Elon Musk’s America PAC is heavily funding Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election, donating $1 million to a petition signer and offering further incentives to sway the race in favor of Republican Judge Brad Schimel. This effort, which includes a substantial investment exceeding $20 million, is part of Musk’s broader campaign against “activist judges” and comes amid Tesla’s legal battle with the state. The election is considered a significant test of political power, with both Musk and Trump actively supporting Schimel against Democratic opponent Susan Crawford. The outcome will determine party control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Read More
The New York Times recently reported that Elon Musk donated $6,600 to Colorado Representative Lauren Boebert’s campaign. This relatively small sum, considering Musk’s immense wealth, has sparked considerable online discussion and speculation.
The sheer incongruity of such a small donation from a man of Musk’s financial stature is a point of immediate intrigue. Many commenters pointed out that the amount is so insignificant to him that it barely registers; it’s akin to someone writing a check for three cents. The relative ease with which Musk could donate far larger sums fuels suspicion regarding the true nature of the transaction.
The low amount of the donation has led to widespread speculation about its purpose.… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s America PAC is spending over $14 million in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race, offering $100 to registered voters who sign a petition opposing “activist judges.” This tactic, similar to one used in the 2020 presidential election, skirts legal lines regarding payment for voting, prompting debate among election law experts. The April 1st election will determine the court’s majority and impact rulings on abortion, unions, and gerrymandering. The race, already exceeding $76 million in spending, features significant contributions from both conservative and liberal mega-donors, targeting voters through the collected petition information.
Read More
Conservative foundations and wealthy donors funneled over $1 billion into approximately 150 nonprofits between 2020 and 2022, resulting in widespread voter suppression tactics. These tactics, including voter roll purges and ballot rejection, disproportionately impacted Democratic voters and contributed significantly to the low voter turnout in the 2024 election. This strategic funding enabled the disqualification of millions of votes, demonstrating a direct link between financial investment in voter suppression and the Democrats’ poor showing. To counteract this, increased funding for organizations combating voter suppression and promoting voter registration is urgently needed.
Read More
Angry Democratic donors are turning off the flow of money, expressing profound disappointment with the party’s current leadership and strategies. A pervasive sense of disillusionment fuels this withdrawal, as donors feel their contributions are not yielding tangible results or reflecting their values.
The lack of a clear, compelling message is a major source of frustration. Donors feel the party is adrift, lacking a cohesive plan and consistent communication, leaving them feeling unheard and their investment wasted. This is amplified by a perceived failure to learn from past mistakes, particularly the 2016 election, leading to a repetition of ineffective strategies and a lack of forward momentum.… Continue reading
Following President Trump’s executive order reinstating the federal death penalty, a $11,000 donation—the largest to date—was made to Luigi Mangione’s legal defense fund. The anonymous donor cited concerns about the politicization of capital punishment and potential prejudice against Mangione, who faces federal murder charges for the death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Mangione’s legal team will utilize the over $485,000 raised to fight charges across multiple jurisdictions. His next court appearances are scheduled for this week and into March.
Read More
In response to statements made by President Trump expressing interest in U.S. acquisition of Greenland, the Greenlandic parliament swiftly passed a bill banning political contributions from foreign or anonymous sources. This measure, effective immediately, aims to safeguard Greenland’s political integrity amidst rising geopolitical interest. The bill also limits domestic private contributions to political parties, establishing caps on both total and individual donations. While no evidence of foreign funding currently exists, the legislation serves as a preventative measure against potential undue influence.
Read More
The Greenlandic parliament, Inatsisartut, overwhelmingly approved a bill prohibiting anonymous and foreign political donations, aiming to safeguard Greenland’s political integrity. The bill passed with 22 votes in favor and no opposition, following a request from the government, Naalakkersuisut. This amendment comes shortly before the upcoming election, tentatively scheduled for March 11th, following a proposal by the Naalakkersuisut chairman.
Read More
In response to concerns about foreign interference in its upcoming election, Greenland’s government introduced a bill to ban foreign political donations. The bill, aiming to safeguard Greenland’s political integrity, prohibits parties from receiving contributions from foreign or anonymous donors and limits private donations. This action follows repeated assertions by Donald Trump of his desire to acquire Greenland, despite Greenland’s repeated declarations that it is not for sale. The bill is expected to pass quickly, potentially taking effect immediately.
Read More
Newly released Federal Election Commission filings reveal Elon Musk contributed over $290 million to the 2024 election, primarily supporting President Trump and the Republican party, securing significant influence within the new administration. Trump’s political committees also amassed millions, enabling continued political activity despite term limits. Meanwhile, key Senate incumbents in battleground states began stockpiling funds for the 2026 midterms, while the DNC spent heavily on post-election activities. Musk’s super PAC plans to continue its efforts in the 2026 cycle.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
Musk’s $6,600 Donation to Boebert Sparks Online Debate
The New York Times recently reported that Elon Musk donated $6,600 to Colorado Representative Lauren Boebert’s campaign. This relatively small sum, considering Musk’s immense wealth, has sparked considerable online discussion and speculation.
The sheer incongruity of such a small donation from a man of Musk’s financial stature is a point of immediate intrigue. Many commenters pointed out that the amount is so insignificant to him that it barely registers; it’s akin to someone writing a check for three cents. The relative ease with which Musk could donate far larger sums fuels suspicion regarding the true nature of the transaction.
The low amount of the donation has led to widespread speculation about its purpose.… Continue reading