skepticism that they will cooperate.… Continue reading
A federal judge sharply questioned a Trump administration lawyer regarding the administration’s alleged disregard of an oral court order halting migrant deportations to El Salvador. The lawyer, claiming only written orders are binding, argued the administration complied with the subsequent written order, despite acknowledging non-compliance with the prior oral directive. The judge expressed astonishment at the administration’s invocation of national security concerns to justify withholding information, even from the court. Consequently, the judge ordered sworn declarations detailing the events and reasons for the secrecy.
Read More
A federal judge sharply criticized the Trump administration for its failure to comply with a 12-day-old temporary restraining order that unfroze USAID contract spending. Despite the order, the government continued to defy the court’s directive to restore funding to global aid programs. The judge issued highly specific instructions for compliance, demanding payment of all pre-February 13th invoices by midnight February 26th and the submission of a joint status report detailing compliance steps. Further, the court ordered the government to provide all internal directives regarding compliance with the order by noon on February 26th, setting the stage for potential future legal action.
Read More
Following a judge’s order, federal health agencies have reinstated numerous webpages and datasets previously removed due to a presidential executive order mandating the use of “sex” instead of “gender.” The restored information includes CDC data on adolescent health, HIV, and environmental health disparities, as well as FDA guidelines on gender in clinical trials. This action comes after a lawsuit filed by Doctors for America, alleging the removal of vital public health information. While some material has been restored, some links remain broken, indicating that the process is not yet fully complete.
Read More
A Rhode Island federal judge ordered the Trump administration to immediately reinstate funding for federal programs after finding them in violation of a court order pausing a spending freeze. The judge’s decision, in response to a lawsuit from 22 states and the District of Columbia, cited evidence of continued funding disruptions across multiple agencies. The administration’s defiance of the court order follows public statements from President Trump, Vice President Vance, and Elon Musk suggesting disregard for judicial rulings. Failure to comply could result in contempt charges against administration officials.
Read More
In response to concerns over the safety of FBI employees, a court order prevents the Department of Justice from publicly releasing a list of agents involved in January 6th investigations, including those working on the Trump case. This agreement, reached after a lawsuit filed by FBI employees and their union, mandates a two-day notice period before any dissemination of the list to any entity, including the White House or DOJ itself. The order stems from fears of targeted harassment and violence should the identities of these agents be revealed. This temporary measure allows the court to further consider the matter before a final ruling on a preliminary injunction.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker