Home Depot co-founder Ken Langone, a major GOP donor, strongly criticized President Trump’s tariff policies, deeming them “bulls–t” and poorly advised. Langone specifically cited the 34 percent tariff on China and the 46 percent tariff on Vietnam as excessively aggressive and detrimental to negotiations. He questioned the flawed calculation methodology behind the tariffs, a sentiment echoed by other experts, including the economist whose work the administration cited. This criticism joins that of other prominent billionaires, indicating a growing concern among Trump loyalists regarding the economic impact of these trade measures.
Read More
Nearly 100 donors have requested refunds from Senator John Fetterman’s campaign, primarily citing his shift towards pro-Israel and Republican-aligned policies since the October 7th Gaza attacks. These requests, largely from small-dollar donors, represent a small percentage of total contributions but signal significant dissatisfaction among some supporters. While the Fetterman campaign has issued numerous refunds since 2021, the recent surge follows vocal criticism of his policy stances and perceived betrayal of campaign promises. Further refund requests are expected, and upcoming FEC filings will reflect this trend.
Read More
Elon Musk’s America PAC removed a video of $1 million giveaway winner Ekaterina Deistler after she stated the money was partly for voting in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race. A revised video, omitting the reference to voting, was subsequently released. Experts suggest this alteration reflects attempts to avoid accusations of violating state bribery statutes, related to Musk’s substantial spending in support of a conservative Supreme Court candidate. The initial video’s removal and subsequent re-edit underscore concerns about the legality of Musk’s actions.
Read More
Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial contributions to Republican candidates, exceeding $290 million in the 2024 cycle, have significantly impacted key elections. His involvement includes over $20 million spent to support a conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate, influencing a court with jurisdiction over crucial issues like redistricting and abortion access. Musk’s actions, despite his public criticism of George Soros’ political influence, have arguably surpassed Soros’ in scale and impact on American politics. This extensive financial involvement has raised concerns regarding potential conflicts of interest and undue influence on election outcomes.
Read More
Elon Musk, in Green Bay, Wisconsin, awarded $1 million to two voters, designating them spokespeople for his political group. This action is part of a significant financial investment exceeding $20 million to support conservative Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel in a crucial election impacting the court’s ideological balance. The election is viewed as vital by Musk and others for its potential influence on redistricting, and subsequently, the composition of the U.S. House of Representatives. A last-minute legal challenge to Musk’s actions was rejected by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, allowing the distribution of funds to proceed. The election’s outcome holds considerable weight for future rulings on pivotal issues such as abortion rights and voting rules.
Read More
The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent decision to reject an attempt to block Elon Musk’s $1 million giveaway has sparked a firestorm of controversy. The ruling, which allows Musk’s substantial financial contributions to proceed, has left many questioning the integrity of the electoral process and the influence of wealth in politics. The sheer scale of the donation – a million dollars – is staggering in its potential impact on a local election, leaving many feeling that the playing field has been tilted dramatically.
The court’s decision has ignited a wave of outrage among those who see it as a blatant endorsement of election interference.… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s America PAC is heavily funding Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election, donating $1 million to a petition signer and offering further incentives to sway the race in favor of Republican Judge Brad Schimel. This effort, which includes a substantial investment exceeding $20 million, is part of Musk’s broader campaign against “activist judges” and comes amid Tesla’s legal battle with the state. The election is considered a significant test of political power, with both Musk and Trump actively supporting Schimel against Democratic opponent Susan Crawford. The outcome will determine party control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Read More
The New York Times recently reported that Elon Musk donated $6,600 to Colorado Representative Lauren Boebert’s campaign. This relatively small sum, considering Musk’s immense wealth, has sparked considerable online discussion and speculation.
The sheer incongruity of such a small donation from a man of Musk’s financial stature is a point of immediate intrigue. Many commenters pointed out that the amount is so insignificant to him that it barely registers; it’s akin to someone writing a check for three cents. The relative ease with which Musk could donate far larger sums fuels suspicion regarding the true nature of the transaction.
The low amount of the donation has led to widespread speculation about its purpose.… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s America PAC is spending over $14 million in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race, offering $100 to registered voters who sign a petition opposing “activist judges.” This tactic, similar to one used in the 2020 presidential election, skirts legal lines regarding payment for voting, prompting debate among election law experts. The April 1st election will determine the court’s majority and impact rulings on abortion, unions, and gerrymandering. The race, already exceeding $76 million in spending, features significant contributions from both conservative and liberal mega-donors, targeting voters through the collected petition information.
Read More
Conservative foundations and wealthy donors funneled over $1 billion into approximately 150 nonprofits between 2020 and 2022, resulting in widespread voter suppression tactics. These tactics, including voter roll purges and ballot rejection, disproportionately impacted Democratic voters and contributed significantly to the low voter turnout in the 2024 election. This strategic funding enabled the disqualification of millions of votes, demonstrating a direct link between financial investment in voter suppression and the Democrats’ poor showing. To counteract this, increased funding for organizations combating voter suppression and promoting voter registration is urgently needed.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
Musk’s $6,600 Donation to Boebert Sparks Online Debate
The New York Times recently reported that Elon Musk donated $6,600 to Colorado Representative Lauren Boebert’s campaign. This relatively small sum, considering Musk’s immense wealth, has sparked considerable online discussion and speculation.
The sheer incongruity of such a small donation from a man of Musk’s financial stature is a point of immediate intrigue. Many commenters pointed out that the amount is so insignificant to him that it barely registers; it’s akin to someone writing a check for three cents. The relative ease with which Musk could donate far larger sums fuels suspicion regarding the true nature of the transaction.
The low amount of the donation has led to widespread speculation about its purpose.… Continue reading