President Trump declared that Elon Musk will face “serious consequences” if he funds Democratic candidates opposing Republicans who support the GOP’s budget bill, though he declined to specify them. Trump stated that he doesn’t wish to reconcile with Musk following their public feud, which stemmed from Musk’s criticism of the budget bill and subsequent attacks on Trump. Trump dismissed Musk’s past allegations as “old news” and expressed confidence in the bill’s passage, even suggesting that the conflict inadvertently strengthened its support. Despite previous support for Trump, Musk’s actions are now seen by Trump as disrespectful to the presidency.
Read More
Rep. Crockett and former Sen. Tester highlighted the detrimental effects of large political donations, citing Elon Musk’s substantial contribution to President Trump’s campaign and subsequent benefits, including government contracts. They decried the resulting cuts to social programs like Medicaid and SNAP, arguing these actions prioritize the wealthy at the expense of everyday Americans. This connection between campaign financing and legislative outcomes, exacerbated by the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, fuels public distrust in politicians. The congresswoman emphasized the need for increased voter engagement and awareness to counteract the influence of wealthy donors and misinformation campaigns.
Read More
Elon Musk announced a significant reduction in his political spending, stating he believes he has “done enough” to support Republican candidates. This shift follows a substantial investment exceeding $250 million aimed at aiding Donald Trump’s reelection and other Republican campaigns, including a costly, ultimately unsuccessful, Wisconsin Supreme Court race. The decreased involvement coincides with a decline in his public relationship with Trump and criticism surrounding his business ventures. While Musk leaves open the possibility of future political contributions, his current stance suggests a diminished role in upcoming elections.
Read More
A major GOP donor recently claimed the US economy has suffered a staggering 20 percent decline in just four weeks. This assertion, while dramatic, underscores a growing concern about the current economic climate. The donor’s comment highlights the significant anxieties felt even within the wealthiest segments of society impacted by recent economic shifts. This situation certainly warrants a closer look at the potential causes and consequences.
The donor’s statement itself is a potent symbol of the widening economic gap. It suggests that even those who have traditionally benefited from Republican policies are now feeling the pinch. While the precise 20% figure lacks detailed supporting data and may be an exaggeration designed to grab attention, the underlying sentiment is significant.… Continue reading
Home Depot co-founder Ken Langone, a major GOP donor, strongly criticized President Trump’s tariff policies, deeming them “bulls–t” and poorly advised. Langone specifically cited the 34 percent tariff on China and the 46 percent tariff on Vietnam as excessively aggressive and detrimental to negotiations. He questioned the flawed calculation methodology behind the tariffs, a sentiment echoed by other experts, including the economist whose work the administration cited. This criticism joins that of other prominent billionaires, indicating a growing concern among Trump loyalists regarding the economic impact of these trade measures.
Read More
Nearly 100 donors have requested refunds from Senator John Fetterman’s campaign, primarily citing his shift towards pro-Israel and Republican-aligned policies since the October 7th Gaza attacks. These requests, largely from small-dollar donors, represent a small percentage of total contributions but signal significant dissatisfaction among some supporters. While the Fetterman campaign has issued numerous refunds since 2021, the recent surge follows vocal criticism of his policy stances and perceived betrayal of campaign promises. Further refund requests are expected, and upcoming FEC filings will reflect this trend.
Read More
Elon Musk’s America PAC removed a video of $1 million giveaway winner Ekaterina Deistler after she stated the money was partly for voting in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race. A revised video, omitting the reference to voting, was subsequently released. Experts suggest this alteration reflects attempts to avoid accusations of violating state bribery statutes, related to Musk’s substantial spending in support of a conservative Supreme Court candidate. The initial video’s removal and subsequent re-edit underscore concerns about the legality of Musk’s actions.
Read More
Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial contributions to Republican candidates, exceeding $290 million in the 2024 cycle, have significantly impacted key elections. His involvement includes over $20 million spent to support a conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate, influencing a court with jurisdiction over crucial issues like redistricting and abortion access. Musk’s actions, despite his public criticism of George Soros’ political influence, have arguably surpassed Soros’ in scale and impact on American politics. This extensive financial involvement has raised concerns regarding potential conflicts of interest and undue influence on election outcomes.
Read More
Elon Musk, in Green Bay, Wisconsin, awarded $1 million to two voters, designating them spokespeople for his political group. This action is part of a significant financial investment exceeding $20 million to support conservative Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel in a crucial election impacting the court’s ideological balance. The election is viewed as vital by Musk and others for its potential influence on redistricting, and subsequently, the composition of the U.S. House of Representatives. A last-minute legal challenge to Musk’s actions was rejected by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, allowing the distribution of funds to proceed. The election’s outcome holds considerable weight for future rulings on pivotal issues such as abortion rights and voting rules.
Read More
The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent decision to reject an attempt to block Elon Musk’s $1 million giveaway has sparked a firestorm of controversy. The ruling, which allows Musk’s substantial financial contributions to proceed, has left many questioning the integrity of the electoral process and the influence of wealth in politics. The sheer scale of the donation – a million dollars – is staggering in its potential impact on a local election, leaving many feeling that the playing field has been tilted dramatically.
The court’s decision has ignited a wave of outrage among those who see it as a blatant endorsement of election interference.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood