Democrats are proposing a bill that would mandate retailers to clearly display the portion of a product’s price attributable to Trump-era tariffs. This initiative aims to provide consumers with greater transparency regarding the impact of these tariffs on their purchasing power. The idea is to make it undeniably clear how much more consumers are paying due to these specific trade policies.
The proposed legislation seeks to shift the burden of demonstrating the tariff’s effect directly onto retailers, forcing them to actively showcase this information on product labels or in other prominent locations. This, in theory, would make it far harder for retailers to simply absorb the added tariff cost and quietly raise their overall prices without being held accountable for the increase.… Continue reading
Amazon briefly considered adding import charges to its ultra-low-cost Haul platform, but ultimately decided against it. This decision followed a news report suggesting Amazon would display tariffs, prompting a negative White House reaction and a personal call from President Trump to Jeff Bezos. The White House’s criticism stemmed from the timing of the reported plan, and ultimately the decision was deemed a “good move” by the Commerce Secretary. The consideration was unrelated to the recent tariff increases, and Amazon is currently assessing the impact of those tariffs on its third-party sellers and overall business.
Read More
Amazon considered, but ultimately rejected, displaying tariff charges on its discount platform, Amazon Haul, a move intended to compete with Temu and Shein. This decision followed a report suggesting Amazon would show tariff costs, prompting strong White House condemnation and a phone call from President Trump to Jeff Bezos. No changes were implemented on Amazon’s main site. The episode highlights the growing consumer visibility of tariff-related price increases in online retail.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker