Several of Trump’s controversial nominees, including Pete Hegseth for Department of Defense and Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence, possess extreme views and/or face accusations of misconduct. While potential setbacks from scandals may temporarily hinder confirmations, replacements are likely to be equally objectionable, though perhaps less publicly scandalous. This pattern extends to other nominees like Linda McMahon and Brendan Carr, who exhibit concerning ideologies and agendas. The most alarming, Tom Homan, requires no Senate confirmation and plans aggressive immigration enforcement tactics.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of use. This allows for a direct line of communication between the public and the news organization. Contributions can help The Daily Beast deliver timely and relevant reporting.
Read More
Donald Trump’s recent appointments, including Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense, and Matt Gaetz for Attorney General, represent a significant shift towards controversial figures. Gabbard, a former congresswoman with a history of promoting conspiracy theories and aligning with Russian propaganda, is particularly concerning given her new role overseeing intelligence agencies. Her past actions, including downplaying Assad’s chemical weapons attacks and spreading misinformation about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, raise serious questions about her suitability for the position. This unconventional approach to staffing key national security positions reflects a clear preference by Trump for candidates who challenge established norms.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker