President Trump’s proclamation ordering the deportation of Venezuelan nationals under the Alien Enemies Act has been temporarily blocked by federal Judge James Boasberg. This action, however, may already have been defied, as two planes of deportees allegedly landed despite a restraining order. The administration’s actions, potentially in violation of court orders in multiple cases, could constitute contempt of court, creating a constitutional crisis if executive branch enforcement agencies refuse to comply with judicial mandates. This situation highlights the potential limitations of the judiciary’s power to enforce its orders against a president unwilling to comply.
Read More
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan has held Mike Lindell in contempt of court for his failure to provide crucial documents in the Smartmatic defamation case. This decision comes after Lindell repeatedly failed to comply with court orders demanding the production of specific data and financial records. The requested materials include analytics data from his company’s website and financial records detailing Lindell’s financial status for 2022 and 2023. This lack of compliance demonstrates a blatant disregard for the legal process, raising serious questions about Lindell’s commitment to a fair and transparent legal proceeding.
The judge’s order explicitly states that if Lindell continues to refuse to comply, Smartmatic is free to pursue further legal action to secure the necessary documents.… Continue reading
Judge Amir H. Ali issued a 48-hour deadline for the Trump administration to release billions of dollars in frozen foreign aid, citing noncompliance with a prior court order. This followed a lawsuit filed by nonprofits alleging that the administration’s funding freeze, stemming from a January executive order, violated federal law and jeopardized crucial programs. The administration’s lawyer failed to confirm any release of funds, despite the court’s mandate to resume disbursements. This marks the second instance of a federal court finding the Trump administration in contempt of court for failing to comply with orders regarding spending freezes.
Read More
A federal judge has issued a ruling declaring that the Trump administration is in violation of a prior order mandating the lifting of a federal spending freeze. This isn’t simply a matter of bureaucratic oversight; it represents a direct challenge to the authority of the judicial branch, and raises serious questions about the rule of law. The implications are far-reaching and unsettling, particularly given the administration’s apparent disregard for legal precedent.
The judge’s order explicitly stated that the administration’s continued refusal to release the frozen funds constitutes contempt of court. This is not a minor infraction; contempt of court carries potential criminal penalties, including arrest.… Continue reading
A federal judge recently held Rudy Giuliani in contempt of court for repeatedly making false claims about election workers. This decision highlights a frustrating pattern where powerful individuals seem to face significantly lighter consequences than ordinary citizens for similar offenses. The judge’s action, while a step towards accountability, is only one small piece of a larger puzzle concerning the unequal application of justice.
The outrage surrounding this case stems from a perceived double standard. Many feel that if an average person made the same false statements, they would face far more severe repercussions, possibly even immediate jail time. The notion that wealth and influence can shield someone from the full weight of the law fuels widespread cynicism about the judicial system.… Continue reading
Judge Lewis J. Liman held Rudy Giuliani in contempt of court for failing to comply with orders to provide information related to a $148 million defamation judgment. Giuliani’s insufficient disclosure of assets, including incomplete lists of doctors and other service providers, led the judge to exclude certain testimony and draw inferences from the missing evidence. This non-compliance stemmed from Giuliani’s claims that requests were overly broad and a “trap,” a justification the judge rejected. The ruling impacts a trial concerning Giuliani’s Florida condominium, with sanctions potentially impacting his ability to retain the property.
Read More
Federal Judge Lewis Liman held Rudy Giuliani in contempt of court for failing to comply with orders to provide information to Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, two Georgia election workers he defamed. Giuliani’s noncompliance, deemed willful by the judge, involved delaying the transfer of assets, including a Mercedes and numerous valuables, despite prior court orders. These sanctions come amidst ongoing efforts by Freeman and Moss to collect a $150 million judgement against Giuliani. The judge’s ruling limits Giuliani’s defense arguments, potentially impacting his upcoming trial to retain ownership of his Florida condo.
Read More
Rudy Giuliani faced a seven-hour contempt hearing regarding his failure to fully comply with a court order to turn over assets to compensate two women he defamed. Giuliani claimed he didn’t intentionally withhold information, citing memory issues and a desire to protect sentimental items like his grandfather’s pocket watch. However, inconsistencies emerged regarding his asset declarations, including missing items from his apartment and conflicting accounts about the location of a signed Joe DiMaggio jersey. The judge deemed Giuliani in violation of the court order, and further hearings are scheduled to determine sanctions and the surrender of additional assets.
Read More
A federal judge is considering holding Rudy Giuliani in contempt for failing to comply with court orders to provide information and assets to two Georgia election workers awarded $148 million in a defamation suit. Judge Liman is dismissive of Giuliani’s attempts to avoid compliance and may infer negatively from this evidence, potentially jeopardizing Giuliani’s Florida condominium. The contempt hearing will address the seizure of Giuliani’s assets, including his Palm Beach property, to satisfy the judgment. Giuliani maintains the property is his primary residence and contests the seizure, with a trial scheduled for January 16th.
Read More
Donald Trump may have broken his gag order again, and it seems like this has become a regular occurrence that just keeps repeating itself. The issue of contempt of court should be a serious violation of his bail agreement, but for some reason, he seems to be getting away with it time and time again. The lack of consequences for his actions only serves to make a mockery of the rule of law, and it’s frustrating to see how the justice system is failing to hold the powerful accountable.
It’s baffling how Trump can openly admit to breaking his gag order, have his surrogates also admit to it, and yet there are still no repercussions.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood