constitutional law

Trump’s Illegal Voting Machine Order: Defiance, Not Adaptation

President Trump’s executive order, titled “Restoring Trust in American Elections,” mandates new voting rules deemed unconstitutional by many. The order, driven by unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud, oversteps executive authority by dictating state election procedures, including requiring proof of citizenship on voter registration forms and restricting mail-in ballot deadlines. This action is predicted to face legal challenges due to its infringement upon states’ rights to regulate their own elections, as explicitly outlined in the Constitution. The order also includes impractical demands, such as mandating the use of nonexistent voting machines, further highlighting its potential flaws.

Read More

Trump Threatens to Exile Tesla Vandals to El Salvador: Legal Experts Cite Constitutional Violation

Following vandalism targeting Tesla, former President Trump threatened 20-year prison sentences in El Salvador for perpetrators, a threat legal experts deem unconstitutional and unlawful. This follows Trump’s recent deportation of alleged gang members to El Salvador and his support of Elon Musk’s Tesla amidst public backlash. Critics like Sherrilyn Ifill warn of the potential for this to become a precedent for sending U.S. citizens to foreign prisons. The legality of such actions is highly questionable, violating both U.S. law and the Constitution, according to legal experts.

Read More

Judge Rules Musk’s USAID Shutdown Likely Unconstitutional

A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from further actions against the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The ruling, stemming from a lawsuit filed by fired USAID employees, finds Musk’s actions likely violated the Constitution’s appointments clause and separation of powers. The judge determined Musk, despite lacking formal authority, effectively functioned as DOGE’s administrator, wielding unprecedented power to dismantle agencies. The Trump administration, which vehemently denies the ruling, has vowed to appeal.

Read More

Judge Rules Trump’s Impoundment of USAID Funds Unconstitutional

A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration’s blanket freeze on nearly $2 billion in foreign aid was unconstitutional, ordering the funds’ release. The judge found the administration’s actions violated the separation of powers by impounding congressionally appropriated funds, contradicting established constitutional partnership between the executive and legislative branches. While acknowledging the government’s right to challenge future aid allocations, the court mandated the immediate disbursement of owed funds for existing contracts and grants. The ruling followed a temporary restraining order and subsequent appeals, highlighting the significant harm caused by the freeze to numerous organizations and their employees.

Read More

Judge Rules Trump Executive Order Unconstitutional

A Washington state judge issued a preliminary injunction against President Trump’s executive order banning gender-affirming care for transgender minors, deeming it unconstitutional. The order blocks federal funding for such treatments and potentially criminalizes the medical procedures themselves, exceeding the President’s authority. The judge cited violations of the separation of powers and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment. This preliminary injunction follows a temporary restraining order and is expected to be appealed, potentially reaching the Supreme Court.

Read More

Shapiro Sues Trump Administration Over Pennsylvania Funding Freeze

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for its broad freeze on federal funding, alleging an unconstitutional withholding of at least $5.5 billion in appropriated funds. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, claims the freeze violates the Administrative Procedure Act and fundamental constitutional tenets. Shapiro argues the Trump administration is breaking contracts with the Commonwealth, jeopardizing crucial projects related to public health, infrastructure, and job creation. The suit names several federal agencies and their leaders as defendants, and follows unsuccessful attempts to restore the frozen funding.

Read More

Reagan Judge Rebukes Trump’s Unconstitutional Power Grab

Judge Coughenour granted a preliminary injunction against former President Trump’s executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship, finding the order unconstitutional. The judge’s decision, which blocks enforcement of the order ahead of its February 18th effective date, strongly affirmed the rule of law and rejected the administration’s attempt to amend the Constitution via executive action. He declared that altering birthright citizenship requires a constitutional amendment, not an executive order. This ruling comes from a Reagan-appointed judge, underscoring the bipartisan nature of the legal challenge to the executive order.

Read More

Judge to Rule on Challenge to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order

Following arguments from 18 state attorneys general and several cities, a federal judge in Boston is considering a request to block President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship. Plaintiffs contend the order violates the 14th Amendment and would cost states significant funding for essential services. The judge’s decision is pending, but two other federal judges have already issued nationwide injunctions against the order. The core legal dispute centers on the 14th Amendment’s definition of citizenship and the executive branch’s authority to alter it.

Read More

GOP Senators Embrace Musk’s Unconstitutional Power Grab

Elon Musk’s efforts to curtail government agency funding and operations have garnered support from some Republican lawmakers, with Senator Rick Scott praising Musk’s actions as ensuring responsible spending. This approach, however, directly challenges Congress’s established oversight role in budgetary matters. The implicit transfer of such power raises significant questions regarding governmental accountability and the separation of powers. The situation highlights a potential shift in power dynamics between the private sector and legislative branch.

Read More