Florida’s Attorney General, James Uthmeier, sued Target, alleging the company misled investors by failing to disclose the financial risks associated with its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, claims Target’s Pride month merchandise and broader DEI programs provoked a negative consumer backlash, harming sales and ultimately costing shareholders. Uthmeier argues this violates the Securities Exchange Act. The lawsuit follows similar actions against other corporations, highlighting a growing conservative backlash against corporate DEI policies.
Read More
Shareholders, represented by the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR), are pushing UnitedHealth Group to report on the economic consequences of delayed or denied healthcare. This non-binding proposal argues that UnitedHealth Group’s practices create macroeconomic risks impacting investor portfolios due to the company’s immense size and influence on the US healthcare system. UnitedHealth Group is contesting the proposal on grounds of vagueness, despite the proposal’s focus on transparency regarding the “externalities” of its operations. The proposal’s novelty highlights a growing concern over the broader economic impact of healthcare access limitations.
Read More
Target’s cofounder’s daughters, Anne and Lucy Dayton, publicly criticized the company’s recent rollback of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, arguing that this decision contradicts the company’s founding principles of customer focus and community well-being. They expressed concern over businesses succumbing to political pressure, asserting that ethical business models are not inherently illegal. This action follows Target’s decision to end programs supporting Black employees and businesses, a move mirroring similar cutbacks by other major corporations. Target declined to respond to the criticism.
Read More
Google executives addressed employee concerns regarding the termination of diversity initiatives and the retraction of its pledge against developing AI for weaponry and surveillance. The changes, explained as compliance with evolving legal directives and a desire for greater involvement in geopolitical discussions, have eliminated diversity training programs and AI development restrictions. This shift follows the removal of diversity hiring goals and aligns with recent actions by other tech companies. Executives emphasized a continued commitment to hiring the best candidates, while acknowledging the influence of recent executive orders on DEI programs.
Read More
Google has removed references to Black History Month, Women’s History Month, LGBTQ+ holidays, and other cultural events from its calendars, citing the unsustainable nature of manually maintaining hundreds of global events. This decision follows Google’s rollback of DEI initiatives and name changes reflecting executive orders from President Trump. Users now must manually add these events to their calendars. While Google claims continued celebration of cultural moments through other avenues, the calendar change has drawn considerable user criticism.
Read More
Google’s recent decision to eliminate diversity-based hiring targets has sparked a considerable amount of debate. It’s a move that’s being interpreted in many different ways, highlighting the complexities of diversity initiatives within large corporations. Some see it as a necessary step towards a purely meritocratic hiring process, where the most qualified candidate, regardless of background, is selected.
The argument for meritocracy centers around the belief that hiring decisions should be based solely on skills and experience. Focusing on factors like race or gender, some argue, introduces bias and undermines the goal of finding the best person for the job. This approach emphasizes a fair and equitable playing field, where every applicant is evaluated solely on their individual merits.… Continue reading
Target, a retail giant known for its wide array of products and once considered a progressive force in the business world, is now facing a proposed class-action lawsuit. The lawsuit, spearheaded by the City of Riviera Beach Police Pension Fund in Florida, alleges that Target defrauded shareholders by inflating stock prices while simultaneously using investor funds to pursue what the plaintiffs describe as “political and social goals.” This accusation essentially claims that Target’s embrace of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives negatively impacted its financial performance, ultimately harming investors.
This lawsuit is generating considerable debate. Many see it as an attack on DEI initiatives, highlighting a growing tension between corporate social responsibility and maximizing shareholder value.… Continue reading
Following Target’s rollback of its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, activists are calling for a nationwide boycott, citing the company’s prioritization of profits over its previous commitments to Black employees, shoppers, and businesses. A press conference at Target headquarters urged both employees to speak out and consumers to boycott the retailer, criticizing the timing of the decision just before Black History Month. While some Black business owners expressed concerns about the potential negative economic impact of a boycott, Target maintains its commitment to inclusion, although its philanthropic commitments remain uncertain following the withdrawal of funding by Twin Cities Pride. The boycott’s impact on Target and its future DEI efforts remains to be seen.
Read More
Facing pressure from conservative activists and the White House, Target announced modifications to its “Belonging at the Bullseye” diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) strategy. The changes include ending a program supporting Black employees and businesses, and discontinuing its three-year DEI goals focused on hiring and promoting underrepresented groups. This decision follows a Supreme Court ruling against affirmative action and mirrors similar actions by other major corporations. While Target’s commitment to inclusion predates recent controversies, the company will also cease participation in certain diversity surveys and review corporate partnerships.
Read More
Costco shareholders overwhelmingly rejected (98% opposed) a proposal from the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) to curtail the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The board recommended rejecting the proposal, citing its alignment with Costco’s commitment to respect and arguing that the DEI programs are legally sound and beneficial for business. This decision contrasts with other corporations that have scaled back DEI programs following the Supreme Court’s ruling in *Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard*. Costco maintains its DEI efforts enhance employee attraction and retention, despite NCPPR’s concerns about potential discrimination lawsuits.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood